OFFICIAL Lachlan Galvin #277 *Released* Career Discussion.

I reckon this all started with Issac trying to get Galvin to Parra to help Mitch because they lost Brown. Now if the dogs sign him it screws up his plan. And maybe destabilises the Dogs playing group and screws up Parra too.
Richo offered the contract knowing this would happen. Not only has he gotten rid of an unwanted player 18 months early he has destabilised 2 of our closest rivals. Richo is playing 4d chess... lets go with this narrative?
 

Oh yeah, that was more bullsh*t from Gould. The best outcome would be for Galvin's arrival to force out Mitchell Woods and he goes on to star elsewhere.
I think the reason the bulldogs are not in the market for Galvin is they already have him signed
 
Wouldn’t surprise me to see him end up at the Roosters. Roosters are the sort of club that if they want a player, they more often than not get their man. Especially a kid like Galvin.
 
Oh great. You dont strive for excellence I see. Benji hasnt helped him in a couple of seasons so far, when was he going to spring into action?

Tell me Tucker, where in your life where you are striving for excellence, mate?

Luai obviously has a set against him so that wasnt goin to work either the way we did things. We stuffed it up, plain and simple and this is the repercussions.

Oh does he now. Where is the proof of this? I refer to your previous reply to me, the onus is on you, the one making the claim..

I'll wait.
 
Tell me Tucker, where in your life where you are striving for excellence, mate?
The fact that you would ask another man that question shows that you have never contemplated the concept yourself.
Oh does he now. Where is the proof of this? I refer to your previous reply to me, the onus is on you, the one making the claim..

I'll wait.
Hahaha come on mate, thats really weak. Youve never answered my questions to you of the same ilk.
He had a crack on social media, he had a crack in the press conference and has shown multiple times on field that he is tolerating the kid only. They may be on speaking terms, I dont know, Im not there. See the difference there compared to your claims? There is some science behind my thoughts.
 

Latest posts

Members online

Back
Top