Pawsandclaws
New member
@ said:@ said:@ said:Woods also only wins 45% of the play the balls. Ranked 46th amongst forwards. That is a tricky KPI though as usually bench forwards dominate this stat as opposed to starting forwards.
The fact that our forwards fall apart as soon as he has left the field suggests he is worth far more to us than say the Bulldogs.
That's a simplistic way of looking at it. It's all about dynamic. Unfortunately by my analysis the tigers can't afford to pay more than 600k for woods because his numbers don't justify it. The real area where the tigers are lacking is bench forwards impact. Giving woods 850K will only be to the detriment of the teams success and depth.
Out of interest, how do you factor In the opportunity cost of subsidising players' salaries at other clubs?
We pay for two well known players to play at other clubs, the sum of those two salaries may allow us to purchase one or two very good NRL quality forwards such as McQueen.
Also, what weighting is provided to Woods knowing that he is carrying a far greater burden than say Klemmer or Boyd who have far better forwards around them?