CEO - Shane Richardson

Status
Not open for further replies.
4 Independents including the Chair and 1 rep from each of the ownership groups.
But all the independent 2ND-ROUND nominees identified by the recruitment company required the HBG rubber stamp before they were appointed (after Romero had aborted the initial process).

Burgess remains the sole common denominator - with Montgomery - Romero etc also becoming victims of HBG's revolving internal politics.

@tig_prmz
 
Well you have absolutely no idea how many times I’ve contacted them.

Which isn’t very many over the 2 years.

You’ve made assumptions about that and me and you’re quite wrong.

Our club does not care that members are interested in sponsoring an NRLW player.

You can make all the excuses you can think of, but that’s the lay of the land.

They certainly used to tell us members that they’d respond but they don’t bother anymore.

And in a couple of months time, they’ll be on their knees again for members.

This is life under Shane Richardson and his administration and we are going to have to get our heads around it.
Most members haven't emailed the club even once mate. Not once!

You have post history revealing what you'd been saying to the club. Ripping into coach and CEO. I think you were even giving coaching/team pointers. There was a point they simply stopped responding to you. It's probably too much mate. Not many agree with your takes on here, so I doubt the club has much time for it either after you've gotten your point across the first couple of times. It's a fairly big sample size...perhaps ypu should rethink some of your positions.
 
Most members haven't emailed the club even once mate. Not once!

You have post history revealing what you'd been saying to the club. Ripping into coach and CEO. I think you were even giving coaching/team pointers. There was a point they simply stopped responding to you. It's probably too much mate. Not many agree with your takes on here, so I doubt the club has much time for it either after you've gotten your point across the forst couple of times. It's a fairly big sample size...perhaps ypu should rethink some of your positions.
Yep!

1752918478593.png

You're persona non grata @TSP - for good reasons!
 
But all the independent 2ND-ROUND nominees identified by the recruitment company required the HBG rubber stamp before they were appointed (after Romero had aborted the initial process).

Burgess remains the sole common denominator - with Montgomery - Romero etc also becoming victims of HBG's revolving internal politics.

@tig_prmz
The process didn't get to the nomination phase in the 1st attempt, The HBG were not happy that they didn't appoint the recruitment company. They conducted a search for a new recruitment company, the HBG then appointed the same recruitment company that was originally chosen.
 
But all the independent 2ND-ROUND nominees identified by the recruitment company required the HBG rubber stamp before they were appointed (after Romero had aborted the initial process).

Burgess remains the sole common denominator - with Montgomery - Romero etc also becoming victims of HBG's revolving internal politics.

@tig_prmz
What incentive does HBG have by putting more money into WT if the profits will only be re-invested as per the review?
 
The process didn't get to the nomination phase in the 1st attempt, The HBG were not happy that they didn't appoint the recruitment company. They conducted a search for a new recruitment company, the HBG then appointed the same recruitment company that was originally chosen.
I know...

1752919278717.png
 
  • Haha
Reactions: BZN
As has been stated by a number of people in response to your posts, you went through the wrong channel emailing membership. They deal with memberships, not sponsorships. It doesn't matter that you are a member, they are there to deal with member enquiries about membership, there are correct ways of going about it, and with the issues that membership tends to have (which we all know about), they don't need to deal with emails from people wanting the wrong thing, and thus it was either deliberately ignored, or lost in the sea of emails that they would get all the time.

The Roosters may have been a bit different, but again you saw that it had no response in the end. Which tells you it isn't the right way to go about it and as such try the right method.

So no matter what you want to say, or how you want to respond to people on here trying to tell you the way to do it (no matter how harsh they might be, though that is more a reaction to the constant putting down of the club or them that you are doing - though their putting you down is also not fair), or the fact that the negative posts are now just starting to act like you had not actual intention to sponsor anyone, and just wanted to stir up negativity on here, which ever it is, just let it go on the posts in here or if you really want to sponsor a player, follow the correct processes, listen to those who are actually in the know.

But if you just want to cause drama, move on, because that is not the actions of an actual fan (let alone a member of the club) and is just derailing threads that have far more important things to discuss.
Well said...spot on.100%
 
Why have you been abusing me for 2 days, actually longer.

Would you like me to do it to you?
Me agreeing with another poster is not abuse

Your constant frivilous claims of bullying...a very serious issue...are not valid and do nothing but harm those that are TRUE victims of bullying.
You threatened me last night...so youve already started on me.

Why do you ignore the advise on the correct way for sponsorhip?
We all know why.
 
other than an ambition to oversee a succesful NRL team....


View attachment 25794

Same applies for private ownership though!
Not saying that we should have private ownership.

Really trying to figure out what needs to happen for us to be succssful.

Hundreds of pages down, it took me a while to understand our biggest issue is that we have no money. For years, I used to think our issue is a halfback, coach, hooker etc..

I kept thinking we are a couple of years away, but really we are like a decade away from matching what other teams are doing..
 
Richo was in charge at Souths and was on the side that organised Russell Crowe and Peter Holmes Acourts privatisation bid. If we ever did privatise, it has to be to a consortium with very, very deep pockets. Perhaps if we're turning a profit we may look more attractive, though Hbg rejected Benny's consortium's bid to but us.

Benny is the 2nd last bloke i would want being involved in ownership of our club as great a footballer that he was he is a very disreputable man imho.
 
Not saying that we should have private ownership.

Really trying to figure out what needs to happen for us to be succssful.


Hundreds of pages down, it took me a while to understand our biggest issue is that we have no money. For years, I used to think our issue is a halfback, coach, hooker etc..

I kept thinking we are a couple of years away, but really we are like a decade away from matching what other teams are doing..
I understand - just noting there is no panacea via change of ownership.

Success is driven by the tribalistic desire to win at all costs for a club/area/fanbase from the front office down - that has always been the case!
 
Like the fact you email sponsorship about sponsorships and email memberships about memberships.
No, membership and sponsorship should have sorted it out between them.

If they can’t do that, it shows how dysfunctional the club is.

It’s not a big ask.

But we can’t manage it, because the joint is poorly managed.

It could be costing them money now.

Obviously they couldn’t be assed.
 
So the roosters are goneski and I’ve done two Sydney clubs, so I think it’s time to see what a regional or interstate club does with the problem.

Will they respond? If so, how fast and how meaningfully?
 
Benny is the 2nd last bloke i would want being involved in ownership of our club as great a footballer that he was he is a very disreputable man imho.
100%, saying no to him and his mates was a great decision, heaps of people were suggesting back then that Benny and his mates were trying to get there hands on us to shift us off to Perth. Iv no idea, but am glad he got rejected. We need someone or a consortium that understand what is required and has ample funds to throw at us.
 
I understand - just noting there is no panacea via change of ownership.

Success is driven by the tribalistic desire to win at all costs for a club/area/fanbase from the front office down - that has always been the case!
Very true, we could privatise to a group who goes broke or borrows the money and has no money to reinvest in us, pretty much leaving us with a lack of funding anyway.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Staff online

Back
Top