innsaneink
Well-known member
meh
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
@innsaneink said:
@jirskyr said:@Tiger In The Gong said:I have added rounds 18 and 19 to the original data.
Our attack is now averaging 17.42 points a game - **The worst ever by a Wests Tigers team**.
Our defense is now averaging 24.36 points a game - **Only the 10th best for a Wests Tigers team**
\
\
So lets get this clear and cut all the spin -
***16th out of 16 in attack\
\
*10th out of 16 in defense.**
Is it any wonder we are coming dead last.
No this is incorrect. Everything I have posted in this thread is all results up to and including Round 19 vs Broncos.
We didn't even play Round 18, it was a bye.
Attack in 2015 is 14/16 of all seasons as measured by "Points For per game", defence is 6/16 for Points Against.
We are coming last 2015 for several reasons, and it is not just about points scored or conceded. Firstly, our losing margins are quite small, but they are consistent. I.e. we lose often but not by much = we are unable to convert close games into wins. That is the primary issue with our 2015 season: we either win big, or we lose.
We also happen to be caught in an unfortunately better performing bottom ladder.
For the past 5 seasons 2010-2014, the bottom placed side has totalled 5 or 6 wins (for 2010 Melbourne were moved to last due to salary cap, but 2nd last Cowboys only had 5 wins). We are obviously already on 5 wins with 7 games in hand.
Furthermore, the win % for bottom teams in 2015 is higher than any of the previous 5 seasons:
- bottom 4 teams win % 2010-2014 = 30.63%; in 2015 = 33.82%
- bottom 3 teams win % 2010-2014 = 28.33%; in 2015 = 33.33%
- bottom 2 teams win % 2010-2014 = 26.25%; in 2015 = 32.35%
In other words, the bottom 4 are doing better this year than any of the previous 5 years. Even further to this, the average difference between 8th and last for the previous 5 years was 0.55 table points per game. It is currently 0.47 table points per game, so we are closer to the Top 8 than last usually is.
So it's not just about Tigers doing badly in 2015, it is also that bottom-performing sides this year are doing better than they usually do.
It amuses me that you say "lets get clear and cut out the spin" and then proceed to spin/interpret the data the way you see fit.
Data is data, it is facts. Interpretation of data is always prone to bias; as others have said you may be able to support opposed arguments by selective interpretation of the same data.
But don't make the mistake of calling one argument "spin" and another "clear". All arguments about human behaviour are spin of one kind of another.
@magpiecol said:Facts will never convince the haters. Most of them, from what I have read, would not understand them anyway. They only understand instant gratification. Nothing else. Waiting for something? Forget it.
@jirskyr said:@innsaneink said:meh
I've known you to be more constructive than this - your apathy for 2015 reached its peak? Still taking time to comment though?
@NT Tiger said:Well argued jirskyr.
@stevetiger said:@magpiecol said:Facts will never convince the haters. Most of them, from what I have read, would not understand them anyway. They only understand instant gratification. Nothing else. Waiting for something? Forget it.
Come one. You can't say that. You just can't.
Are we last on the ladder ? Have had we had a dud season ?
You have no facts to back you up.
There are no haters. There are those who are judging the situation fairly and there are those with some bizarre agenda who are supporting our JT. Admit he has been terrible but hopefully he learns from everything that has happened and improves significantly next season. That is the best that we can hope for. Spinning the situation for some bizarre reason doesn't help anyone.
@innsaneink said:Talk about over analyzing things
You gotta.laugh
FTR there is no surprise results here…it's all here.
http://afltables.com/rl/rl_index.html
@jirskyr said:@stevetiger said:@magpiecol said:Facts will never convince the haters. Most of them, from what I have read, would not understand them anyway. They only understand instant gratification. Nothing else. Waiting for something? Forget it.
Come one. You can't say that. You just can't.
Are we last on the ladder ? Have had we had a dud season ?
You have no facts to back you up.
There are no haters. There are those who are judging the situation fairly and there are those with some bizarre agenda who are supporting our JT. Admit he has been terrible but hopefully he learns from everything that has happened and improves significantly next season. That is the best that we can hope for. Spinning the situation for some bizarre reason doesn't help anyone.
Surely Steve you understand the irony of your last paragraph? "There are no haters, there are only those judging fairly (i.e. me) and those with bizarre agendas". It is your opinion that you are judging fairly, it doesn't mean people who disagree with you are being unreasonable.
I think we have consensus that this is a crap season. The question is how bad season is it really, in context, and what are the causes?
You can't just say "admit he has been terrible". No, the results have been bad, but you don't really know how good a coach he is. This is especially true given only 1 year of observations with the Tigers (and only 5 seasons experience total).
Being a good coach should not simply be measured by # of wins, because there is more to winning than just who your coach is. Prime example is Wayne Bennett - 12th last year, first this year. Did the coach suddenly go from poor to great?
So I think col is saying that you need to give a coach time to produce the good performances. I happen to agree with this. Tim Sheens didn't get the Tigers to the finals in his first season, but he did get us there.
As to whether Tigers are improving, that is debatable. For # wins and table position, if that is all that counts, then no we are not currently improving. If you look at defence, well we are improving a fair amount. Attack has statistically improved a little.
@Tiger In The Gong said:The stats with a direct comparison Potter v Taylor rounds 1 to 19
Potter average points for = 21.17
Potter average points against = 28.35
Taylor average points for = 18.18
Taylor average points against = 22.53
Seems about right.
@Boonboon2 said:@Tiger In The Gong said:The stats with a direct comparison Potter v Taylor rounds 1 to 19
Potter average points for = 21.17
Potter average points against = 28.35
Taylor average points for = 18.18
Taylor average points against = 22.53
Seems about right.
Good to see someone else recognising JT is a much better coach then Potter
@Eddie said:Seriously I wish Taylor (and his stats men in here) would stop with the nauseating were improving and were going to ram these stats down your thraot to prove it. Better off just saying look were in last place, we need to do a better job.