Anasta grub

@Nelson said:
@GNR4LIFE said:
@Nelson said:
Just because it's his job doesn't mean people have to like it…does anyone hold back on parking inspectors? Those poor people don't even have a choice in how they go about doing their jobs and they cop it. He has a choice and he chooses to be take the opportunity to pursue his personal vendettas.

Also, if I put as little effort into a job as he put into playing for the Tigers then no, I would not be heard to complain about not being paid my full wage.

I take it you're not a lawyer, because you would be laughed out of court with that legal defence, ''He didn't earn it''. It doesn't matter what your perception is of whether he earned the money or not, the club were contractually obligated to pay the terms of his contract.

I'm well aware of what the legal position is with employment contracts. Just because people may have legal rights doesn't mean it is necessarily morally right to enforce them.

Doesn't matter what is ''morally right'' in business.
 
@Swordy said:
@GNR4LIFE said:
@Nelson said:
Just because it's his job doesn't mean people have to like it…does anyone hold back on parking inspectors? Those poor people don't even have a choice in how they go about doing their jobs and they cop it. He has a choice and he chooses to be take the opportunity to pursue his personal vendettas.

Also, if I put as little effort into a job as he put into playing for the Tigers then no, I would not be heard to complain about not being paid my full wage.

I take it you're not a lawyer, because you would be laughed out of court with that legal defence, ''He didn't earn it''. It doesn't matter what your perception is of whether he earned the money or not, the club were contractually obligated to pay the terms of his contract.

And they have. Not their fault his BS third party went bad. Not a court in the land that can convict the club on that charge.

Everything aside, you can operate in the media , and be in the know without dumping on people all the time. Professional courtesy means something to most. Its clear he has a vendetta and thatmis unprofessional. It will bite him eventually. And if you trust one person who leaks as if it is gospel, you will eventually sink when they do.

Depends if it was a club affiliated TPA, in which case it's everything to do with the WT.
 
@Geo. said:
@GNR4LIFE said:
@Nelson said:
Just because it's his job doesn't mean people have to like it…does anyone hold back on parking inspectors? Those poor people don't even have a choice in how they go about doing their jobs and they cop it. He has a choice and he chooses to be take the opportunity to pursue his personal vendettas.

Also, if I put as little effort into a job as he put into playing for the Tigers then no, I would not be heard to complain about not being paid my full wage.

I take it you're not a lawyer, because you would be laughed out of court with that legal defence, ''He didn't earn it''. It doesn't matter what your perception is of whether he earned the money or not, the club were contractually obligated to pay the terms of his contract.

The Club paid Anasta every cent..The money in dispute was a TPA outside of the Club…I'm assuming it settled because after the initial Media reports of him being owed money not a peep has been heard...If he was still owed you would think he would of taken legal recourse...

Which gives rise to think that if he is sticking the boot into the club over that, it would stand to reason that the club had some hand in introducing Anasta to that third party, in which case it becomes covered under the cap.
 
@Nelson said:
@GNR4LIFE said:
@Nelson said:
Just because it's his job doesn't mean people have to like it…does anyone hold back on parking inspectors? Those poor people don't even have a choice in how they go about doing their jobs and they cop it. He has a choice and he chooses to be take the opportunity to pursue his personal vendettas.

Also, if I put as little effort into a job as he put into playing for the Tigers then no, I would not be heard to complain about not being paid my full wage.

I take it you're not a lawyer, because you would be laughed out of court with that legal defence, ''He didn't earn it''. It doesn't matter what your perception is of whether he earned the money or not, the club were contractually obligated to pay the terms of his contract.

I'm well aware of what the legal position is with employment contracts. Just because people may have legal rights doesn't mean it is necessarily morally right to enforce them.

Legality and morality are not mutually exclusive. I hate the bloke too and I agree he stole a living here, but he signed the contract the club offered him, he's entitled to every dollar he signed on for. IMO, the club can pay him out in full for penance for being stupid enough to offer the contract to him in the first place.
 
@ricksen said:
Didn't see/hear this 'dirt' he's apparently dished, but it's fair to say he'd know. Still hangs out with Farah a fair bit, and is good friends with some of the older fellas in the team (e.g. he was at Moltzen's wedding a few mths back).

And yeah - he's not going to dish on the Roosters given he's on their payroll….

Uncle Nick would ask for his head on a plate if he did. Lol.
 
@Cultured Bogan said:
@Geo. said:
@GNR4LIFE said:
@Nelson said:
Just because it's his job doesn't mean people have to like it…does anyone hold back on parking inspectors? Those poor people don't even have a choice in how they go about doing their jobs and they cop it. He has a choice and he chooses to be take the opportunity to pursue his personal vendettas.

Also, if I put as little effort into a job as he put into playing for the Tigers then no, I would not be heard to complain about not being paid my full wage.

I take it you're not a lawyer, because you would be laughed out of court with that legal defence, ''He didn't earn it''. It doesn't matter what your perception is of whether he earned the money or not, the club were contractually obligated to pay the terms of his contract.

The Club paid Anasta every cent..The money in dispute was a TPA outside of the Club…I'm assuming it settled because after the initial Media reports of him being owed money not a peep has been heard...If he was still owed you would think he would of taken legal recourse...

Which gives rise to think that if he is sticking the boot into the club over that, it would stand to reason that the club had some hand in introducing Anasta to that third party, in which case it becomes covered under the cap.

Huh..Never said anything about Anasta sticking it to the Club over it…Just pointing out that the Club paid Anasta his contract Money...As for the TPA guess you would have to ask Mayer that one...Since we have heard nothing since you would assume it has been reconciled...
 
@Geo. said:
@Cultured Bogan said:
@Geo. said:
@GNR4LIFE said:
I take it you're not a lawyer, because you would be laughed out of court with that legal defence, ''He didn't earn it''. It doesn't matter what your perception is of whether he earned the money or not, the club were contractually obligated to pay the terms of his contract.

The Club paid Anasta every cent..The money in dispute was a TPA outside of the Club…I'm assuming it settled because after the initial Media reports of him being owed money not a peep has been heard...If he was still owed you would think he would of taken legal recourse...

Which gives rise to think that if he is sticking the boot into the club over that, it would stand to reason that the club had some hand in introducing Anasta to that third party, in which case it becomes covered under the cap.

Huh..Never said anything about Anasta sticking it to the Club over it…Just pointing out that the Club paid Anasta his contract Money...As for the TPA guess you would have to ask Mayer that one...Since we have heard nothing since you would assume it has been reconciled...

Never said you were Geo. Anasta seems to have an axe to grind with WT over monies owed. If all club dues are paid, and he still has the irrits with them over a "TPA," is that because the club had something to do with it when they shouldn't have?
 
@Cultured Bogan said:
@Geo. said:
@Cultured Bogan said:
@Geo. said:
The Club paid Anasta every cent..The money in dispute was a TPA outside of the Club…I'm assuming it settled because after the initial Media reports of him being owed money not a peep has been heard...If he was still owed you would think he would of taken legal recourse...

Which gives rise to think that if he is sticking the boot into the club over that, it would stand to reason that the club had some hand in introducing Anasta to that third party, in which case it becomes covered under the cap.

Huh..Never said anything about Anasta sticking it to the Club over it…Just pointing out that the Club paid Anasta his contract Money...As for the TPA guess you would have to ask Mayer that one...Since we have heard nothing since you would assume it has been reconciled...

Never said you were Geo. Anasta seems to have an axe to grind with WT over monies owed. If all club dues are paid, and he still has the irrits with them over a "TPA," is that because the club had something to do with it when they shouldn't have?

It would be great if the club told the third party not to pay him because he was hopeless. That would be great to hear and exactly what he deserved.
 
@Eddie said:
Now, I have got a very far, fetched conspiracy theory that you guys won't like….....

Anasta might be telling the truth!! He probbaly still talks to some of the boys I have no doubt. The place has been dysfunctional and a shambles, why should he sugar coat that?

In 2015 he tipped us to make the Top 8 and was willing us to win most weeks. He was very critical of performances and I believe rightly so.

We deserve our whack, until we start winning games. Nothing he said surprised me or made me think he had it in for the club.

He was a dud player when Sheens swopped on him in 2013! Not his fault really no one else was willing to sign him as they knew he was finished as a player.

I must have a bad memory. I remember him doing nothing but bagging us sine he left the club. He must be one of the most overated players in the history of the NRL. Only performances have been in sides that carried him, has never proven himself to be either a leader or a developer of talent. When you talk about fox vs channel 9, I will go with fox most times unless Anasta is part of the coverage. Shame 9 does not cover super Saturday.
 
@happy tiger said:
@Cultured Bogan said:
@Demps said:
He's a douche bag.
Garbage player with a big ego.
Needs to keep his mouth shut.

Why? He's a pundit now and he is close to players at the club, and having played for the club he knows how things work here.

Just cause you don't like the bloke or thought he thieved a living in his two years here, doesn't make what he says any less true.

I think he's close to one player at the club in particular CB

I don't understand why he is asked the question , of course he will show bias against us every time

If your going to have a creditable sports show , be credible and act credible , Braith is the Tommy Raudonikis ,Jeff Thomson , Dean Jones of that show

Just says stuff for effect , every chance he gets he is going to knife us in the back

And then to top it off , they ask him questions about the Roosters coaching staff and how Robinson will go

Cmon please ….. don't insult my intelligence

He is the Under 20's coach of that club

Fox and the DT run hand in hand

I don't think Tommy would ever slander the club that way.
 
@Chadman's Ghost said:
I'm not sure what people were expecting from Anasta in his time here.

He clearly wasn't signed in his prime, and for that- you can't actually blame him for some decline in his ability.

But in his 1st season he was horribly miscast, playing 2nd Row for a aging 5/8… what was the thinking there? My memory fades, but wasn't he signed by Sheens before he got dumped, and became Potter's guy?

I thought his 2nd season was much better, but by then the average fan had it in for him & every error he made was instantly worse than any other players similar error.

He also played for the club during what I can only describe as the most chaotic period in recent history for this club.

And then got stiffed on money.

It's not like we gave him an ideal ride here.

He's just another media guy now, but he is far from the worst chucklehead on TV.

I'm sure he has some knowledge of how the club is going internally, but I suspect that the new board & coaching staff are less 'involved' with the players than some previous coaches, so all this talk from players about the knives being out for Taylor- that just comes from the player bubble.

And quite frankly, if the players are carrying on like that still, then maybe a good cleanout of the bigger culprits isn't the worst thing this club could ever go through..

He was always a backrower, look at his build, especially when he gotr older and slower. Unfortunately he did not have the intestinal fortitude or work effort to play that position, and was more interested in being the pretty boy organiser. When the going got tough, Briath went missing
 
@GNR4LIFE said:
@larrycorowa said:
Can't stand the bloke….he is a nobody and that's operating him slightly

He played nearly 300 games, won a premiership, represented his state and country. Not bad for a nobody.

How many SOO games did NSW win with him in the side? He was overated and picked ahead of players that would have produced more than he ever could. He is the earlier version of Mitchell Pearce in NSW colours.
 
@stevetiger said:
@Cultured Bogan said:
@Geo. said:
@Cultured Bogan said:
Which gives rise to think that if he is sticking the boot into the club over that, it would stand to reason that the club had some hand in introducing Anasta to that third party, in which case it becomes covered under the cap.

Huh..Never said anything about Anasta sticking it to the Club over it…Just pointing out that the Club paid Anasta his contract Money...As for the TPA guess you would have to ask Mayer that one...Since we have heard nothing since you would assume it has been reconciled...

Never said you were Geo. Anasta seems to have an axe to grind with WT over monies owed. If all club dues are paid, and he still has the irrits with them over a "TPA," is that because the club had something to do with it when they shouldn't have?

It would be great if the club told the third party not to pay him because he was hopeless. That would be great to hear and exactly what he deserved.

Ordinary given how you felt about Farah's treatment, Steve.
 
@Cultured Bogan said:
@stevetiger said:
@Cultured Bogan said:
@Geo. said:
Huh..Never said anything about Anasta sticking it to the Club over it…Just pointing out that the Club paid Anasta his contract Money...As for the TPA guess you would have to ask Mayer that one...Since we have heard nothing since you would assume it has been reconciled...

Never said you were Geo. Anasta seems to have an axe to grind with WT over monies owed. If all club dues are paid, and he still has the irrits with them over a "TPA," is that because the club had something to do with it when they shouldn't have?

It would be great if the club told the third party not to pay him because he was hopeless. That would be great to hear and exactly what he deserved.

Ordinary given how you felt about Farah's treatment, Steve.

Ordinary ? Comparing Farah to Anasta for us is ordinary.
 
@Harvey said:
@GNR4LIFE said:
@larrycorowa said:
Can't stand the bloke….he is a nobody and that's operating him slightly

He played nearly 300 games, won a premiership, represented his state and country. Not bad for a nobody.

How many SOO games did NSW win with him in the side? He was overated and picked ahead of players that would have produced more than he ever could. He is the earlier version of Mitchell Pearce in NSW colours.

What's it matter? If you offered his career to any young player coming through, none of them would turn it down
 
@Harvey said:
@happy tiger said:
@Cultured Bogan said:
@Demps said:
He's a douche bag.
Garbage player with a big ego.
Needs to keep his mouth shut.

Why? He's a pundit now and he is close to players at the club, and having played for the club he knows how things work here.

Just cause you don't like the bloke or thought he thieved a living in his two years here, doesn't make what he says any less true.

I think he's close to one player at the club in particular CB

I don't understand why he is asked the question , of course he will show bias against us every time

If your going to have a creditable sports show , be credible and act credible , Braith is the Tommy Raudonikis ,Jeff Thomson , Dean Jones of that show

Just says stuff for effect , every chance he gets he is going to knife us in the back

And then to top it off , they ask him questions about the Roosters coaching staff and how Robinson will go

Cmon please ….. don't insult my intelligence

He is the Under 20's coach of that club

Fox and the DT run hand in hand

I don't think Tommy would ever slander the club that way.

Well you need to read Tommy's article in RLW in regards to Pearce
 
Gavet is at his 4th club in 4 years but Anasta singles out the Tigers that he's angry at for being cut . And they weren't even the last club to cut him !
 
Gavet is worse than Taupau.
Expect more sloppyness from him.
Shoulder charges, offsides, dropped balls, etc.
He's a scrub, let's get in his head so he messes up even more.
#NIGGLE
 
Braith crapped himself on the couch during the half-time review…no mention of disharmony between Coach and players tho...
 
Braith is talking rubbish….no disharmony there, maybe just coaches being brutally honest with players who aren't doing their job properly. It's called being a proper coach.
 

Latest posts

Members online

Back
Top