They should fight the charge and try and lose.
Wins all round; Seyfarth removes all prior loading and we don't have to see him on the field for the rest of the year!
In the fair dinkum stakes, to have him cop that charge and Crichton zero is just the NRL protecting their own call.
Slipping or not, Crichton engaged in moderate to high force contact as he crouched and launched into May aggressively, which would've been a great shot... if May didn't slip. But we've been told all along that the onus is on the defending player, considering the conditions, maybe he should've shown more care for what could happen with a tackle like that.
Seyfarth's force was less, despite having no excuses and getting him flush, but with less impact.
Sua'ali'i on Walsh in Origin last year showed that slipping means zero.
So it seems hard to argue that Crichton hasn't been lucky, particularly in direct comparison to Seyfarth's charge, both on and off field.
If it is just the case that the officials have since adjusted to allow for more leniency in the case of a falling player, and this is a permanent and consistent change to how they're judged moving forward, then I can live with that.