Under their interpretations, it was a try and Ill give it.
Having said that, I don't believe it ever should be. Clear loss of control.
What interpretation are u going on? Its my understanding that its all about control. So if u go by "the interpretation" the decison was wrong, as he lost control.
The interpretation is about control, ball never left his hand and so deemed to be in control until it does PROVIDED the scorer can exhibit a reasonable influence on the plane of the ball…..rotation, spin etc.
If it leaves his fingertips and the ball turns, moves etc due to inertia, and not direct influence by the scoring player, but then he gets fingers on it again before it hits the ground, that is not control unless the scoring player has exhibited control of the ball in this instance, not merely downward pressure.
Having said that, i think its BS either way King Sirro. My opinion is you cant control a ball with the last joint in your pinky, but that is not NRL opinion.