So they take full responsibility for the clubs failings over the last 12 years or so?They own the club.
They can sack whoever they want to sack 🤷♂️
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So they take full responsibility for the clubs failings over the last 12 years or so?They own the club.
They can sack whoever they want to sack 🤷♂️
If you are so thick that you can't see how much uproar and division this has created, it just reinforces that you sit on the side of Wests and are not part of a United Wests tigers, making people like you the problem.. You'll all be dead in 10 - 20 years anyway and the magpie will die with you guysI don’t think sacking four boardroom members is going to kill too many kiddies 🤷♂️
I wouldn’t bet on it.I’m sure the legal people ticked off on it before the axe started swinging 👍
If the 90% owners of the club want the reserve team called the Wests Magpies is that such a major issue ?apparently now it is being reported Richardson had put forward a proposal to change the wests magpies nsw cup team to Wests Tigers
apparently hbg were not happy with that proposal
If they returned it would be one of the greatest comedies of all time, imagine them rolling out a team and getting lapped by 60 each week like the dark old days.Regarding the Magpies returning. If that was off the back off some democratically elected representatives at HBG level with market tested data saying it was good for the club, then sure. Do it. Thats how it should work.
The core of all our problems is the debenture system. Getting rid of that is the only way for us to not repeat this time and time again.
You can take me literally and deny the problems all at the same time, bravo 👏I don’t think sacking four boardroom members is going to kill too many kiddies 🤷♂️
We’re probably not going to get 100% agreement but my final word on the subject is, if you are referring to Magpie supporters who want Wests back in the NRL as “Magpie dinosaurs”, I have no problem with your description. It’s just not clear to me from reading your posts.On the contrary, I am very careful with my comments and don’t just ‘spray’ them around.
I was very clear it was aimed at the Wests dinosaurs actively trying t disrupt the club and turn it back into the Magpies.
You shouldn’t be upset unless you’re one of them.
If you’re upset with the ‘dinosaurs’ tag you can take solace in the fact I also wear the label.
Records are kept on all board meets , who attends , minutes of meetings , the lot , we recorded our board meetings so there was no mistakes on who said what etc , if people don’t attend you can find that outreported by who?
That could be correct but why do you sack BOF and the other independents for that?apparently now it is being reported Richardson had put forward a proposal to change the wests magpies nsw cup team to Wests Tigers
apparently hbg were not happy with that proposal
25 years on the minute the home jersey has some gold in it he doesn't like it.If you are so thick that you can't see how much uproar and division this has created, it just reinforces that you sit on the side of Wests and are not part of a United Wests tigers, making people like you the problem.. You'll all be dead in 10 - 20 years anyway and the magpie will die with you guys
the article mentioned Richo had proposed it, not Barry.That could be correct but why do you sack BOF and the other independents for that?
I don’t think it’s a question on who has attended the Wests Tigers board meetings, it’s a question of whether topics that should have been brought to those meetings were done so before being rubber stamped by the now ex-chairman.Records are kept on all board meets , who attends , minutes of meetings , the lot , we recorded our board meetings so there was no mistakes on who said what etc , if people don’t attend you can find that out
I understand that but if Richo proposed something that was unacceptable, you might deal with him but they sacked four directors, not Richo, I’d say, if it happened, it’s unrelated to this week’s fiasco.the article mentioned Richo had proposed it, not Barry.
that combined with the jersey and the potential loss of power by hbg the move was to sacked the 4 independents
you then have Lee H saying pascoe had suggested introducing some orange to the magpies nsw cup jersey and that got knocked on the head too
Richo wanted a united wests tigers so nsw cup team as wests tigers goes a long way to fixing the divide. if we did that we probably wouldn't have had the "tantrum" over the 2026 home jersey eitherIf the 90% owners of the club want the reserve team called the Wests Magpies is that such a major issue ?
Don’t tell me we would be more successful at NRL level if our reserve team was called Wests Tigers.
The Melbourne Storm have been the most successful NRL club for the past 20 years and they have not once had a reserve team called Melbourne Storm.
they obviously told richo that not be happening.I understand that but if Richo proposed something that was unacceptable, you might deal with him but they sacked four directors, not Richo, I’d say, if it happened, it’s unrelated to this week’s fiasco.
he would have gone to hbg and they put the brakes in itSo he didn’t just do it without consulting the owners ?
he would have gone to hbg and they put the brakes in it
Has it been confirmed this whole saga is over the 2026 home team jersey ?Richo wanted a united wests tigers so nsw cup team as wests tigers goes a long way to fixing the divide. if we did that we probably wouldn't have had the "tantrum" over the 2026 home jersey either
Has it been confirmed this whole saga is over the 2026 home team jersey ?
I know that is the agenda being pushed by the media and who knows if that was part of the hidden agenda or not, but the statement made by the HBG spokesperson did not mention any issue relating to the 2026 home jersey.