Rock Hopper Steve
Well-known member
It's as simple as this, what's good for the Magpies isn't necessary the best thing for Wests Tigers.Yeah that was exactly my point. Sydney Roosters are 100% run by Sydney Roosters people.
Wests Tigers are 90% run by Western Suburbs Magpies people. Why should they be run predominantly by Western Suburbs Magpies people and not Wests Tigers people? I understand having the club run by a mix of Balmain and Magpies in its initial years but it’s been 25 years now. Just because they have 90% control doesn’t mean it should be that way.
Said earlier today the board should consist of,
4 independents
3 wests tigers
1 magpies
1 balmain
That would be in the best interest of Wests Tigers but it would never happen unless HBG are dealt with.