100% agree with all that.
Here's the thing. We talk about revisionist history in relation to the Magpies side of things on here a lot.
Recently- what has Balmain offered the JV? What have Wests offered the JV?
If I have to make a point, it's this- right NOW, the Wests Magpies/Ashfield/HBG side of things are doing most of the heavy lifting. It may not always be that way, there might even be agenda's on that side of the JV...that isn't the point.
If I was putting in 90% of the work into anything....and I wasn't happy with how the 'independent' side of the board were acting...feeling overlooked, or not consulted or whatever....chances are, I'd probably feel a little more entitled to swing it in my favour too.
HBG might be Darth Vader's cousin's best idea. Don't know.
But, them deciding that they would rather it more 'their way' at the moment isn't completely misunderstandable.
Here we are, kicking off about the money side of the JV doing things they want. The way I see it, they kind of have some right to do so.
Now, before I get bombarded with HBG apologist comments- I want to also point out, HBG have NOT said they want to move away from an independent board or CEO.
My point about the reaction on here being lead by hysteria seems to be overlooked.
WHAT IF....HBG hire 4 new independent board members & a CEO that isn't a stooge?
Shouldn't they get the chance to do that?
I know...they have history...their intent is obvious...I don't know what I'm talking about.
Rage on.