@Chainlink said in [Brooks\.\.\.\. what is he good for??](/post/1176950) said:
The only Problem we have with Brooks is they have slapping the wrong number on his back since he was 16. He is a very good running half with a decent kicking game.
We need a confident organising half next to him. A leader who knows how to manage a game.
Pitty the club tried to mould both Brooks and Moses into something they weren’t. I often wonder had Moses been given the reigns as the confident organising half and Brooks been given the role of second fiddle running 5/8, whether our club would have followed a different trajectory.
The only reason Moses is winning football games is because they signed Fergo and put Sivo on the wing . Add to that the sudden re-emergence of Jennings and yeah . When they didn’t have any go forward after their winger left they came last . This is not a coincidence. Their pack has slowly been developing , as well.
Also .... we are starting to win football games !
And we had 3 of our starting pack not playing , 2 guys were injured , and Joey had a brain explosion .
We are getting there . And Brooks is a huge component of that . Defensively elite , elite running game , above average short game , and an average kicking game.
The only real constructive criticism I’ve seen on here is that he needs to play more ad-lib footy , and less structure .
Otherwise it’s just outdated thoughts about what a half is , or just blaming every thing on him.
@Tiger5150 said in [Brooks\.\.\.\. what is he good for??](/post/1177638) said:
@Strongee said in [Brooks\.\.\.\. what is he good for??](/post/1177633) said:
Is this still going ? When we win on Friday , all you haters will be silent or doubling down on your outrageous take. I tell you one thing , if Doueihi doesn’t hog the ball when he made the break , brooks runs away to score , because he’s actually good and you guys are morons .
He would score because we are morons?
Has that been the problem all this time?
No youre morons for having a 15 page debate , about the validity of an above average half in the NRL . Talking about signing players like Sezer , dropping him for a Player who’s 35 and is best served coming off the bench , who also can’t tackle anymore.
Like I’ve said before , anyone who says we should drop Brooks has zero idea about footy .... period .
And there’s infinite stats to back me up as well as the eyeball.