@Chicken_Faced_Killa said in [Corona impact on NRL\.\.\.?](/post/1136879) said:
Things are starting to get messy in regards to money. I’m sure they have put layers into the pay cut plan for players but how this works when they have no idea how many games are going to be played. Do the players take the full cut now and get an increase if games get played or do they pay them another rate now and it goes down as more games are lost?
I know in the AFL players look like taking a 50% paycut, and there’s talk the AFL want to push that to 75 ?
50% pay cut is massive for anyone but at least they will still be getting paid. Is going to be interesting how well the players take it and how they are perceived in public for their reactions.
Exactly mate. They need to compare it to the rest of the world and be thankful they have a job.
Once we're past this, the players CBA needs to be looked at. Sure, the NRL might have not saved as much as they should have, but fundamentally it comes down to the players taking too much of the revenue in wages year on year.
There needs to be a cash reserve put aside large enough for the game to skip a year.
Good luck getting that past the NRLPA and clubs.
But I do agree that the game needs a rainy day fund.
Yeah, might be a bit of back and forth - It's not the most intelligent room. But as long as they stipulate the 2 scenarios, then it should be pretty clear. i.e. in this situation, they get paid or don't get paid.
The fund can also grow as an endowment and second revenue stream for the game. Much like what the Tigers have done with the WT Foundation.