I mentioned this a few times last year as i know a couple of his close mates. I mentioned it early in the pre season that Braith was owed money and was dirty on the club then. However he vowed to train hard and put a maintain his professionalism.
He is owed 100K third party agreement which was written into the original deal. He was promised this would be paid this season. It was for 2013\. He was also on a heavily back ended deal where he was owed 70% of his contract money in 2014.
I would say with confidence that the 100K third party agreement has still not come to fruition.
I reckon he has every right to call the club out. He made a big effort to train hard, help the young blokes and drive a better culture off the field last year. He deserves his money whether you like him or not.
Our club is a shambles. No players will want to join when rubbish like this rolls on.
Correct me if I'm wrong, third party sponsorship is
Seperate from club a clubs playing contract.
Can be included as a seperate part in contracts, but can't be initiated by a club.
So it's not the wests tigers that owe that third party money. It's the third party sponsor?
Is this correct?
_Posted using RoarFEED_