Sorry Team - long read - but it needs to be said.
I have raised leadership as a critical issue a few times. Some of it in a positve manner and some of it negative. I think that both of your opinions on Api are valid at the same time though. It also doesn't apply just to Api - you can extend it to Laui and Benji. We have plenty of leadership ability in the Club - it just isn't the right type, at the right place at the right time.
Despite what many people think leadership in not an inherited skill, some pick it up along the way either by being inspired by another leader or identifying what not to do by a poor leader. However, there is formal training that can be done to develop leadership and I think that is something the club could benefit from (for all players) over the off season.
There appears to be some leadership cpabilities missing in our team at the moment. At training and on the field we have plenty of lead by example leaders - but it isn't the leadership we need at critical junctures during games.
I have done a lot of leadership training, both as a student and as an instructor, over many years. I'm not going to bore you with the theory - you can look it up if you are interested. But let me have a shot at outlining where I think the issues lie (Laurie Daley may want to take some notes).
Watching the Warriors game, one thing was obvious: our leadership, particularly on the field, didn't adapt. It was a little better, but much too late from Benji, with his changes from the sideline. This has been exposed several times - the Storm game being the most evident.
Now, everyone leads differently: some tell you exactly what to do, others hype you up and some lead by example; but, the real test is what they do when things aren't going to plan. Before we delve into a solution here's a breakdown of some different leadership styles in normal speak:
- Autocratic: “Do what I say, no questions.”
- Democratic: “What do you reckon, boys? Let’s decide together.”
- Transformational: “Let’s rise up and do something special today.”
- Transactional: “You do your job, you get your reward. Stuff up, you’re dropped.”
- Laissez-Faire: “You guys figure it out, I’ll watch.”
- Servant: “How can I help you be your best?”
- Situational: “I’ll lead however you need me to right now.”
- Charismatic: “Follow me because I’ve got the energy and vibe.”
Now if we apply this to our club captains and coach this is how it pans out (in my mind anyway).
Api
Api appears to be a combination of a
Charismatic and
Servant leader. Most of the time he is calm, supportive, and knows how to talk to different players and tries hard to set standards. Great qualities. But when the game turns ugly, he is too quiet and it feels like no one takes charge. That slips into
Laissez-Faire – the “someone else fix this” vibe.
Api needs to develop a
Transformational leadershp style on the field. To be the bloke who can step up and say, “Right boys, here’s what we’re doing to get back in this.” He needs to use his leadership and experience to have the team adapt to the changing environment. It takes more than just leadership though, it requires football knowledge. Api needs to understand how to unhinge what is providing the oppositon strength. I will get to this later.
Jarome Luai
Luai appears to be more of a
Charismatic and
Democratic leader. He hypes the team up, brings energy, and loves to create plays. But when it’s going pear-shaped, he looks frustrated, and the team feels it.
Luai needs to develop
Situational Leadership as a club in his golf bag. He has to be able to adjust to what the team needs in that moment – keep the hype when we’re rolling, but when we’re under the pump, stay calm and clear. He also needs a bit of that same
Transformational style as Api to pull the boys together and reset their focus when it’s falling apart. Again he needs tools to enable him to undermine the opposition on the run if they are nullifying his attacking prowess.
Benji Marshall
Benji’s coaching style so far seems to be
Democratic with a
Transformational vision. He wants to inspire the boys with an attacking mindset and let them play what they see. Awesome in theory. But when Plan A gets shut down, we’re seeing no adjustments until it’s way too late.
Benji possibly needs a to bit more
Situational and Autocratic at times (we don't know for sure because his leadership is not on display). Sometimes it’s not about giving players the freedom to figure it out. Sometimes it’s about saying, “Listen up – this is what we’re doing now, and here’s how.” The best coaches find the balance between empowering their players and stepping in with clear tactical plans when needed.
Combined
Api, Luai, and Benji all have great leadership qualities, but none of them are adapting fast enough when the plan isn't working. They have all come from systems where their current style was developed and has been successful - so they are struggling to adapt and they possibly lack the understanding to transform their inspirational/participative leadership styles when knowledge and clalm are required. This is also where the Co-Captain fad is lacking. When things aren't working, under stress there needs to be a single point of truth and direction to rally around. Give one the C and one VC and it will work. No need to make it complicated; ie who do I look to for guidancce.
Tools
The tools required are simple and it is something that they have all been exposed to. However, while it is easy to write it is very difficult to execute - especially if you have not exercised it much before. The three individuals in charge of our destiny have all been successful through skill, combined with their own leadership styles - that are primarily based on using their charisma to inspire.
When things aren't going to plan they need to analyse the situation and determine why the current plan is not working and how to fix it. That is very difficult to do mid game as the mind is focussed on the present. But, if something can be forseen, it can be planned for, so a change can be executed as simply as a play is called. It is simply a rehearsed contingency plan. Here's a couple of simple examples:
Opposition Line speed
- Strength - cuts decsion making time and shuts down shifts
- Critical vulnerability - ability to turn and chase
- Reaction - kick short over or through the line, 40/20
Opposition Dominant Middle
- Strength - Stops attacking momentum with dominant hits and slow ruck speed
Critical Vulnerability - Lateral movement and fatigue
- Reaction - Switch the point of attack wider to move the defenders laterally and attack their inside shoulder with late footwork and exploit lateral movement using hooker and fullback.
These are simple changes that can be preplanned, rehearsed and executed quickly to overcome our obvious lack of on field decsion making under pressure. Once these are developed and known it also becomes easier for the captain to make on the run decisions - hey guys were going to do X for the next three sets to see if we can't win back momentum - if not we will revert back to the game plan. Johnno I need you to....
Right now, it feels like we’re watching a tragic drama with no plot twist in sight. If Api and Luai can't develop the ability to adapt on the run - it will not matter how big, fast or determined the players we buy in - if we don't improve our smarts (leadership) we aren't improving our ladder positon.