3,2,1...

@ said:
@ said:
@ said:
@ said:
I thought nofo was terrible

Ran for 171m…40m more than anyone else in the team..and more than 5 of our forwards combined..

Chee Kam had better stats but don’t let that get in the way of blind love .

:laughing:

134m for the Chee according to NRL . com but he was good tonight as well can hold his head up..1st in honourable mentions..

17 hit ups for 166 meters
1 offload
25 tackles
80 mins
 
@ said:
@ said:
@ said:
@ said:
Chee Kam had better stats but don’t let that get in the way of blind love .

:laughing:

134m for the Chee according to NRL . com but he was good tonight as well can hold his head up..1st in honourable mentions..

…. And what did that pathetic pussy excuse for a prop, Packer get?

56m..but they do adjust them overnight… :laughing:

Christ… It looked like he made 16 of those when he almost made a break up Main St towards the end. He was close to the best prop in the comp early on. Now you'd consider swapping him for Ryan O'Hara
 
@ said:
@ said:
@ said:
@ said:
3 Sue
2 Marsters
1 Nofoaluma

Honourable mentions Chee-Kam Brooks Mataulino Thompson Garner ..

Naughty Corner..Everyone else..

I thought nofo was terrible

Ran for 171m…40m more than anyone else in the team..and more than 5 of our forwards combined..

Chee Kam had better stats but don’t let that get in the way of blind love .

:laughing:

On watching again you are right…I'm changing my 3,2,1..

3, Chee-Kam
2, Sue
1, Mataulino..
 
@ said:
@ said:
@ said:
@ said:
I thought nofo was terrible

Ran for 171m…40m more than anyone else in the team..and more than 5 of our forwards combined..

Chee Kam had better stats but don’t let that get in the way of blind love .

:laughing:

On watching again you are right…I'm changing my 3,2,1..

3, Chee-Kam
2, Sue
1, Mataulino..

You watched it again 😱pen_mouth:

You’re a glutten for punishment mate
 
Matulino
Really !!!

You guys must really be desperate
What did he do, got one offload away and belted a teenage half.

His runs are softer than Woods on a bad day, falls to the ground as soon as a finger is laid on him.
We must have been worse than I thought if he's getting 3 points.

I give him 3 points for soft
 
@ said:
I thought Sue and Garner were very good. Sue continues to push hard for a contract. It’s not like there’s anyone better out there atm. Give him another year, how can it hurt.

There’s a lot to like about Garner. 3 or 4 times Marshall almost put him through. It was only genuinely good tackles that stopped him. Looks a very good line runner.

Can’t really think of anyone else. MCK tried hard. He’s looked good the last few weeks.

Agree, Garner looking good. But hasn’t he been playing on the left all year? Yet we play him on the right in his first few games of FG and putt CheeKam on the left who has played a fair bit of right. Bit odd imo. Should have been straight swap for Lawrence to run off Brooks left.
 
@ said:
Matulino
Really !!!

You guys must really be desperate
What did he do, got one offload away and belted a teenage half.

His runs are softer than Woods on a bad day, falls to the ground as soon as a finger is laid on him.
We must have been worse than I thought if he's getting 3 points.

I give him 3 points for soft

Matulino
Runs 14
Meters 156
Offloads 2
Tackles 23
Minutes 49

He was pretty solid tbh

Still plays poor minutes compared to other NRL props .

Packer is puss though !
 
@ said:
Matulino
Really !!!

You guys must really be desperate
What did he do, got one offload away and belted a teenage half.

His runs are softer than Woods on a bad day, falls to the ground as soon as a finger is laid on him.
We must have been worse than I thought if he's getting 3 points.

I give him 3 points for soft

That is how bad the rest of those pretenders were …and at least he belted someone.
 
Matulino got over the advantage line nearly everytime.

3 - Matulino
2 - Sue
1 - MCK? - I don't know, noone else really had any impact.
 

Latest posts

Members online

Back
Top