Weststigers, I appreciate your candour.
But I think you've misunderstood what visibility means in this context.
No one's demanding a billboard.
We're talking about proportion...recognising the contribution of a stakeholder that continues to fund development, field teams, and form the backbone of junior pathways.
That's not "rubbing it in"...it's reminding people that this isn't a branding exercise, it's a JV.
You compared it to Wesfarmers owning retail brands.
But footy isn't retail...it's tribal, it's communal, and it's built on loyalty.
You can't equate club identity with commercial anonymity.
A club's soul isn't tucked away in holding structures...it's worn, waved, and carried by supporters who shaped it.
If that Magpie sleeve is "unsightly" to you, I respect your view.
But for many, it's the last stitch of recognition holding decades of pride together.
And you're right...I am a Magpie supporter.
That's my foundation.
But I have also supported Wests Tigers for 25 years.
Wanting balanced representation within that doesn't mean disloyalty.
It means I care enough to speak when I feel something is fading that still matters.
A JV shouldn't erase one half to appease comfort.
Visibility isn't dominance...it's acknowledgement.
And when legacy goes unacknowledged, that's when supporters feel pushed to the fringe.