HBG, Independent Directors Sacked

Status
Not open for further replies.
Here's one possibility

The NRL interviewed all 4 sacked board members yesterday. The story doesn't look good for HBG particularly with the false reasoning.

NRL steps in to broker a peace deal and return things back to how they were.

In the NRL mind, it is minimal use of power to reinstate a working system. Job done and resolved swiftly.

Unfortunately, it leaves the structure that allowed it to happen in the first place in tact.

My take - The NRL interviewed the Independent Directors yesterday … I assume the NRL met with the HBG boys today and quickly determined the whole story they were pushing was a bill of goods …when confronted the HBG boys started backpedaling a million miles an hour with plans for the Benji extension and they probably got hit with having to bring back BOF at a weak moment …you would think the NRL would have asked BOF the day before if he was interested in returning…

I doubt BOF is going to be going back if it’s more of the same …and he can be fired again the first Tuesday next month..

I don’t particularly care if HBG retains the ownership…just that their power is curbed and independents can be the primary decision makers in the running of the Football club.,,
 
My take - The NRL interviewed the Independent Directors yesterday … I assume the NRL met with the HBG boys today and quickly determined the whole story they were pushing was a bill of goods …when confronted the HBG boys started backpedaling a million miles an hour with plans for the Benji extension and they probably got hit with having to bring back BOF at a weak moment …you would think the NRL would have asked BOF the day before if he was interested in returning…

I doubt BOF is going to be going back if it’s more of the same …and he can be fired again the first Tuesday next month..

I don’t particularly care if HBG retains the ownership…just that their power is curbed and independents can be the primary decision makers in the running of the Football club.,,
I tend to agree with this.
 
He's paid to do a job, what's the issue?

You're making it sound like he abandoned us when he all know he was pushed out.. you are smart enough to know that.


How do you know for a fact he received hundreds of emails?

Did you not listen to the press conference (that he organised himself) where he thanked the fans?

In what world does an outgoing CEO reply to 100s of fan emails? No one in their right mind should have been expecting a reply.


If he didn't care he wouldn't have conducted himself the way he did in the press conference that he organised.

One could argue he was playing the game and was just pulling the right strings for public perception...

But he comes across as genuine and passionate. I believe he believes what he said.

Richo might not bleed WT like we do, but he is exactly what we needed at the time we signed him.
I was as excited as anyone else when it was first confirmed he was coming on board with Wests Tigers.
I saw things that gave me reason to believe he was not 💯 genuine long before the events of the past couple of weeks.
We will just have to agree to disagree on our opinions of how genuine he has been.
 
Here's one possibility

The NRL interviewed all 4 sacked board members yesterday. The story doesn't look good for HBG particularly with the false reasoning.

NRL steps in to broker a peace deal and return things back to how they were.

In the NRL mind, it is minimal use of power to reinstate a working system. Job done and resolved swiftly.

Unfortunately, it leaves the structure that allowed it to happen in the first place in tact.
Add to that possibility

Denny gets punted before Saturday and wears the brunt of the backlash for what’s happened so far this week? 🤞
 
I have a letter that fans can forward if they wish to - which states facts and which areas of the law they apply to.

And you do not know if they have or haven't. Thats up to ASIC to decide.
They're a non-profit. Every organisation in Australia is registered under the federal Corporations Act legislation. HBG is registered under a non-profit, no share capital model. Different to Wests Tigers Pty Ltd which is a for profit company.

ASIC has a minor role in non-profit administration compared to for profit companies. Directors duties are more narrow.

Clubs are regulated at the state level by Liquor & Gaming.
 
After reading the embarrassing attempts at logic by those puppets of HBG on this forum, may I suggest that the erstwhile controllers of this excellent vehicle for mostly sensible conversation, take a less generous tolerance to their bile. I for one, would like to see them banned for life and indeed in other times people like this where dealt with in the appropriate manner. I know that public floggings and the occasional guillotining is frowned upon these days (more the pity) but I think there is a very strong case for this in such dire times. For your consideration.
Magpies and Balmain are not WT. To me they are the same as dogs fans who show up every now and then. Tolerable if civil, delete the accounts if they dont shut up or troll. It's a Wests Tigers forum not a general NRL forum.
 
They're a non-profit. Every organisation in Australia is registered under the federal Corporations Act legislation. HBG is registered under a non-profit, no share capital model. Different to Wests Tigers Pty Ltd which is a for profit company.

ASIC has a minor role in non-profit administration compared to for profit companies. Directors duties are more narrow.

Clubs are regulated at the state level by Liquor & Gaming.
There is no exemption from directors’ duties just because they are a club or non-profit. FACT.
lol - just google -- "Are directors of non profits subject to ASIC in Australia"
Anyway it's fine.
You don't have to write in.
But don't cloud fact with fiction.
My lawyer has already drafted the letter and it's been used.
To be honest it sounds like you're protecting HBG directors for some reason.

The Holman Barnes Group (Western Suburbs Leagues Club Limited), which has ABN 69 000 154 736, is a registered company with the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC),

ASIC Registration (Company): As a company, the Holman Barnes Group is required to be registered with ASIC under the Corporations Act 2001. You can find their company details (ACN 000 154 736) on the ASIC registers via the ABN Lookup website.


ASIC regulates all companies limited by guarantee, including non-profits like HBG’s entities.
ASIC states explicitly that directors of non-profit companies have “the same legal duties and responsibilities as directors of other companies” — including s180, s181, s182, s183 and s191.
Liquor & Gaming NSW regulates club operations, but it does not replace or diminish ASIC’s jurisdiction over directors’ duties, misuse of position, conflicts of interest, or governance decisions causing corporate harm.


ASIC action against non-profit directors is common. The duties are not narrower — they are exactly the same under the Corporations Act.
 
Last edited:
Did you listen to this pod?
This bloke reckons its good way...
I don't know what to say other than he's frustrated and clutching. Gary was too polite to correct him.

ASIC can only intervene in very serious circumstances. Think trading while insolvent, fiduciary duties, fraud etc. Incompetence and infighting can't be investigated by ASIC...it's somewhat normal and expected that company infighting will occur between partners.

If we stop and think for a second, ASIC does not issue club licences...Liquor & Gaming does. They are the one responsible for regulating those licensees. Not ASIC.

Not sure what he's smoking, but it's obviously a strong batch.
 
I suggest you are the one sooking big boy …

If “none of this matters” why are you here in the middle of the offseason multiple times a day?
I’m not. I check to see what’s going on at night.
For a week and a half the crap being said on here has been very entertaining.
People carrying on like the world was ending.
I find it interesting.
 
There is no exemption from directors’ duties just because they are a club or non-profit. FACT.
lol - just google -- "Are directors of non profits subject to ASIC in Australia"
Anyway it's fine.
You don't have to write in.
But don't cloud fact with fiction.
My lawyer has already drafted the letter and it's been used.
To be honest it sounds like you're protecting HBG directors for some reason.
I didn't say they were exempt. I said their duties are narrower and they are regulated by a different body.

I didn't mean to upset you. I simply asked under what ground do you think ASIC can intervene over the top of Liquor & Gaming?

What law did they break?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Back
Top