BUNKER WRONG!!!!!

No separation, does not = control.
They need to stop making decisions solely based on freeze frames.
The ball bounced higher than the Burj Khalifa in Dubai.
 
Under their interpretations, it was a try and Ill give it.

Having said that, I don't believe it ever should be. Clear loss of control.
 
We didn't deserve to win but if the correct decision was made and it was 2-0 we could have gone for a goal on one of the numerous penalties and gotta a 2-2 draw. Having said that , that was an awful game of league.
So many penalties and drop ball. We couldn't hold the ball and all Para did was bomb on the fifth to Teddy. I should have gone into the Easter Show and watch the wood-chop or sheep dogs
 
@Swordy said:
Under their interpretations, it was a try and Ill give it.

Having said that, I don't believe it ever should be. Clear loss of control.

What interpretation are u going on? Its my understanding that its all about control. So if u go by "the interpretation" the decison was wrong, as he lost control.
 
@shane2801 said:
Whatever the score (it's 20 mins to go) I really believe the Bunker got it wrong with Parra's first try. I never complain about refs but this frame by frame review decision is absolute rubbish.

I have been saying for years that any video decision should only be allowed to be viewed in real time. There is no way that player had control of that ball, even when you watch it slowed down.

Control of the ball is not in the rule book. His hand never left the ball until after it was forced. Sure it was only a finger or two but that's all you need. Try everyday of the week. The Bunker got it right.
 
@king sirro said:
@Swordy said:
Under their interpretations, it was a try and Ill give it.

Having said that, I don't believe it ever should be. Clear loss of control.

What interpretation are u going on? Its my understanding that its all about control. So if u go by "the interpretation" the decison was wrong, as he lost control.

The interpretation is about control, ball never left his hand and so deemed to be in control until it does PROVIDED the scorer can exhibit a reasonable influence on the plane of the ball…..rotation, spin etc.

If it leaves his fingertips and the ball turns, moves etc due to inertia, and not direct influence by the scoring player, but then he gets fingers on it again before it hits the ground, that is not control unless the scoring player has exhibited control of the ball in this instance, not merely downward pressure.

Having said that, i think its BS either way King Sirro. My opinion is you cant control a ball with the last joint in your pinky, but that is not NRL opinion.
 
@Swordy said:
@king sirro said:
@Swordy said:
Under their interpretations, it was a try and Ill give it.

Having said that, I don't believe it ever should be. Clear loss of control.

What interpretation are u going on? Its my understanding that its all about control. So if u go by "the interpretation" the decison was wrong, as he lost control.

The interpretation is about control, ball never left his hand and so deemed to be in control until it does PROVIDED the scorer can exhibit a reasonable influence on the plane of the ball…..rotation, spin etc.

If it leaves his fingertips and the ball turns, moves etc due to inertia, and not direct influence by the scoring player, but then he gets fingers on it again before it hits the ground, that is not control unless the scoring player has exhibited control of the ball in this instance, not merely downward pressure.

Having said that, i think its BS either way King Sirro. My opinion is you cant control a ball with the last joint in your pinky, but that is not NRL opinion.

Sounds like common sense is out the wondow ay going by that explanation of control. Think we agree, but dont agree, if that makes sense lol
 
@innsaneink said:
So really we lost 2-0 to a hot team, yet everyone it seems is losing their____

Oh how many times u have a crack at someone on here for bracketing "everyone" together. Not everyone is losing it at all. A few yes, but dont brand all of us. Some obvious things to fix up and we are fine, but the fear is Taylor wont see these obvious things.
 
I did not see to much wrong with the call, but it is frustrating when they replay it 50 times trying to find a reason to over rule the on field official and grant a try and we do the same they replay it 50 times to try and take the try away from us.
 
SC thats my issue too. This weekend we saw some really brave decision making in the bunker where they refused to overturn the onfield decision because it wasnt clearly wrong. In my view thats the correct approach and if followed here should have been a no try. That being said, I cant quibble with this decision. I would have been ropeable if it had been the reverse and try disallowed.
 
@king sirro said:
@innsaneink said:
So really we lost 2-0 to a hot team, yet everyone it seems is losing their____

Oh how many times u have a crack at someone on here for bracketing "everyone" together. Not everyone is losing it at all. A few yes, but dont brand all of us. Some obvious things to fix up and we are fine, but the fear is Taylor wont see these obvious things.

I did say "it seems"….didnt want to generalise
 
@innsaneink said:
@king sirro said:
@innsaneink said:
So really we lost 2-0 to a hot team, yet everyone it seems is losing their____

Oh how many times u have a crack at someone on here for bracketing "everyone" together. Not everyone is losing it at all. A few yes, but dont brand all of us. Some obvious things to fix up and we are fine, but the fear is Taylor wont see these obvious things.

I did say "it seems"….didnt want to generalise

Lol, showing your experience there. Clearly been in a few debates on here.
 
@innsaneink said:
@king sirro said:
@innsaneink said:
So really we lost 2-0 to a hot team, yet everyone it seems is losing their____

Oh how many times u have a crack at someone on here for bracketing "everyone" together. Not everyone is losing it at all. A few yes, but dont brand all of us. Some obvious things to fix up and we are fine, but the fear is Taylor wont see these obvious things.

I did say "it seems"….didnt want to generalise

We'll lose again next week.
 
@Tigerdon said:
I was sitting right there behind the tryline and live everyone around me said no-try , including the Parra fans and the ref. Yet he sent it up to the Bunker. Live from 30 metres away , looked like he dropped the ball cold.
Final score should have benn 2-0 to Parra

I was surrounded by Parra fans some of whom looked and sounded like ex players and they unanimously called it a lost ball. They walked out in disbelief when was sent to he bunker. I thought maybe even the shadow of the fingers on the ball and not actual fingers
 
@Byron Bay Fan said:
@Tigerdon said:
I was sitting right there behind the tryline and live everyone around me said no-try , including the Parra fans and the ref. Yet he sent it up to the Bunker. Live from 30 metres away , looked like he dropped the ball cold.
Final score should have benn 2-0 to Parra

I was surrounded by Parra fans some of whom looked and sounded like ex players and they unanimously called it a lost ball. They walked out in disbelief when was sent to he bunker. I thought maybe even the shadow of the fingers on the ball and not actual fingers

Looked like former players. :roll
 
@gallagher said:
@Byron Bay Fan said:
@Tigerdon said:
I was sitting right there behind the tryline and live everyone around me said no-try , including the Parra fans and the ref. Yet he sent it up to the Bunker. Live from 30 metres away , looked like he dropped the ball cold.
Final score should have benn 2-0 to Parra

I was surrounded by Parra fans some of whom looked and sounded like ex players and they unanimously called it a lost ball. They walked out in disbelief when was sent to he bunker. I thought maybe even the shadow of the fingers on the ball and not actual fingers

Looked like former players. :roll

Yes as a group, big burly guys with excellent footie knowledge all wearing old Parra gear. The same mob who reckons that Robbie should be capt.
 
Back
Top