avocadoontoast
Well-known member
@Russell said in [Matterson unhappy at Tigers?](/post/1072043) said:@avocadoontoast said in [Matterson unhappy at Tigers?](/post/1072042) said:@Russell said in [Matterson unhappy at Tigers?](/post/1072040) said:@avocadoontoast said in [Matterson unhappy at Tigers?](/post/1072039) said:@Russell said in [Matterson unhappy at Tigers?](/post/1072031) said:@avocadoontoast said in [Matterson unhappy at Tigers?](/post/1072029) said:@TheDaBoss said in [Matterson unhappy at Tigers?](/post/1072019) said:@happy_tiger said in [Matterson unhappy at Tigers?](/post/1072017) said:http://www.msn.com/en-au/sport/rugby-league/ryan-matterson-could-be-forced-to-stay-at-wests-tigers-report/ar-AAIWq1j?ocid=ientp
okay
so is it going to be a case of him staying in reggies, or the case of him playing first grade and us fans and him putting all drama behind him...
if he remains there is no way he's playing reggies.
Agree Avo - I would sit him out for 2 years. A lesson learned for everyone that comes to WT.
What lesson? That we'll pay you >$800k to do nothing for 2 years? Not much of a deterrent and at the same time our best player sits on the sideline and eats up salary cap money. Struggling to make sense of that argument sorry Russ.
Matterson is clearly a bit of a brat but if we're paying him, he plays.
Or tanks.
There is zero upside to your scenario other than throwing money down the toilet. We're already wasting enough money with people like Reynolds, Packer and Liddle on our books. We don't have any more to waste.
Just my opinion - which I am entitled to Avo.
Yours is play him and see if there are consequences. You are entitled that opinion.
If he tanks for two years noone will ever sign him. this isn't a Moses type situation where he'd already signed elsewhere.