OFFICIAL Blake Ayshford [Discussion]

  • Thread starter Thread starter Guest
  • Start date Start date
@willow said:
Idris won it.

He was good before his injury but was way too slow when he came back.

Mortimer didn't play enough games to win it.

Ayshford must have been close.
 
idris is goot running onto a ball 5m from the try line. anywhere else he is nothing.
he scored a good try in round 1 and one other good one during the year. apart from that he is nothing.
josh dugan should have got the award. i watch plenty of canberra games coz my brother-in-law is a mad raiders supporter and dugan and croker are outstanding.
idris winning is a joke.
any teams playing dogs would want a blue-print of sheens's gameplan coz he picked out every single weakeness in idris n the tigers ripped him all night long. benji ran past him as though he didnt exist when he scored.
 
i don't understand how this works. do players or fans vote idris in?

also how can farah finish 4th on the dally m points, well ahead of ennis, but ennis wins hooker of the year???
 
Watch Mad Dog school Idris this week if they line up on the same side of the field. If they don't, then Mullen will run rings around him like Marshall did.
 
@Torbizlo said:
idris is goot running onto a ball 5m from the try line. anywhere else he is nothing.
he scored a good try in round 1 and one other good one during the year. apart from that he is nothing.
josh dugan should have got the award. i watch plenty of canberra games coz my brother-in-law is a mad raiders supporter and dugan and croker are outstanding.
idris winning is a joke.
any teams playing dogs would want a blue-print of sheens's gameplan coz he picked out every single weakeness in idris n the tigers ripped him all night long. benji ran past him as though he didnt exist when he scored.

I can only think that its because the Dogs get more exposure then the Raiders.

And lets face it, Idris stands out a lot more then some skinny guys with headgear.

If ch 9 chowed some Canberra games then the media would latch onto those guys more.

Dugan and Crocker are way better then Idris but sadly, just like it is with us a lot of the time, they dont get any recognition.

I truly believe the Dally M's are just a popularity contest. I mean it is decided by the media.
 
@Jazza said:
@Torbizlo said:
idris is goot running onto a ball 5m from the try line. anywhere else he is nothing.
he scored a good try in round 1 and one other good one during the year. apart from that he is nothing.
josh dugan should have got the award. i watch plenty of canberra games coz my brother-in-law is a mad raiders supporter and dugan and croker are outstanding.
idris winning is a joke.
any teams playing dogs would want a blue-print of sheens's gameplan coz he picked out every single weakeness in idris n the tigers ripped him all night long. benji ran past him as though he didnt exist when he scored.

I can only think that its because the Dogs get more exposure then the Raiders.

And lets face it, Idris stands out a lot more then some skinny guys with headgear.

If ch 9 chowed some Canberra games then the media would latch onto those guys more.

Dugan and Crocker are way better then Idris but sadly, just like it is with us a lot of the time, they dont get any recognition.

I truly believe the Dally M's are just a popularity contest. I mean it is decided by the media.

The award always goes to the first rookie to give the media orgasms. In 2007 Israel Folau had it won after 1 game. If Jordan Atkins didn't fall off the face of the earth last year he would've won it with ease.
 
what we need to do with ayshford in the off season is juice him up so he is nice n huge and teach him how to set up his winger and leave him in the centers. the more we stuff around with the team line-up the more we will keep repeating our self in sept 2010 when we just miss out again because of continuous chopping and changing to the team. iv had enough of experimenting. if we have not found a proper combination by now then we never will.
 
Ayshford's too valuable @ centre. i luv him there.
I reckon, if any centre's gonna play at lock it will be tame tupou, he's more built than ayshford.
 
I hope we keep Ayshford in the centres. He was only moved to the wing because our wingers were injured.
 
Ayshford will do just fine..

He hasnt stopped growing and started to really fill out yet, He is still comparritivly very young as is almost the entire team.

Where was that team list that contained the ages….
 
At this stage, i don't think lock is his best position, nor is he needed there. Centre is a much better fit for the team. Which is what everyone should be thinking about. Not what is in the best interest of the individual. Sure he has natural strength and will fill out nicely, but in the modern game that is just as handy out wide, especially with ayshfords deceptive speed and slight of hand. Ayshford and Lawrence will prove to be the best centre pairing in the comp.
 
I cannot understand the talk about moving Ayshford to lock. Haven't we got enough back-rowers in the club to cover this positiuon next year and well into the future?
Ayshford and Lawrence will prove to be the best centre pairing in the NRL from next year forward!
 
@MightyMaggy said:
I cannot understand the talk about moving Ayshford to lock. Haven't we got enough back-rowers in the club to cover this positiuon next year and well into the future?
Ayshford and Lawrence will prove to be the best centre pairing in the NRL from next year forward!

I couldnt agree more. Why do we want every tall strong back to become a lock when tall strong centres have become the norm.

Should Folou be a lock? Hodges? Inglis? No!!! Let me dominate in the centres…...and leave Ayshford there to smash them into touch.
 
Ayshford found the ability to beat a man towards the end of the year.I'd definitely be keeping him in the 3\. jersey.If we do get Lote we would have possibly the biggest back-line in the comp.
 
Its all about getting the best balance. Their are so many options for the backline, so maybe to squeeze everyone into the backline they may give him a go at lock. The possibilities are endless Moltzen to centre, tamarta (excuse the spelling) to 7 and maybe Lotte,Ryan,Lazarus or Mallaney to no1 and Blake to the back of the scrum. I dont think it will happen, but for once we have plenty of options and especially in key postions
 
Where ever hey plays i think the tigers are lucky to have him!!!

We should also thank the roosters who after signing O Meley and Mason had to get rid of a stack of juniors, Ayshford being one of them!!! I just hope that we don't have to do the same if we snare lote and lima!!
 
no way to lock yet hes only just started first grade and has played in the centres. hes way too small. maybe 2011 after he's had a decent period to actually bulk up.

on that note, lawrence at lock could be a good idea.
 
@mtd said:
no way to lock yet hes only just started first grade and has played in the centres. hes way too small. maybe 2011 after he's had a decent period to actually bulk up.

on that note, lawrence at lock could be a good idea.

Lawrence will turn out to be a very good centre and it may be next year. Why would you even contemplate taking him away from there?

Lawrence and Ayshford will develop into a very good centre combination and maybe next year they will show it. Why would you even contemplate splitting this pair?
 
Back
Top