Blair for 5

Well In that case I'll say it. Manly's plea for a 24 hr delay worked in there favour. They will have there man if the make it to the finals!
\
\
Posted using RoarFEED
 
He got exactly the same penalty as Blair for the reported (2nd fight) incident. Blair got the extra two weeks for the 1st knuckle.

Therefore there was no bias or leniency offered to Manly. The judiciary were consistent - consistently wrong that is.
 
Except he threw the first punch so should of hot more then Blair!!
\
\
Posted using RoarFEED
 
@tigerbenji said:
Sorry Manly Tiger i didnt mean to upset you but the way lussick carried on was a joke & what was said didnt sound real great & i realise he is only young & i must admit he has a lot of potential but if he isted involved in something like this again i hope he thinks before he puts his mouth into gear.

No sweat,not upset. Just trying to point out that what was reported was not how the actually interview went. I agree it sounds bad, but during the interview the brawl wasn't mentioned by either the reporter or LUSSICK. It was all about the game . But the reporter has made it sound like he was talking about the brawl. Only do his job though, thats how they sell papers.
 

Latest posts

Members online

Back
Top