@tiger-tragic said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1429113) said:
Gladbags is a flawed and dangerous person and leader. Stubborn to political ideology, arrogant to deflect any criticism and close minded to any policy settings that have "worked" elsewhere. There is clear evidence that a more stirct and stringent lockdown, implemented after just a couple of delta cases surfaced, would have had this under control by now. Evidence?? Try Victoria and SA. She is leading us to hell in a handbasket. But, just like Scummo, she'll blame it all on 'health advice" and try to convince us she's the saviour.
Guess what Gladbags and Scummo?? We're not buying it. You're cooked. Resign before you cause even more pain for the citizens you purport to represent.
can't lock down the eastern suburbs when it all started, it would upset too many people with too much money and power
She had no issues locking us down on the Sydney Northern beaches at xmas (safe liberal area) with a less severe outbreak in summer.She has failed the people of this country/state yet again but you wont read about it in the murdoch media.
My take is that you guys are way too harsh on Gladys. I reckon she is good.
My take is the same as @mike. The delta variant is significantly more contagious and it's getting out. We can't live with lock downs going forward anyway.
There is one way out of this for the world and that is get vaccinated. Those that choose not to get vaccinated get reduced rights. On this basis I can understand protests. I don't think though that we have a choice. We are going to have to limit people's freedoms and rights (the unvaccinated) to protect other peoples freedoms and rights (the vaccinated).
I'm not political. The only people I hate are the loony right and I don't put Gladys in that category.
latest news is that pfizer efficacy drops to 60 odd% after 6 months especially against delta and now a 3rd dose is recommended.
don't think vaccination is the holy bullet, every health professional that is consulted states that vaccination isn't the only part of the answer.
even when the world is 80% vaccinated it won't be enough, there is no chance the world returns to normal in the next decade, the biggest difference between covid and other pandemics is that travel is so much more attainable and affordable, facilitating the virus mutations and continual threat. even if that threat becomes less fatal.
you can't limit people freedoms and rights because they have chosen not to be vaccinated, you can make it difficult for them like they did by restricting/reducing the child care benefits to families of unvaxxed kids, but they can't say you're unvaxxed so you have to live this way.
The data keeps changing and the virus mutates. The data you are referring to is out of Israel. It's not as simple as what you state as well because it still appears to protect you against hospitalization/death at rates above 90%. Interestingly it now appears that it's better to have an 8 week gap between shots.
If every person in the world was vaccinated we would halt the virus but that isn't going to happen.
It appears and this comes from even right wingers that if you are vaccinated you are basically safe. I don't think there is any option but to limit the rights of the unvaccinated and provide rights to the vaccinated. It's happening now too. On principle this to me sounds terrible but this is not an issue in relation to poverty or anything like that in developed countries. People are being offered vaccines and not taking them. If it's a personal choice that is cool but your personal choices have consequences. Get vaccinated or you can't go to the footy or a restaurant or travel or even hold your job. This is being legislated in various countries. People are angry and rightfully so.
You are right in that a high vaccination rate will not be a pancea. You need the whole world vaccinated and I think we will need booster shots to cater for variants going forward.