HBG, Independent Directors Sacked

Read again, I’m sayjng fans are expecting HBG to pour money into Wests Tigers, but not have any say in big decisions.
It is not realistic as anyone who pours money into a club will ensure they have a say in big decisions.
The reasoning being given is we have not been successful on the rugby league field, so they don’t have any right to be involved in big decisions because of it, but if we become successful they will be allowed to have their say ?
Of course they have a say in big decisions.
Hard to believe their lies about not being informed of the stadium issues when they had directors of HBG on the WestsTigers board.
As for becoming successful?
15 years of their inept failures proves they’re incompetent buffoons who shouldn’t be there.
If by some chance we do have succes it will be despite them… not because of them.
 
One man’s comments and actions or a few peoples comments and actions do not speak for everyone involved in a large organisation past and present.

Question 1:
Who was the one man who sacked all 4 independent directors? It wasn't one man...

Question 2:

Did the HBG board vote and pass the motion to sack the directors? Yes

As to whether these peolple speak for the organisation, let's look at the definition of their job title:

- The CEO is the highest ranking executive employee of the group and his role is to execute the strategy set by the board. His comments and actions speak for the entire organisation, that is literally what he is there to do..

- The directors role is to represent its members.. Their entire role to speak on behalf of the members...

Question 3:
So are you suggesting that the HBG CEO and board do not represent its members?

There is no way you can answer this post directly... Doing so means you will have to admit there is an issue with the HBG leadership and board. Can you bring yourself to do that?
 
Read again, I’m sayjng fans are expecting HBG to pour money into Wests Tigers, but not have any say in big decisions.
It is not realistic as anyone who pours money into a club will ensure they have a say in big decisions.
The reasoning being given is we have not been successful on the rugby league field, so they don’t have any right to be involved in big decisions because of it, but if we become successful they will be allowed to have their say ?

How much did they pour into the Wests Tigers in 2025 and aiming to do in 2026?
 
How much did they pour into the Wests Tigers in 2025 and aiming to do in 2026?
Wests Tigers Total income = $32million.

Wests Tigers Revenue Streams:
$6.514 million in sponsorship.
$19.652 million from NRL grants.
$3.308 million in ticketing.
$1.629 million in merchandise.

HBG contributed $1.75 million.

So roughly 5% of income came from HBG..

Hardly "pouring it in"...
Plus it's pokie money - what work did they actually do to deserve it?
 
Wests Tigers Total income = $32million.

Wests Tigers Revenue Streams:
$6.514 million in sponsorship.
$19.652 million from NRL grants.
$3.308 million in ticketing.
$1.629 million in merchandise.

HBG contributed $1.75 million.

So roughly 5% of income came from HBG..

Hardly "pouring it in"...
Plus it's pokie money - what work did they actually do to deserve it?
F pathetic imagine how much Laundy would be able to contribute.
 
Hmmmm ... looks like we Wests Tigers supporters were right to be worried all along. View attachment 31260
Suzie, you seem to love hanging about in the Western Suburbs camp.
You do realize there are extremists on every side of an argument.
Cherry picking incendiary stuff like this and presenting it as typical, is little more than dog whistling and IMHO not worthy of an admin.

But I'm sure you'll get the desired result
Queue ... outrage !!!
 
Suzie, you seem to love hanging about in the Western Suburbs camp.
You do realize there are extremists on every side of an argument.
Cherry picking incendiary stuff like this and presenting it as typical, is little more than dog whistling and IMHO not worthy of an admin.

But I'm sure you'll get the desired result
Queue ... outrage !!!
B2T, the page is run by Paul Stamo, one the most one eyed magpie supporters. He constantly tries to drive divison amongst the west tigers supporters and push the magpie agenda.

Why should Suzie not share this?

If you have an issue with those representing the Magpies, then maybe you should stop blaming the Wests tigers supporters for calling out their crappy actions and focus your energy on displacing the magpie representives with people who you feel represent you.

Until then, get used to it... Because we don't want these toxic people in our club.
 
Suzie, you seem to love hanging about in the Western Suburbs camp.
You do realize there are extremists on every side of an argument.
Cherry picking incendiary stuff like this and presenting it as typical, is little more than dog whistling and IMHO not worthy of an admin.

But I'm sure you'll get the desired result
Queue ... outrage !!!
Yeah it’s not dog whistling at all and the more you gloss over the shitty behaviour from HBG, the more you prove that you’re a HBG lackey.

Suzie is a phenomenal admin so you’re clearly just dribbling shit atm. If you don’t think the admin are worthy you’re welcome to just leave the forum and leave the rest of the actual Wests Tigers fans to discuss matters amongst ourselves.
 
As long as the crowds at LO sell out or have more attendance than CS it would be a pathetic business decision to reduce games there, besides at the present moment they win more games there something everyone on here will agree is the most important factor.

What board running the show in their right headspace would move games away from where the dollars are, how would that be in the interest of Wests Tigers.
Thats the S/W strategic plan though...we have a junior academy out there now...aligned with eagle vale sports high...it will be 7/3 LO/CSS
Increased corporates...a booming infrastructure and urban development...it makes sense in the long run
 

Latest posts

Staff online

Back
Top