Signings, Suggestions & Rumours Discussion

Tom Shines said:
No one has been … the whole team blows inside the 20
Click to expand...
The red zone attack or lack there of is often noted not just by us but even the commentators.
But in most games it’s hardly a factor.
Scoring from a tackle or two inside the 20m agaisnt a disjointed defence is not red zone attack.
It would be when the team is given a full set to orchestrate a play within that zone.
What I’ve noticed is yes our red zone attack is clunky but I’ve also noticed it’s not where clubs are starting their tries from. In most cases line breaks leading to try scoring opportunities start from around the halfway mark. I’d be curious to know who has the most successful red zone attack in the comp. My guess is it’s the guess is it’s the Warriors or Panthers.
It needs improvement sure, but to be a real threat in the comp you need to convert your line break opportunities that start from midfield!
 
Vicious said:
He won’t be in Reggie’s, he will take the wing spot of Jack Bostock while he is out with his ACL injury.
Click to expand...

He is a much lesser player than Bostock IMO….. so he might play in March /April before Bostock is back ? Also thought he wanted to play FB ?
 
Last edited:
Needaname said:
The red zone attack or lack there of is often noted not just by us but even the commentators.
But in most games it’s hardly a factor.
Scoring from a tackle or two inside the 20m agaisnt a disjointed defence is not red zone attack.
It would be when the team is given a full set to orchestrate a play within that zone.
What I’ve noticed is yes our red zone attack is clunky but I’ve also noticed it’s not where clubs are starting their tries from. In most cases line breaks leading to try scoring opportunities start from around the halfway mark. I’d be curious to know who has the most successful red zone attack in the comp. My guess is it’s the guess is it’s the Warriors or Panthers.
It needs improvement sure, but to be a real threat in the comp you need to convert your line break opportunities that start from midfield!
Click to expand...

Lots of tries are scored from repeated sets inside the 20 … we seem to struggle with this IMO…

A lot of it is done through forwards breaking through tackles or offloading to themselves … again … a struggle for us seemingly
 
Last edited:
Tom Shines said:
Lots of tries are scored from repeated sets inside the 20 … we seem to struggle with this IMO…
Click to expand...
We don’t have enough speed in our team tj score long range tries, not enough quality or class to score when we in the red zone, it doesn’t leave much left.
I know I sound like a broken down record, but the imbalance within our team is a big problem aside from our obvious lack of class.
With all the money we are saving from letting players go and signing nobody, what is the point of it ?
 
Needaname said:
The red zone attack or lack there of is often noted not just by us but even the commentators.
But in most games it’s hardly a factor.
Scoring from a tackle or two inside the 20m agaisnt a disjointed defence is not red zone attack.
It would be when the team is given a full set to orchestrate a play within that zone.
What I’ve noticed is yes our red zone attack is clunky but I’ve also noticed it’s not where clubs are starting their tries from. In most cases line breaks leading to try scoring opportunities start from around the halfway mark. I’d be curious to know who has the most successful red zone attack in the comp. My guess is it’s the guess is it’s the Warriors or Panthers.
It needs improvement sure, but to be a real threat in the comp you need to convert your line break opportunities that start from midfield!
Click to expand...
Commentators also note it is hard to score from inside the 10 these days. Need more depth.
Do agree that most of the time our attack is still clunky in the 20.
 
Vicious said:
We don’t have enough speed in our team tj score long range tries, not enough quality or class to score when we in the red zone, it doesn’t leave much left.
I know I sound like a broken down record, but the imbalance within our team is a big problem aside from our obvious lack of class.
With all the money we are saving from letting players go and signing nobody, what is the point of it ?
Click to expand...

They lack power and aggression in the forwards IMO… even May doesn’t help much in this area… they get dominated on both sides of the ruck
 
Last edited:
mikey said:
Commentators also note it is hard to score from inside the 10 these days. Need more depth.
Do agree that most of the time our attack is still clunky in the 20.
Click to expand...

I don’t have the stats in front of me ..but my recollection is that Canberra seem to manage it ok? Inside the 20 anyway
 
Last edited:
Tom Shines said:
I don’t have the stats in front of me ..but my recollection is that Canberra seem to manage it ok? Inside the 20 anyway
Click to expand...
I commented on the 10. Should you have a differing opinion all goo but address the comment pls instead of moving the goal posts as you seem to like too. It's getting boring.
 
mikey said:
I commented on the 10. Should you have a differing opinion all goo but address the comment pls instead of moving the goal posts as you seem to like too. It's getting boring.
Click to expand...

I don’t need to move shit mate … I thought this was a discussion people were having about the attack inside the 20.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Members online

Total: 2,624 (members: 21, guests: 2,603)
Back
Top