Signings, Suggestions & Rumours Discussion

.

Sorry …why to we need a small backrower again ?

This guy is a shrimp
Funny you should say that.

This guy has literally been playing Prop in the KOE side some weeks. #13 as well. #9 the last 3-4 weeks or so.

Very versatile & plays first receiver when not playing dummy half.

Odd little player, but surprisingly effective.

The idea is- versatile enough to ALSO cover for Api at #9 while still offering other uses.
 
that’s a goooood shout

How about Pole at 13 ?
Funny you should say that.

This guy has literally been playing Prop in the KOE side some weeks. #13 as well. #9 the last 3-4 weeks or so.

Very versatile & plays first receiver when not playing dummy half.

Odd little player, but surprisingly effective.

The idea is- versatile enough to ALSO cover for Api at #9 while still offering other uses.

Hooker possibly … but not back row/ 13 …we need more size IMO… we lose both sides of the ruck most weeks …. Im not sure he helps that
 
How about Pole at 13 ?


Hooker possibly … but not back row/ 13 …we need more size IMO… we lose both sides of the ruck most weeks …. Im not sure he helps that
We are playing Latu at #13 at times.

Lussick is just that versatile guy that fills a few needs. Not really any smaller than Connor Watson.

80 minute player, playing at prop in the KOE some weeks. #13 other weeks. But ALSO plays first receiver in their attack. Almost like Yeoh in how he is used.

But ALSO plays #9. Was a big part of the Warriors top squad last season at #9 and did well.
 
We are playing Latu at #13 at times.

Lussick is just that versatile guy that fills a few needs. Not really any smaller than Connor Watson.

80 minute player, playing at prop in the KOE some weeks. #13 other weeks. But ALSO plays first receiver in their attack. Almost like Yeoh in how he is used.

But ALSO plays #9. Was a big part of the Warriors top squad last season at #9 and did well.

Yes ..and it’s a mistake to be playing Latu at 13 ,,,and I said so before his game last week…he is a half …

I actually don’t mind Lussick as a 9 … he could be a starter at another club …. But we know that won’t be happening here

There is a bit of an obsession trying to find a Connor Watson … we are a different team to them …rightly or wrongly…what works for them may not work for us
 
Is there proof of anything recently with TDS?

I dunno where @supercoach heard that coffee with gus goss but he is a long time poster here with a bit of cred that doesnt post shit for nothing
It was in one of those little snippet columns months ago, probably written by the drunk but it was worded something like young Tigers no 9 seen having coffee with Gus. These things tend to be pretty accurate
 
We are playing Latu at #13 at times.

Lussick is just that versatile guy that fills a few needs. Not really any smaller than Connor Watson.

80 minute player, playing at prop in the KOE some weeks. #13 other weeks. But ALSO plays first receiver in their attack. Almost like Yeoh in how he is used.

But ALSO plays #9. Was a big part of the Warriors top squad last season at #9 and did well.
Freddy Lussick not a bad shout at all.

Here is a recent highlights video featuring him & backrower Fatialofa.

 
Siliva Havili's another one worth looking at if we are to lose Da Silva for next year. similar mould. would be happy with either.
Was just about to say the same thing. He would be my preference. Can do 25 minutes at hooker but also is big enough to play in the middle. He carved us up one game when he was at Souths. I’ve watched him for years. He never gets as much praise as he deserves.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top