Will you be attending the Save the Wests Tigers March?

Will you be attending the Save the Wests Tigers rally?

  • Yes, I care about the future of Wests Tigers

    Votes: 68 35.1%

  • No, it's just not possible for me to get there but I would if I could

    Votes: 120 61.9%

  • No, I support Wests Magpies not Wests Tigers

    Votes: 2 1.0%

  • No, I don't care about the future of the Wests Tigers

    Votes: 4 2.1%
  • Total voters
    194
Status
Not open for further replies.
Rock Hopper Steve said:
My solution would be not to boycott Tigers home games in fact the opposite, fill them out and at half time or full time let HBG know how pissed we are.

HBG out rally call all year and let them stew in the press week after week until it wears them down or someone with influence finally acts.
Click to expand...
For those who feel strongly about it, that’s the best course of action.
 
Tommy_the_Tiger said:
As far as I'm aware, the only NRL CEO salary you can be sure of is the Broncos CEO as they're a publicly listed entity. He is on about 700 per the last financial report (likely more than that per this years performance).

The HB Group grant to the club per the last report was 1.7m, the NRL grant is 21m. So the NRL are effectively paying the CEOs salary.
Click to expand...
It's like over paying players no one in their right mind who has achieved some career credibility will come to this club without being remunerated.
We are a career killing club - off the field and on- and yet some are still choosing to back the process.

Richardson bought us some credibility and he took control to do it.
HBG directors still were too concerned about the black and white instead of the here and now - playing out of Leichardt, and the orange in the jersey thorns in their side - yet celebrated by the fans.
Now we go into another season with distractions off the field and innuendo about players not being able to advance their careers at this club. Loyalty to coaches will not build a squad that can compete - successful clubs do that.
 
Kelce68 said:
😆

You joined on Tuesday...

You're still carrying on, trying to downplay the support.

We're aware of what you and your other social media cronies have been trying to do.

You must have been assigned the 'Wests Tigers Forum' to muddy the waters and sow discontent.

Stamo, Marky Mac, Pies Dennington, which one are you?

Numpties, aye 😆
Click to expand...
Keeping us all cranky was a good strategy 😅
 
Kelce68 said:
😆

You joined on Tuesday...

You're still carrying on, trying to downplay the support.

We're aware of what you and your other social media cronies have been trying to do.

You must have been assigned the 'Wests Tigers Forum' to muddy the waters and sow discontent.

Stamo, Marky Mac, Pies Dennington, which one are you?

Numpties, aye 😆
Click to expand...
Bahahahahah piers dennington...ill pay that
 
bigsiro said:
@simonsatiger I feel the same.
Keen to get a fuller understanding.

Interesting that you reference storming the bastille. That was an emotional reaction which gathered mass hysteria, prompting actions. All ultimately founded on incorrect assumptions.
Click to expand...
Here's another metaphor...Burgess was the trojan horse on the WT that masterminded the takeover.
 
LiverpoolTiger said:
Never knew I had to subscribe totally to a certain viewpoint. Is this a forum prerequisite?


I must admit the forum is addictive and I've spent a little time going through the threads. However, it seems they are dominated by just a few users who seem to browbeat everyone who doesn't adhere to a certain narrative...................................even if like me they are supportive but hold nuanced views.

You also seem like this.

There also seems quite a toxic element of people who are just pushing their view and their ego.

This isn't what most fans feel.

I note only about 150 people attending or would attend if they could. That isn't a mass movement and just small scale and divisive, I'm happy with the changes decided for stability but seems a small minority on here want more instability.
Click to expand...
Isn't it interesting how supportive people were about all the stability we had, then HBG blow all that stability up and then people who want to return to the previous stability are being accused of wanting instability?
 
Rock Hopper Steve said:
Sometimes I feel they come on here with the intention of trying to convert the place into a magpie's utopia, do they think we are F twelve.
Click to expand...
I can tell when it's because of a lack of research.

Chad started questioning Epifania and surely he can be independent of HBG thought, but he hadn't done the research that he was a debenture holder and installed as Wests Magpies chairman in an HBG selected majority board.

This other poster is the same...forms an opinion on 50% of the information.
 
weststigers said:
Isn't it interesting how supportive people were about all the stability we had, then HBG blow all that stability up and then people who want to return to the previous stability are being accused of wanting instability?
Click to expand...
That much so that our head coach was just shaking his head about the unnecessaryness of it all in his extension presser.

If you read his body language, he’s as confused as us supporters are. Confirmed point blank that the decision was made for stability because of instability created by ownership.

Just wow.
 
Vicious said:
I’m not making anything up, I keep pointing out that PVL has spoken with everyone involved in this recent drama and has put in strict guidelines regarding how we move forward, but many of our supporters are still not happy.
I have also pointed out that if the rumours are true and BOF and 2 other independent board members have agreed to return, they would surely not be doing that if they knew they were going to constantly be outnumbered, outvoted and have no say.
In addition to this many people like to bring up lack of funding to our rugby league department.
I stated, we had an extremely highly paid CEO who I’m near certain was by far the highest paid across the entire NRL. Where does that money come from ? Doesn’t that eat into the rugby league department expenditure?
That being the case, I’m not sure how some people continue to try and say we have been skimping on costs relating to our rugby league department.
Click to expand...
He had been skimping on the football department until an independent review came along, Richo was appointed and then $ went into the football team, including Richo’s salary. Its because of this investment that we managed a profit for the first time in years!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Members online

Total: 785 (members: 37, guests: 748)
Back
Top