cochise, you say HBG isn't carrying the load yet also claim the largest form of funding comes from the Wests Tigers...not HBG.I addressed all the important parts, the HBG, is not carrying the load. The largest form of funding for the Wests Tigers come from the Wests Tigers and not the HBG, we got board reform and the club is trying to become self sufficient.
That's a contradiction worth unpacking.
The fact is to my understanding, HBG is the financial engine behind Wests Tigers, whether you want to credit it or not.
Their venues generate significant revenue, particularly through pokies and hospitality that's channeled into the club.
Unless your suggesting Wests Tigers have somehow spun up an entirely independent income stream post reform [which hasn't been demonstrated publicly] your assertion doesn't hold.
To say "Wests Tigers are funding Wests Tigers" is circular.
Where do you think the clubs $$$ originates?
Without HBG's contributions... player development, pathways, and core operations would be threadbare.
That's not just my opinion...it's observable reality.
If you're advocating for self sufficiency, fantastic...but don't rewrite the current structure to suit the narrative.
A roadmap away from pokies dependence requires transparency, alternative revenue sources, and strategic partnerships.
Until then, dismissing HBG as non contributing is misleading at best.