Tom Shines
Well-known member
Cool story.
Keep sooking about stuff that doesn’t matter though.
I suggest you are the one sooking big boy …
If “none of this matters” why are you here in the middle of the offseason multiple times a day?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Cool story.
Keep sooking about stuff that doesn’t matter though.
Wise move.Magpies and Balmain are not WT. To me they are the same as dogs fans who show up every now and then. Tolerable if civil, delete the accounts if they dont shut up or troll. It's a Wests Tigers forum not a general NRL forum.
There is no exemption from directors’ duties just because they are a club or non-profit. FACT.They're a non-profit. Every organisation in Australia is registered under the federal Corporations Act legislation. HBG is registered under a non-profit, no share capital model. Different to Wests Tigers Pty Ltd which is a for profit company.
ASIC has a minor role in non-profit administration compared to for profit companies. Directors duties are more narrow.
Clubs are regulated at the state level by Liquor & Gaming.
I don't know what to say other than he's frustrated and clutching. Gary was too polite to correct him.Did you listen to this pod?
This bloke reckons its good way...
I’m not. I check to see what’s going on at night.I suggest you are the one sooking big boy …
If “none of this matters” why are you here in the middle of the offseason multiple times a day?
I didn't say they were exempt. I said their duties are narrower and they are regulated by a different body.There is no exemption from directors’ duties just because they are a club or non-profit. FACT.
lol - just google -- "Are directors of non profits subject to ASIC in Australia"
Anyway it's fine.
You don't have to write in.
But don't cloud fact with fiction.
My lawyer has already drafted the letter and it's been used.
To be honest it sounds like you're protecting HBG directors for some reason.
I’m not. I check to see what’s going on at night.
For a week and a half the crap being said on here has been very entertaining.
People carrying on like the world was ending.
I find it interesting.
For some the end is closer than others. That's life.I’m not. I check to see what’s going on at night.
For a week and a half the crap being said on here has been very entertaining.
People carrying on like the world was ending.
I find it interesting.
Why make light of that?Nice …although shouldn’t you go somewhere else to talk about the millions displaced and dying in those wars ?
worlds not ending but in a rugby league sense, on a rugby league forum, our position as a club is unprecedented. So not something to be taken lightly in my humble opinion. Obviously others agree.I’m not. I check to see what’s going on at night.
For a week and a half the crap being said on here has been very entertaining.
People carrying on like the world was ending.
I find it interesting.
ASIC regulates all companies limited by guarantee, including non-profits like HBG’s entities.I don't know what to say other than he's frustrated and clutching. Gary was too polite to correct him.
ASIC can only intervene in very serious circumstances. Think trading while insolvent, fiduciary duties, fraud etc. Incompetence and infighting can't be investigated by ASIC...it's somewhat normal and expected that company infighting will occur between partners.
If we stop and think for a second, ASIC does not issue club licences...Liquor & Gaming does. They are the one responsible for regulating those licensees. Not ASIC.
Not sure what he's smoking, but it's obviously a strong batch.
That’s almost worth a poll, who would supporters prefer, HBG or The Door… It’s a real coin flip.Imagine how many Issac Moses rejects we will end up with if Backdoor Benny ended up back in the joint. I can’t believe anyone in the HBG thought that was a good idea. Ludicrous.
Why make light of that?
That’s such a strange argument.
Fair enough, but as others have said, wait and see what happens before jumping to the extreme negatives.worlds not ending but in a rugby league sense, on a rugby league forum, our position as a club is unprecedented. So not something to be taken lightly in my humble opinion. Obviously others agree.
Perth Bears.That’s almost worth a poll, who would supporters prefer, HBG or The Door… It’s a real coin flip.
Clearly….lolit’s an argument you have put forward … I think I care about those things as much as you do ..
Did you listen to this pod?
This bloke reckons its good way...
Ok so let me grant you a world where ASIC is the sole interventionist for all clubs in Australia.ASIC regulates all companies limited by guarantee, including non-profits like HBG’s entities.
ASIC states explicitly that directors of non-profit companies have “the same legal duties and responsibilities as directors of other companies” — including s180, s181, s182, s183 and s191.
Liquor & Gaming NSW regulates club operations, but it does not replace or diminish ASIC’s jurisdiction over directors’ duties, misuse of position, conflicts of interest, or governance decisions causing corporate harm.
ASIC action against non-profit directors is common. The duties are not narrower — they are exactly the same under the Corporations Act.
ASIC has real, serious powers if it finds a breach of directors’ duties — and these powers apply equally to companies limited by guarantee (like HBG’s clubs) as they do to for-profit companies.
What ASIC can do if they find a breach
Here’s the clean version:
✔ Disqualify HBG directors (ban from all boards)
✔ Impose civil penalties
✔ Order compensation
✔ Enforce governance reforms
✔ Appoint investigators/examiners
✔ Refer to Liquor & Gaming NSW
✔ Refer to NRL or Police where relevant
And they do use these powers — especially with clubs and charities.
Thats what asics are there to look forOk so let me grant you a world where ASIC is the sole interventionist for all clubs in Australia.
For the sake of argument, you've copy and pasted some AI, but you haven't identified which regulation they have breached to justify ASIC intervention.
That's what I want to know.
Mate - they intervene when directors breach there duties.Ok so let me grant you a world where ASIC is the sole interventionist for all clubs is Australia.
For the sake of argument, you've copy and pasted some AI, but you haven't identified which regulation they have breached to justify ASIC intervention.
That's what I want to know.