gallagher
Well-known member
@Telltails said in [Knee injury may force Matulino to hang up boots](/post/1071161) said:@gallagher said in [Knee injury may force Matulino to hang up boots](/post/1071158) said:@Telltails said in [Knee injury may force Matulino to hang up boots](/post/1071153) said:@jirskyr said in [Knee injury may force Matulino to hang up boots](/post/1071128) said:@ElleryHanley said in [Knee injury may force Matulino to hang up boots](/post/1071076) said:Pascoe vouched for Cleary from years of working together and handed him the keys to everything. I may sound harsh, but it was Pascoe’s job to get that charachter assessment right.
I'm pretty sure it's the Board that defines the power and scope of the Head Coach, not the CEO. Pascoe may have vouched for Cleary, but the Board hired him and the Board set the parameters of his station.
The CEO works at the discretion of the Board - cannot over-rule them.
Cleary came with a reputation and credentials aside of having worked before with Pascoe that were well known, and if character assessment in the NRL is determined by hiring people that are not tempted by money and opportunity then all CEO's have little hope of getting that right.
You can blame Pascoe for the Ambassador stuff up but not for the choices Ivan Cleary made - unless of course your motivation is to attack Pascoe.
The CEO of the NRL doesn't enjoy the same leeway on here.
Clearly. Seibold did exactly the same thing to South's. And their CEO did what ours did got a better replacement - like all good CEO's should do.
Totally agree. But there are some that want to credit Pascoe for signing Madge but wont hold him to account for signing Cleary, his mate.