Austin to fullback

@maxxy86 said:
Think if Potter is serious he has to include Austin somewhere in the 13 next round. My choice would be at fullback. Thoughts ??????

He's never played there before. No thanks.
 
@willow said:
@maxxy86 said:
Think if Potter is serious he has to include Austin somewhere in the 13 next round. My choice would be at fullback. Thoughts ??????

He's never played there before. No thanks.

First words that came to my mind reading your response Willow…Michael Morgan.

I am against the idea though
 
@Milky said:
@willow said:
@maxxy86 said:
Think if Potter is serious he has to include Austin somewhere in the 13 next round. My choice would be at fullback. Thoughts ??????

He's never played there before. No thanks.

First words that came to my mind reading your response Willow…Michael Morgan.

I am against the idea though

He spent the offseason training at 6, and now with Anasta out for 3 weeks, Blake will get his chance against the Roosters. This will give us more spark in the halves and hopefully our backs will see more ball. It will no doubt result in Rowe being kept at fullback, but injuries are forcing our hand now.
 
I don't see Rowe as a liability, just not as good as our best. Its only fair that if you are going to throw a kid in the team out of desperation, then atleast give him a good chance to prove himself.

I would leave him there until our best are ready.
 
@thesquid said:
I don't see Rowe as a liability, just not as good as our best. Its only fair that if you are going to throw a kid in the team out of desperation, then atleast give him a good chance to prove himself.

I would leave him there until our best are ready.

Exactly.
He's not making exciting kick returns or scoring meat pies, but how many games has he played in the NRL, if anyone remembers the Morris boys early games, they would have put them in park footy.
You can't expect a kid with zero first grade experience to tear the roof off, it rarely happens and he hasn't cost us games.

_Posted using RoarFEED V.4_
 
@DonnyBrasco said:
@thesquid said:
I don't see Rowe as a liability, just not as good as our best. Its only fair that if you are going to throw a kid in the team out of desperation, then atleast give him a good chance to prove himself.

I would leave him there until our best are ready.

Exactly.
He's not making exciting kick returns or scoring meat pies, but how many games has he played in the NRL, if anyone remembers the Morris boys early games, they would have put them in park footy.
You can't expect a kid with zero first grade experience to tear the roof off, it rarely happens and he hasn't cost us games.

_Posted using RoarFEED V.4_

Uhh yes it has, if Sandow didn't have a day off with his boot his defence would of cost us the game.
 
Back
Top