HBG Directors give themselves Pay rise

Status
Not open for further replies.

It’s been dubbed ‘the most chaotic board in NSW’. But Wests Tigers’ owners are pushing for a pay rise

By Chris Barrett

March 7, 2026 — 4.21pm
Wests Tigers’ owners are bidding to give themselves a pay rise three months after a shambolic episode in which they sacked chairman Barry O’Farrell and three other directors before backflipping at the behest of the NRL.

The Holman Barnes Group, which owns 90 per cent of the Tigers and holds the licence for the NRL team, has for the past year been embroiled in turmoil that has threatened to spill over into the football club.

Now, its board members are seeking a boost which would see them collect more than their counterparts at most other Sydney clubs with ties to NRL teams.

HBG is proposing that its chairman’s annual honorarium be lifted from $51,341 to $65,000, the deputy chair’s fee to be raised from $33,371 to $50,000, and all other directors to get $32,500 instead of $25,670. All would also receive an extra $5000 if they sit on a club committee.

The effective $70,000 payment per annum for the chairman would eclipse the amounts paid to those in charge at most of Sydney’s major NRL-affiliated leagues clubs, including those with much larger membership bases.

Parramatta Leagues Club, which owns the Eels and has 65,000 members, gives its president $30,000 a year and other directors $20,000.

The 60,000-member Canterbury League Club, which is strongly linked to the Bulldogs and backs them financially, allows for a total of $229,801 to be paid to its seven directors including the chairman – an average of $32,828, although the chair and deputy chair receive a greater share.

St George Leagues Club, which owns 50 per cent of the Dragons and has 25,000 members, hands its chair $16,000 a year and ordinary directors $12,000, plus $2000 for each committee they sit on.

HBG has 27,000 members and the proposed honoraria for its board are exceeded only by those at Penrith NRL team owners Panthers Group, where total revenue was nearly $180 million in 2025 and which has a membership base of 148,000. The Panthers’ chairman receives $80,000 a year, its two deputies get $40,000 each and the remaining directors pick up $20,000 per annum.

Like those at other clubs, the HBG board members can take advantage of other perks of the position such as food and drinks. At the club’s annual general meeting on March 21 members will also be asked to approve its chairman and deputy receiving $500 per month hospitality cards.

As Holman Barnes Group’s business has expanded, the workload and governance responsibilities placed on directors have increased substantially,” said HBG vice-chairman Frank Primerano, who also sits on the Wests Tigers board.

“The proposed adjustments simply bring board honorariums into line with the scale of the organisation and the time commitment required, particularly as directors are increasingly involved in committees and strategic projects during this period of significant growth and investment.”

A source familiar with the activities of HBG, speaking on the condition of anonymity, said: “How can the most chaotic board in NSW simultaneously become one of the highest paid?

“If the stipend for the board were based on performance then quite obviously these people would be getting a pay cut, not a pay day.”

HBG, which oversees venues including Wests Ashfield, returned a net profit of $11.9 million in 2025 after raking in $52 million from poker machines and recording overall revenue of $100 million, according to its annual report.

But the organisation has been plagued by dysfunction during the past 18 months, with several board members controversially removed and former NSW premier O’Farrell and three other independent directors then sensationally axed from the Tigers last December less than a year after they were installed following a governance review.

After concerns were raised by the NRL, HBG reinstated them days later and O’Farrell was Tigers chairman. But the club was forced into a costly payout to Tigers chief executive Shane Richardson, who resigned amid the boardroom chaos 18 months into a four-year contract, and settled out of court with former HBG director Rick Wayde, a key instigator of the Tigers review, after he was banned for eight years.

HBG, which owns the NRL team via its control of Wests Magpies, has since beefed up its representation on the Tigers board, giving it an effective majority.

While the Tigers are governed separately to their owners, NRL funding for the team flows through HBG.

According to its latest financial report, HBG received $20 million from the NRL in 2025 and owes $36 million to players and head coach Benji Marshall over the next five years.

HBG is unusual in that the balance of power lies with 20 so-called debenture holders, who choose the majority of its directors under a decades-old, undemocratic system.

Only two of nine board seats are directly elected by the wider membership and there will not be a ballot for those spots at this month’s AGM after one of the three nominations withdrew.

The two remaining are well known to HBG board members: Shannon Cavanagh, a director of Wests Magpies alongside HBG chairman Dennis Burgess and Primerano, and Aldo Di Mento, a director of APIA Leichardt FC – the inner-west soccer team in which HGB bought a stake last year and on whose board Primerano and HBG chief executive Daniel Paton also sit.
 
So what happens if we win the Premiership this season, will you still be focusing on the HBG ownership and Richo choosing to leave, or will you finally be over it ?

The point of my post was that you lot have your heads in the sand and cant acknowledge when someone makes mistake. So what does your pipe dream of winning the 2026 comp have to do with accountability?

Standard diversion tactic. Keep em coming princess.
 
That’s probably his best one.
He’s no longer part of Wests Tigers, stop talking about him and focus on the future, not the past.
King richo

Give this post a like if we should all hail king richo!!

Yeah the boys!!!

😂😂😂😍😍😍😍😋🫢🫢🫢😂😂🤩🤩🤩🤣🙃😍😄🤣😄🥰
 
King richo

Give this post a like if we should all hail king richo!!

Yeah the boys!!!

😂😂😂😍😍😍😍😋🫢🫢🫢😂😂🤩🤩🤩🤣🙃😍😄🤣😄🥰
Maybe you can create a Richo forum so you and your fellow worshipers can acknowledge him every day for the rest of you lives.
This is a Wests Tigers forum and he is no longer part of it.
You could also create a Wests Magpies and HBG obsession forum so you and your fellow stalkers can spend each day trolling to see what dirt you can find to paint them in a bad light.
 
Maybe you can create a Richo forum so you and your fellow worshipers can acknowledge him every day for the rest of you lives.
Sounds like a great idea!!

We are now reaping the rewards for his astuteness and ability to GSD.

If we win a premiership in the next few years it will all be because of him

Thank you shane, you are the wests tigers saviour
 
Maybe you can create a Richo forum so you and your fellow worshipers can acknowledge him every day for the rest of you lives.
This is a Wests Tigers forum and he is no longer part of it.
Still trying to work out what Richo has to do with Fallahs appalling behaviour over a long period...he's lucky he lasted this long tbh
 
Maybe you could educate us of his advocacy and support of Wests Tigers

Ive seen nothing from him to suggest any WTs support whatsoever
Ive only seen him direct abuse and disdain towards WTs supporters.

Id say Wests are better off without him.
His actions are extremely unprofessional...Magpies would be better with someone that understands tact, nous and decorum...not oafish year 9 high school level cringey dad joke intellect

Looks like a future without Fallah
Looks like you're wetting yourself over this, maybe it's time to change your diapers.
 
No I didn’t suggest that at all.
I’m suggesting anyone that continues to try and unnecessarily dig up dirt and cause trouble for the sake of it, is not doing it with the best interests of Wests Tigers rugby league club who are currently heading in a good direction.
At least you have a very good knowledge of all things rugby league which you demonstrate in some of your posts, but there are a few people who clearly lack general rugby league knowledge yet love getting involved in anything that could potentially cause trouble and effect Wests Tigers rugby league operation.

I think the same could be said to you. Defending HBG could be seen as not wanting the best for Wests Tigers. Actually I think its a fair argument that supporting HBG over having an independent board is very much demonstrating a lack of desire for Wests Tigers to be consistently successful and limit the bad press we seem to attract.
 
Looks like you're wetting yourself over this, maybe it's time to change your diapers.
I was wondering where you were....then right on cue you come to defend the indefensible. Kev the bloody lawyer and psychologist. 🤣 You old farts are hilarious 😂.

I think it's clear now that there is a coordinated effort behind the scenes to dampen any descent. It's like clockwork how you all fire in at the same time spewing utter bullshit. You blokes will say just about anything. 🤣
 
I think the same could be said to you. Defending HBG could be seen as not wanting the best for Wests Tigers. Actually I think its a fair argument that supporting HBG over having an independent board is very much demonstrating a lack of desire for Wests Tigers to be consistently successful and limit the bad press we seem to attract.
Firstly I have not ever said I am against an Independent board.
Secondly you are again assuming that every single person involved or associated with HBG have exactly the same opinion and thought process.
So when you are talking about HBG it could be anyone of a number of different people and different thought processes.
Thirdly while things are finally going well in the rugby league department, is there any real need for people to be snooping or stalking and trying to dig up dirt on anyone directly or indirectly involved with HBG ? You don’t find that childish?
 
Firstly I have not ever said I am against an Independent board.
Secondly you are again assuming that every single person involved or associated with HBG have exactly the same opinion and thought process.
So when you are talking about HBG it could be anyone of a number of different people and different thought processes.
Thirdly while things are finally going well in the rugby league department, is there any real need for people to be snooping and trying to dig up dirt on anyone directly or instilled ? You don’t find that childish?

I have not said every person involved in HBG have the same opinion as each other.
 
Sometimes the truth needs to be stated as much as sone people don’t like to hear it.
Like the truth in December? Or the truth about an old bloke posting inappropriate memes on a public account in the year 2026 (not 2006)? Or the truth about a director in his 70s following only fans girls? Or the truth about how many directors have been sacked and the trend with inept dinosaurs?

You want the truth.. you cant handle the truth!!
 

Attachments

  • truth.jpg
    truth.jpg
    26.7 KB · Views: 0
Well there are quite a few people who love posting on this topic who insinuate that is the case.
I’m glad to hear you are not one of them.
Life in general doesn't work that way and I certainly try to keep an open mind. And im hoping the future steps of the board we have are all positive. Am I confident about that? Well certainly not, as all we have to go off is the evidence of their success and failure of the past. I know you will point out the board members will be different from the past, but you are being niave to think they arent ensuring the ones they get involved are willing to do things the way HBG board wants.
 
Life in general doesn't work that way and I certainly try to keep an open mind. And im hoping the future steps of the board we have are all positive. Am I confident about that? Well certainly not, as all we have to go off is the evidence of their success and failure of the past. I know you will point out the board members will be different from the past, but you are being niave to think they arent ensuring the ones they get involved are willing to do things the way HBG board wants.
All valid and fair points.
I think PVL’s involvement had much more effect than some of us think it did, time will tell.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top