Brooks

Status
Not open for further replies.
@ said:
@ said:
@ said:
@ said:
Stop posting here you make far too much sense for most of the people on here.

You can say whatever you think about Marshall … he has proved himself and previously been named the best player in the world.
Brooks?
Not so much.

it wasn’t about that is was about how well Brooks was playing when our forwards were dominating the opposition, some people on here were even saying why sign NC the way Luke was playing.
Now that our forwards are being dominated he looks average, just like NC yesterday when his forwards got smashed.

You seriously think he was anywhere in the top 10 halves even then?

Go back and read the posts from the early rounds.
Don’t try and put words in my mouth I never said that he was in the top 10 half backs.
 
@ said:
@ said:
@ said:
@ said:
Were the forwards the ones dropping all the ball?

I don’t know to be honest, didn’t see much of them or I should say they didn’t see much of the ball.

Then again you are also right about the dropped balls… just upset with the whole team. Did not get the simple stuff right!

Well let’s look forward to 2019! Will be a better year!

Yeah mate just rewatched it was the backs and halves pushing passes.

Forwards can always improve and cleary rotation questionable but it was the backs and halves getting exited in attack that cost us big time. Not good enough l.

It can't be Brooks fault, it is never Brooks fault, he has only had 100 games he is still learning :deadhorse:

Yeah always somelses fault
 
@ said:
@ said:
OK..

Can he take our pack of powderpuff bar Rowdy with him..?

I am so over your backing of him, he has been a major flop, every time we need him to take control as he wanted, he has failed, 100 odd games and he still has no idea. :deadhorse:

Want a tissue..?
 
@ said:
@ said:
@ said:
@ said:
You can say whatever you think about Marshall … he has proved himself and previously been named the best player in the world.
Brooks?
Not so much.

it wasn’t about that is was about how well Brooks was playing when our forwards were dominating the opposition, some people on here were even saying why sign NC the way Luke was playing.
Now that our forwards are being dominated he looks average, just like NC yesterday when his forwards got smashed.

You seriously think he was anywhere in the top 10 halves even then?

Go back and read the posts from the early rounds.
Don’t try and put words in my mouth I never said that he was in the top 10 half backs.

Seriously?
Yes , I’ll spend an hour or two trawling you previous posts.
Too hard to answer a simple question?
 
@ said:
@ said:
@ said:
With benji back is it time to send him to reserves to have a think about what the hell he is doing.

Have a think how well he played whilst our forwards controlled things.
Same with Benji … his game fell away when there was no room to think.
Find it hard to understand that some people don’t understand how this game operates.
It’s same with Cronk at Roosters .... Storm forward pack not around him and his form is down.

Stop posting here you make far too much sense for most of the people on here.

Really

Watch the game again. There was plenty attacking opportunities.

You will find it was the backs and halves dropped ball that lost the game.

Stop making excuses for him. Until he wins us consistant footy he will always be average.
 
@ said:
@ said:
@ said:
@ said:
it wasn’t about that is was about how well Brooks was playing when our forwards were dominating the opposition, some people on here were even saying why sign NC the way Luke was playing.
Now that our forwards are being dominated he looks average, just like NC yesterday when his forwards got smashed.

You seriously think he was anywhere in the top 10 halves even then?

Go back and read the posts from the early rounds.
Don’t try and put words in my mouth I never said that he was in the top 10 half backs.

Seriously?
Yes , I’ll spend an hour or two trawling you previous posts.
Too hard to answer a simple question?

Brooks is like the opposite of Blake Green.

A break out over night sensation that cannot perform without a calm organiser outside to guide him.

Hed probably be great outside Maloney or Cronk but on his own or with a runner like Grub he's rendered useless.

7\. Brooks
6\. Gamble

Would be a nightmare and couldn't even compete in a 20s comp.
 
@ said:
The forwards and backs were as bad as each other. Those poor errors were costly. Forwards tackling was varying between 30-50 (Taylor 50 think Lawrence even did 30 tackles). Yet backs were once again the only ones making ground.
Agree with rotation. Been saying it since Panthers game, Ivan takes our only metre eater off and plays them an average of 37mins. See Twal now, which was Matulino until Panthers game.
Believe our tackle count was north of 520 and Titans was 140-190 less (from different sources).
There's no doubt we need another big body but our backs need to get the basics right too.

As for Brooks I'm more disappointed he wasnt kicking to give his forwards a rest.

Exactly corey thompson basically cost us the game.
 
All I can see is someone needs to count to six. Brooks Reynolds, water boy whatever….. it’s not that hard speak I like a kiwi and you will always know when the end game is up
 
Not going to win any games of football if you have as many errors as we did in the second half. Worse then the Canberra game. Back to basics boys, learn the simple things like holding the ball, not dropping it. Arghhhhhhhh
 
@ said:
@ said:
18 errors, 8 penalties and brooks is the problem :roll

His kicking and running game sucked that hard Farah had to take over .

RF had good game certainly played his part. Brooks put a couple of decent kicks in.

Wasn't his best game agree but didn't have many chances.

I just don't get why he is being singled out. Our wingers had 9 errors, our starting pack made 200mtrs collectively.
 
@ said:
@ said:
@ said:
18 errors, 8 penalties and brooks is the problem :roll

His kicking and running game sucked that hard Farah had to take over .

RF had good game certainly played his part. Brooks put a couple of decent kicks in.

Wasn't his best game agree but didn't have many chances.

I just don't get why he is being singled out. Our wingers had 9 errors, our starting pack made 200mtrs collectively.

Gronks on foxtel like Blocker reckon Brooks under performed because Farah is back and stifled his game.
 
@ said:
@ said:
@ said:
18 errors, 8 penalties and brooks is the problem :roll

His kicking and running game sucked that hard Farah had to take over .

RF had good game certainly played his part. Brooks put a couple of decent kicks in.

Wasn't his best game agree but didn't have many chances.

I just don't get why he is being singled out. Our wingers had 9 errors, our starting pack made 200mtrs collectively.

Useually a gun halfback can create something from nothing .
In over 100 games brooks hasn’t once taken a game by the scruff of the neck and got us home.

Yeah …our plodder pack is disgusting
 
@ said:
@ said:
@ said:
@ said:
18 errors, 8 penalties and brooks is the problem :roll

His kicking and running game sucked that hard Farah had to take over .

RF had good game certainly played his part. Brooks put a couple of decent kicks in.

Wasn't his best game agree but didn't have many chances.

I just don't get why he is being singled out. Our wingers had 9 errors, our starting pack made 200mtrs collectively.

Gronks on foxtel like Blocker reckon Brooks under performed because Farah is back and stifled his game.

Blocker, was great with a football under his arm or a ref under his palm.

Not so good when it comes to the finer details of football.
 
@ said:
@ said:
@ said:
@ said:
18 errors, 8 penalties and brooks is the problem :roll

His kicking and running game sucked that hard Farah had to take over .

RF had good game certainly played his part. Brooks put a couple of decent kicks in.

Wasn't his best game agree but didn't have many chances.

I just don't get why he is being singled out. Our wingers had 9 errors, our starting pack made 200mtrs collectively.

Gronks on foxtel like Blocker reckon Brooks under performed because Farah is back and stifled his game.

Definite Gronks, I'm not a Robbie fan at the moment, but he was one of our best today (with Chrissy, and MBye wasn't bad either). Our big bad forwards are just not big or bad. And our backs suck.

Hate to be Cleary right now,

Of our current first 17, if I had the choice I wouldn't keep a lot.

Need a quality centre to partner Marsters, a quality winger better than Thompson on the other wing, a starting prop who can make some metres. A second rower with a lot of mongrel, and some impact from the bench.

MWZ, Sue, thanks and good bye. Better off picking TBC and going in a man or two down.
 
@ said:
@ said:
@ said:
@ said:
His kicking and running game sucked that hard Farah had to take over .

RF had good game certainly played his part. Brooks put a couple of decent kicks in.

Wasn't his best game agree but didn't have many chances.

I just don't get why he is being singled out. Our wingers had 9 errors, our starting pack made 200mtrs collectively.

Gronks on foxtel like Blocker reckon Brooks under performed because Farah is back and stifled his game.

Blocker, was great with a football under his arm or a ref under his palm.

Not so good when it comes to the finer details of football.

Some forum hero called for him to be the man to motivate the boys? ? He's a puppet, literally.
 
@ said:
@ said:
@ said:
@ said:
18 errors, 8 penalties and brooks is the problem :roll

His kicking and running game sucked that hard Farah had to take over .

RF had good game certainly played his part. Brooks put a couple of decent kicks in.

Wasn't his best game agree but didn't have many chances.

I just don't get why he is being singled out. Our wingers had 9 errors, our starting pack made 200mtrs collectively.

Useually a gun halfback can create something from nothing .
In over 100 games brooks hasn’t once taken a game by the scruff of the neck and got us home.

Yeah …our plodder pack is disgusting

brooks is not a gun halfback. He is a good one when the team is going forward but not one that is going to manufacture a win for us. On that I agree.

But name 3 half backs in the nrl that could have turned today's game around for us? I can't .
 
@ said:
@ said:
@ said:
@ said:
18 errors, 8 penalties and brooks is the problem :roll

His kicking and running game sucked that hard Farah had to take over .

RF had good game certainly played his part. Brooks put a couple of decent kicks in.

Wasn't his best game agree but didn't have many chances.

I just don't get why he is being singled out. Our wingers had 9 errors, our starting pack made 200mtrs collectively.

Useually a gun halfback can create something from nothing .
In over 100 games brooks hasn’t once taken a game by the scruff of the neck and got us home.

Yeah …our plodder pack is disgusting

I don't mean to be critical of Brooks but cut him some slack his still a young half back learning his trade :laughing: His stats will tell you so .
Give him another 100 games and he might take control of this team . :laughing: :laughing:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top