smoking_gun
New member
@ said:@ said:@ said:@ said:This is a bit of a fairytail at Tigerland… We are terrible at building a roster, plus with history as the only true gauge, quality players dont seem to want to come to the club.
What if all we can attract are worse? Does it become a big deal then losing your best prop?
My point exactly.
If/when they sign packer matulino vete or players of similar standard woods will be a distant memory. Tigers problem isn't top quality players they have a few of those it's the depth to go along with it. I mean just look at the bench and team named this week.
If we think a player like Packer is going to improve us then we are fried. Woods isn't a great forward or Captain,and I couldn't care less if he goes, but he's better than Packer.
Yeah. But packer is gonna give u good out put for about half the price and allow tigers to make more signings in other key areas. I'm kinda getting over trying to explain how the majority of clubs evaluate players but all I can say is that I'm glad fans aren't in the position to decide on who is paid what.