Balmain hijack Wests Tigers Gala Ball night

Well said tiger4ever some like to fault everytime for no reason but they will be the first to chant TIGERS! TIGERS! on game day, or alternatively go watch NSW Cup and chant MAGGIES all you like
 
@tigers05 said:
Well said tiger4ever some like to fault everytime for no reason but they will be the first to chant TIGERS! TIGERS! on game day, or alternatively go watch NSW Cup and chant MAGGIES all you like

nothing wrong with that afterall they are called the tigers.I alwayz call them the tigers and never Wests,but to be corrected when you do call them just Wests is pretty disrespectful
 
@GNR4LIFE said:
@tiger4ever said:
Find out why its not equal who only a few think its not …and stop [automatically edited] about it…you feel that strong go to the the meetings and have your say its no use on here.Id say magpies make their own bed.

What not equal what would make you guys happy and not just say oh its not 50- 50 bla bla

Gees you have 2 parts of your name associated with the jersey....you have wests you have the magpie where we just got the nickname tigers ....no balmain or anything. i thought choosing to keep our nickname was a smart move cause like it or not most clubs are called by that...roosters.raiders,broncos,dragons etc

It is our spiritual home ground in a way it been played on by us for close to 70 seasons so that why the MEDIA say it.

you accuse all ex -Magpies of 'whinging' about everything so it only makes me assume that you think this is an equal JV with both clubs being as important as each other,meaning we as ex-Magpie fans are 'whinging' for no reason.Is that the way you see it?

Thanks tiger05

gnr4life yes that what i think….you got it.... and not all magpie fans just you guys that i know of.

I certainly dont have a problem with what ever you call them...call em maggies for all i care and im sure most wouldnt but you guys are saying what the media recognise them as arent you....
 
This is a good thread with great healthy debate. Hope Willow does not close it down :laughing:

Its all about genuine equity, fairness and public Perception.

What we are trying to say is that Balmain have favourable status in the JV. This is reflected by no gripes from the Balmain side of the JV. It all goes there way, now this may be of credit to them, but, it all goes there way.

They have no shame.
 
@Balmain Bug said:
This is a good thread with great healthy debate. Hope Willow does not close it down :laughing:

Its all about genuine equity, fairness and public Perception.

What we are trying to say is that Balmain have favourable status in the JV. This is reflected by no gripes from the Balmain side of the JV. It all goes there way, now this may be of credit to them, but, it all goes there way.

They have no shame.

What no white V…THE MEDIA calling them tigers ....all the internal stuff that none of us would no any facts about is pointless bringing up
 
@Balmain Bug said:
This is a good thread with great healthy debate. Hope Willow does not close it down :laughing:

Its all about genuine equity, fairness and public Perception.

What we are trying to say is that Balmain have favourable status in the JV. This is reflected by no gripes from the Balmain side of the JV. It all goes there way, now this may be of credit to them, but, it all goes there way.

They have no shame.

So because they choose to do things that fit in with the Wests Tigers for the greater good of their own club, that automatically gives you the right to bag them at every opportunity simply because Wests choose a different path? I wonder if anyone threatened Balmain that their would be consequences if they held their gala night elsewhere…I think not

It's unbelievably petty pointing the stick at Balmain when you should be pointing it at Wests if you feel they are being hard done by simply because they do things a different way. Ignorance is bliss for some on here.
 
Given it is half time in the origin, why don't someone draft an email and find out why western suburbs are not involved in the wests tigers gala?
 
@Balmain Bug said:
Willow,
Who says they do things to fit in with Wests Tigers ?

I don't know Bug, isn't that what you are suggesting in your original post? It obviously put your nose out of joint once again because you have some sort of grievance in how they do things. If how they choose to run things doesn't sit well with you, then take it up with them. Funny how it's only an issue with one or two people on here.

If you feel Wests are being hard done by then maybe you should take it up with their management as well and ask the question as to why they don't try and run functions in conjunction with the Wests Tigers. There's obviously a reason behind every decision.
 
There's some serious hypocrisy here. You want Wests to have their autonomy and stand alone, but you'll readily complain when Balmain get involved with the JV and Wests aren't invited to the party?

Do you want Wests to stand as their own identity or do you want to them to become more proactive in the JV? Which is it? You can't have both!
\
\
Posted using RoarFEED
 
CB,
I dont know what you mean about me wanting Wests Maggies to stand alone. I have never said that. Wests Tigers only thanks.

Dont twist things.

Im saying its not right for Balmain to do there Hall of Fame thingo at a Wests Tigers function and its not right for Wests Tigers to allow it to occur. It all comes down to perception and I perceive it as yet another bit of favouritism shown towards Balmain.

Thats just how I perceive it.

Please dont make personal attacks against me. I dont make personal attacks against you. Willow at times is on a massive power trip abd closes threads when they dont go the way he wants but you CB, c'mon man.
 
@Balmain Bug said:
I dont know what you mean about me wanting Wests Maggies to stand alone. I have never said that. Wests Tigers only thanks.

Good to hear. BB in my opinion has always supported Wests Tigers.

I still think you've got this wrong Bug but truthfully I don't have enough info to really judge the situation.
 
@Balmain Bug said:
CB,
I dont know what you mean about me wanting Wests Maggies to stand alone. I have never said that. Wests Tigers only thanks.

Dont twist things.

Im saying its not right for Balmain to do there Hall of Fame thingo at a Wests Tigers function and its not right for Wests Tigers to allow it to occur. It all comes down to perception and I perceive it as yet another bit of favouritism shown towards Balmain.

Thats just how I perceive it.

Please dont make personal attacks against me. I dont make personal attacks against you. Willow at times is on a massive power trip abd closes threads when they dont go the way he wants but you CB, c'mon man.

This may be how you perceive things bug - but your perception is extremely warped!!!

Does it belie some sort of inferiority complex that requires compensation by bringing down others to your level?

You continue to ignore that it is an annual Balmain Tigers function that has not been hijacked by anybody - instead it has been re-branded by the JV (as will be the case with the Magpies equivalent annual event as of this year)!!!!!!!!

Equity is not at stake - while both sides of the JV are equally subordinating their original identities in favour of the Wests Tigers brand (which the majority incl. yourself the majority of the time - agree represents both the present & future for our clubs)!!

As far as being divisive (not "devisive") - it is impossible to deny a trusim bug!!! The fact is you use this forum to push your own unsupported agendas to others who may either dislike Sheens or feel otherwise disenfranchised!!

This is an appalling thread that has wasted the time of too many committed supporters at a time when our season is starting to blossom!!

Stop making yourself into a repetitious two-line joke - you are better than that!!!!
 
again, focus your rage at the relative failings of the Wests administration.
At the end of the day the buck stops with them, not Wests Tigers
 
Bug,

PS - in answer to your question regarding how the JV is not to the benefit of Balmain - all I can say is from a Balmain member/supporter's view - it would have to be dealing with tiresome Magpies fans of your ilk!!

However - I should also state that one of the great benefits has been sharing all the good times with the other 99% of Magpies supporters!
 
@Balmain Bug said:
Can someone answer my question ?

As I understand it your question was, "Can you name one thing that the Balmain side of the joint venture are disadvantaged on in regards to what they get from the JV? I bet you cant."

Here are three things that disadvantage the Balmain side:
1\. Loss of the name "Balmain" from the NRL team name.
2\. Loss of home games away from Leichhardt Oval
3\. Dilution of the strong Balmain colours of black and gold with insipid white in the jersey and club merchandise.

However, I hasten to add that given that it is a joint venture, these are things which I, like all the other former Balmain supporters I know, are prepared to deal with in the greater interests of both sides of the joint venture.
:sign:

So far, I've read nothing that proves there's been a hijacking. It all seems completely consensual.
If as your thread suggests the Wests Tigers Gala Ball Night has been hijacked by Balmain why do we not hear a complaint from either the Wests Tigers or the Western Suburbs Magpies officialdom?
:dead
 
@willow said:
@Balmain Bug said:
Willow,
Who says they do things to fit in with Wests Tigers ?

I don't know Bug, isn't that what you are suggesting in your original post? It obviously put your nose out of joint once again because you have some sort of grievance in how they do things. If how they choose to run things doesn't sit well with you, then take it up with them. Funny how it's only an issue with one or two people on here.

If you feel Wests are being hard done by then maybe you should take it up with their management as well and ask the question as to why they don't try and run functions in conjunction with the Wests Tigers. There's obviously a reason behind every decision.

Its only an issue with one or two people hey.You need to get out more willow.
 
@magpie mania said:
@willow said:
@Balmain Bug said:
Willow,
Who says they do things to fit in with Wests Tigers ?

I don't know Bug, isn't that what you are suggesting in your original post? It obviously put your nose out of joint once again because you have some sort of grievance in how they do things. If how they choose to run things doesn't sit well with you, then take it up with them. Funny how it's only an issue with one or two people on here.

If you feel Wests are being hard done by then maybe you should take it up with their management as well and ask the question as to why they don't try and run functions in conjunction with the Wests Tigers. There's obviously a reason behind every decision.

Its only an issue with one or two people hey.You need to get out more willow.

Maybe you also need to broaden your horizons mm - and realise that some cranky men at Leumeah is hardly representative of our expansive fan base!!
 
You use the words Leumeah and non-representative of our expanding fan base when you consider the macarthur region is the fastest growing in the entire country shows the silliness of your post.Continue to live your life with orange sunglasses on and take pot shots at leumeah but I will embrace this area as it is the exact area where we will see most of our expanding fan base come from.I HOWEVER am smart enough to see that this area is critical in the success of the WESTS TIGERS.
 
Back
Top