Bring back the Demps

Status
Not open for further replies.
@aubanon said in [Bring back the Demps](/post/1377203) said:
@willow said in [Bring back the Demps](/post/1377071) said:
If @Kul has any commonsense he'll make the ban permanent. Demps has had more than enough chances on this forum and is unable to conform and post appropriately. Last night typified that.

That's disappointing to hear Willow.

This place and control of the domain shouldn't belong to any single person.

I agree. But probably wouldn’t if we were in North Korea. Great site, but lets not give up what the Anzacs fought for. Freedom and Freedom of Speech. Mods generally doing great and for a long time. Credit given for where its due. But please lets not make this Fan Forum a nanny forum. And yes there are limits and lines that shouldn’t crossed.
 
@isaaktigers said in [Bring back the Demps](/post/1377540) said:
Something the form needed... has been puss lately with useless posts about posting pictures of themselves, bagging people, people getting angry over posts / down votes.

Really I want to talk about footy, not where everyone lives, what you’re eating.

P.S - I hate the Hynes chat and love how the Brooks haters have gone into hiding!

I was enjoying your post and agreeing with the talking about footy part but then inexplicably you devolved into the the same baiting that you were saying you dont enjoy , or maybe I am just reading it wrong .... but ,,,,,, I often get very critical of Brooks after a game and vocal on here but I LOVE it when he proves me wrong ... as a die hard tigers fan nothing makes me happier then when he played like he did on Friday night, I would be stoked, overjoyed , and mightily impressed were he to repeat this and go on to become the player we hoped he would have . He is mighty likeable , he’s a loyal tiger supporter apparently and nothing would make me happier then for him to become a clutch player and match winner for the mighty tigers ...I just hope it is possible as he is 155 games in and it would be a statistically unusual a abberation for a player to take that long to hit his straps and become a gun marquee match winner , but it’s not impossible and it would be fantastic for him to be the outlier !!!
 
@willow said in [Bring back the Demps](/post/1377312) said:
@aj1 said in [Bring back the Demps](/post/1377279) said:
@geo said in [Bring back the Demps](/post/1377270) said:
@aj1 said in [Bring back the Demps](/post/1377264) said:
@willow said in [Bring back the Demps](/post/1377173) said:
@mikey said in [Bring back the Demps](/post/1377142) said:
@cochise said in [Bring back the Demps](/post/1377137) said:
@mikey said in [Bring back the Demps](/post/1377131) said:
While we are on this topic of appropriacy for the forum I have noticed a lot more posts with either disguised swearing or actual mild swearing not being deleted in the last three weeks or so.

I had a post with disguised deleted about a month ago - it deserved it if the rule is absolutely no swearing but now I'm a little confused. Is some disguised swearing acceptable? Is mild swearing acceptable?
Could we have clarification around that?

=

I can only really speak for myself but will no longer be deleting disguised swearing. It still breaches forum guidelines so if you do post in that manner you still run the risk of it being deleted.

I understand you don't have a problem with it 🙂

I do get it when people are venting frustration and sometimes go too far (done it myself) but given the site does try to accommodate all ages, genders etc am glad there are standards.

Kul - what are your thoughts on it these days? Happy with whatever you decide but just seeking clarity so I can stay within the guidelines.

@Kul Good luck getting a response out of him. He won't engage with the moderators on here.

Engage with mods whatsoever or specifically on this thread? Given the number of years and thousands of hours moderating posts I certainly hope you're not talking about the former.

Former..

Wow

Exactly. The lack of engagement and respect is beyond disappointing.

Has he been watching too many Supernatural re-runs and thinking he's like God and you guys are the Winchesters? 🙂
 
@isaaktigers said in [Bring back the Demps](/post/1377540) said:
Something the form needed... has been puss lately with useless posts about posting pictures of themselves, bagging people, people getting angry over posts / down votes.

Really I want to talk about footy, not where everyone lives, what you’re eating.

P.S - I hate the Hynes chat and love how the Brooks haters have gone into hiding!

Brooks haters aren't hiding. We just don't want a 3 week holiday for being critical of him.
Say he is hopeless and you'll get a forum holiday.
 
@matchball said in [Bring back the Demps](/post/1377602) said:
@isaaktigers said in [Bring back the Demps](/post/1377540) said:
Something the form needed... has been puss lately with useless posts about posting pictures of themselves, bagging people, people getting angry over posts / down votes.

Really I want to talk about footy, not where everyone lives, what you’re eating.

P.S - I hate the Hynes chat and love how the Brooks haters have gone into hiding!

Brooks haters aren't hiding. We just don't want a 3 week holiday for being critical of him.
Say he is hopeless and you'll get a forum holiday.

What a load of crap.
 
@tigerwest said in [Bring back the Demps](/post/1377604) said:
@matchball said in [Bring back the Demps](/post/1377602) said:
@isaaktigers said in [Bring back the Demps](/post/1377540) said:
Something the form needed... has been puss lately with useless posts about posting pictures of themselves, bagging people, people getting angry over posts / down votes.

Really I want to talk about footy, not where everyone lives, what you’re eating.

P.S - I hate the Hynes chat and love how the Brooks haters have gone into hiding!

Brooks haters aren't hiding. We just don't want a 3 week holiday for being critical of him.
Say he is hopeless and you'll get a forum holiday.

What a load of crap.

It's true. I was given a no reason ban for one post saying Luke Brooks is hopeless.
I message admin and silence.
 
@matchball said in [Bring back the Demps](/post/1377605) said:
@tigerwest said in [Bring back the Demps](/post/1377604) said:
@matchball said in [Bring back the Demps](/post/1377602) said:
@isaaktigers said in [Bring back the Demps](/post/1377540) said:
Something the form needed... has been puss lately with useless posts about posting pictures of themselves, bagging people, people getting angry over posts / down votes.

Really I want to talk about footy, not where everyone lives, what you’re eating.

P.S - I hate the Hynes chat and love how the Brooks haters have gone into hiding!

Brooks haters aren't hiding. We just don't want a 3 week holiday for being critical of him.
Say he is hopeless and you'll get a forum holiday.

What a load of crap.

It's true. I was given a no reason ban for one post saying Luke Brooks is hopeless.
I message admin and silence.

Well, you have just stated it again, so it could be your last post for a while?

Seriously mate, there have been many who haven't been happy with Brooks early form, I was one of them, but he has changed his game up noticeably imo, not sure what has happened for that, but it seems to have changed since Mbye moved to 6? Don't know if that is just coincidence or not?

Just think we need to be fair on players assessments.
 
@geo said in [Bring back the Demps](/post/1377617) said:
Behahahaha even in Demps thread .Brooks gets a mention...

Yep.
We had people complaining that Demps hijacks threads and starts irrelevant threads.
Yet here we are talking about Brooks while meanwhile another current thread focuses on the cars we drive.
The thread's just become an opportunity for Demps haters to take cheap shots.
 
@thedaboss said in [Bring back the Demps](/post/1377593) said:
@tigerbenji said in [Bring back the Demps](/post/1377590) said:
Was going to ask how long is Demps in the Sin Bin for?.

Sent off, Perma

Does "Perma" mean permanent? Haven't seen that abbreviation before.
 
@dwight-schrute said in [Bring back the Demps](/post/1377621) said:
@geo said in [Bring back the Demps](/post/1377617) said:
Behahahaha even in Demps thread .Brooks gets a mention...

Yep.
We had people complaining that Demps hijacks threads and starts irrelevant threads.
Yet here we are talking about Brooks while meanwhile another current thread focuses on the cars we drive.
The thread's just become an opportunity for Demps haters to take cheap shots.

What is wrong with the car thread?
 
@cochise said in [Bring back the Demps](/post/1377635) said:
@dwight-schrute said in [Bring back the Demps](/post/1377621) said:
@geo said in [Bring back the Demps](/post/1377617) said:
Behahahaha even in Demps thread .Brooks gets a mention...

Yep.
We had people complaining that Demps hijacks threads and starts irrelevant threads.
Yet here we are talking about Brooks while meanwhile another current thread focuses on the cars we drive.
The thread's just become an opportunity for Demps haters to take cheap shots.

What is wrong with the car thread?

Nothing at all.
I'm just pointing out the contradiction.
I like diverse threads.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Back
Top