@wd in perth said:@Russell said:@Tigermama said:@wd in perth said:Probably the wealthiest support group in the league. But doesn't seem to do Balmain much good. Quite staggering really.
On another note, am I the only one thats uneasy about a sponsor who's associated with others within the game? I mean, supporters of 5 clubs? Where do loyalties lie?
WD It's a law firm, what do you expect :laughing: Their interest and loyalty lies in the mighty $$$$…
One of the few positive stories to come out of the Wests Tigers for years and you are negative about Brydon's wanting to help out.
They are not in it to make money, that is for sure.
What do you think they will get out of it Tigermama?
The only thing they will get out of it is publicity and they already get that from being the major sponsor. So they would get nothing further from being a 50% owner (maybe a little more say at board level) than they do now.
He is anticipating doing it because he is passionate about the club - I am sure if this 50% buy took place he would drop the other sponsorships at the first opportunity. Millions of dollars makes him seem pretty loyal to me but lets cast a dispersion over Brydon's loyalty. Don't know why they even bother.
Of course they're in it to make money. If not, they'd just donate a bucket load and not worry about the visible tags on the shirts. I think its great that theyre keen to be sponsors. I just don't get why one company wants to be a part of numerous teams in the same competition.
I guess WD that sponsoring lots of different teams, means more exposure for the law firm. Brings in more clients $$$ they normally wouldn't attract. It's good advertising, and obviously they can afford it.