Signings, Suggestions & Rumours Discussion

Remember, we are paying Bateman a huge chunk to play for Nth Qld and Bud Sullivan to play for Souths also - those commitments will be done when it's time to extend Galvin + you'd think cap has gone up by then.

Latu's contract will also be up for renewal too. We will have the money, it will just come down to our results and, as with all players, it will be up to them.

Frankly, at the end of a deal they are free to decide if they want to leave. We can't do that much about it other than what's in our control. I'll just enjoy the next 2 seasons while he is contracted to us and see where it all goes.
 
Plenty can see it....

You think anyone saw what they had coming at the Cowboys when they signed Thurston?
I seriously doubt it...

Franchise Players aren't just your good / great players, they're the corner post of an organisation.
We already lost one in Tedesco, I'd be betting we'll do everything we can to keep this next one.
All WE can do, Is hope it's enough...
There is a definite mindset with a franchise player that goes beyond talent.
For all his natural ability Latu came back at the preseason unfit pretty typical for a young bloke - not the case with Galvin.
 
Remember, we are paying Bateman a huge chunk to play for Nth Qld and Bud Sullivan to play for Souths also - those commitments will be done when it's time to extend Galvin + you'd think cap has gone up by then.

Latu's contract will also be up for renewal too. We will have the money, it will just come down to our results and, as with all players, it will be up to them.

Frankly, at the end of a deal they are free to decide if they want to leave. We can't do that much about it other than what's in our control. I'll just enjoy the next 2 seasons while he is contracted to us and see where it all goes.

Who knows with Sullivan, as isn't it only this season with Souths at this stage and still with WT through 2027?
 
Who knows with Sullivan, as isn't it only this season with Souths at this stage and still with WT through 2027?
Yes you're right. He has a deal with us for 26 and 27.

We can only hope he does well at Souths and they keep him, but he knows if he comes back, he will play reserves, so he'll be looking for a club.

That particular situation is a bit wait and see for us.
 
Yes you're right. He has a deal with us for 26 and 27.

We can only hope he does well at Souths and they keep him, but he knows if he comes back, he will play reserves, so he'll be looking for a club.

That particular situation is a bit wait and see for us.
I fear Super League will be the only option if he doesn't show he can make in NRL 1st grade, this is his 3rd club now, time to really make a go of it.
 
Ok...so if I'm not saying anything no one else doesn't already know, why continue refuting it?

You have mixed up my original message anyway. It's very simple.
You reckon I'm mixed up?

Here's your Question - And It's quite clear - Because you prefaced by saying "Here is the real Question"
Here's the real question.

Would one pay any player $1 million a season after a handful of NRL games?

And following is my answer (Verbatim)

Titans have done it a couple times,
So yeah - People would do it.
 
You reckon I'm mixed up?

Here's your Question - And It's quite clear - Because you prefaced by saying "Here is the real Question"


And following is my answer (Verbatim)

Titans have done it a couple times,
So yeah - People would do it.
Problem is you quoted only one player that has done it over a handful of games. The others were origin reps and josh reynolds. We just disagree and it's ok, but keep digging in. Up to you
 
There is a definite mindset with a franchise player that goes beyond talent.
For all his natural ability Latu came back at the preseason unfit pretty typical for a young bloke - not the case with Galvin.
Exactly
- I'm surprised it seems ignored in the back and forth here.
Especially since both have a recent memory of our Coaches playing days.
 
Problem is you quoted only one player that has done it over a handful of games. The others were origin reps and josh reynolds. We just disagree and it's ok, but keep digging in. Up to you

So there are people that would do it, have done it - and will do it again?
What's exactly is your Question?

There's been others, Your ignorance doesn't mean it can't and doesn't happen.
You could argue Lodge signed a big money deal at the broncos after only a handful of games.
If I could be bothered trying to put brains in statues - I'd think of more.
 
So there are people that would do it, have done it - and will do it again?
What's exactly is your Question?

There's been others, Your ignorance doesn't mean it can't and doesn't happen.
You could argue Lodge signed a big money deal at the broncos after only a handful of games.
If I could be bothered trying to put brains in statues - I'd think of more.
The topic has been done to death. You're welcome to your opinion. Next.
 
Yep 1 year loan deal and if he doesn't offer anything there, he will be back in 26 and we are stuck with him, can only hope he improves and souths want to keep him.
It also gives us 12 months to find a suitor for 26 and 27, whether that's Souths or otherwise.

I highly doubt he'll be back.
 
Ok...so if I'm not saying anything no one else doesn't already know, why continue refuting it?

You have mixed up my original message anyway. It's very simple.

As it stands...TODAY...he is not worth a million because he has only played a handful of games. Has he played well? Yes? Has he played well enough for long enough to command a million a season? I don't think so.

If he puts a good season together in 2025, we still have him under contract for 2026, so he's unlikely to get a million from us during that time. 2027 will be his year.

in 2027, he would have played 3 seasons and if he's been consistent, then he will have earned the contract, albeit with a premium due to what you've pointed out being a lack of halves. Could a club come in and overpay...of course! It happens all the time. People on here talking about 20 million dollar, 10 year deals are kidding themselves - if you would wager on that, then I'd take that bet. One million a season is more likely, if, and only if, he has shown consistency during the time with us. I'd be happy to pay him a million a season also if he is a factor in success for the club. The only caveat being is to show that you can do it over more than 18 games - i don't think that's controversial.

What you have not factored in, is that every year, a new shit hot rookie comes onto the scene and steals the limelight. This may also happen and it's likely across a 2 year time span. You or I don't have a crystal ball and I'm not the one making future predictions. I am talking about right now. If you want to read into it more than that, then that's on you. I really don't know what you're arguing about.

Anyway - I can't keep repeating myself. It's the last comment I make on the matter with you.
You’re worth what someone is willing to pay - not what you “think” someone is worth.
 

Staff online

Back
Top