Coronavirus Outbreak

[mike]

I am finding it hard to believe that I just heard at the presser that a person knowingly worked whist infected at Liverpool hospital and is probably responsible for a number of deaths.

Edit; Been pointed out that I may have misheard.


The daughter and the lady that died was alarmed that the nurse involved was coughing uncontrollably in the ward !

The head of nursing needs to explain how that was allowed to happen if that is the case. To me it sounds like an environment has been created where breaches of health orders are accepted, it’s not.

 

[Tim Sheens]

I am finding it hard to believe that I just heard at the presser that a person knowingly worked whist infected at Liverpool hospital and is probably responsible for a number of deaths.

Edit; Been pointed out that I may have misheard.


The daughter and the lady that died was alarmed that the nurse involved was coughing uncontrollably in the ward ! This was quoted by the daughter on the news ..

Okay, well if that is correct it would seem plenty of dereliction of duty to share around the wards. The nurse was obviously infected with something and the public health message is to stay at home and get tested.

 

[innsaneink]

Hard to believe really... Hope it's not true

 

[Tim Sheens]

It’s pretty simple covid is here to stay...vaccine is our only solution...just gotta be patient with the role out

That's the agenda pushed by the NSW Government for failure to lockdown hard from the start.

We need Dan the lockdown man in NSW.

Such a shame that we got to this point, particularly as early on and despite the Ruby Princess debacle, Gladys joined Daniel in leading to save the country from the initial wave by going against the wanting to let it rip prefered federal approach. Stating that they were taking steps to protect more than half the nation's population despite the opposition and going it alone.

Gladys has generally done covid well, though unlike the other Liberal Premiers, stooping to becoming a puppet like mouthpiece for her federal contemporaries in fermenting division amongst our federation has long been an issue and is biting most of us for months now.

 

[swag_tiger]

I love it how suddenly there are so many experts in human rights and the law as soon as these lockdowns started.

 

[Demps]

I love it how suddenly there are so many experts in human rights and the law as soon as these lockdowns started.

Professor Roy Asotasi.

 

[swag_tiger]

There's something called section 7 of the public health act that has been into effect since 2010.so feels like they make things up to suite there agenda.

 

[Nelson]

There's something called section 7 of the public health act that has been into effect since 2010.so feels like they make things up to suite there agenda.

A similar power has been around for a lot longer than that. It was section 5 of the Public Health Act 1991 and there were broad powers under the Public Health Act 1902 as well.

 

[Tiger Beach]

I love it how suddenly there are so many experts in human rights and the law as soon as these lockdowns started.

Maybe when your human rights are threatened you take more of an interest in educating yourself

Those that are unaware of their rights have none

 

[swag_tiger]

I love it how suddenly there are so many experts in human rights and the law as soon as these lockdowns started.

Maybe when your human rights are threatened you take more of an interest in educating yourself

Those that are unaware of their rights have none

So people who are following the orders have no rights?

 

[swag_tiger]

There's something called section 7 of the public health act that has been into effect since 2010.so feels like they make things up to suite there agenda.

A similar power has been around for a lot longer than that. It was section 5 of the Public Health Act 1991 and there were broad powers under the Public Health Act 1902 as well.

So there's nothing illegal about what the government's doing atm.

 

[Nelson]

There's something called section 7 of the public health act that has been into effect since 2010.so feels like they make things up to suite there agenda.

A similar power has been around for a lot longer than that. It was section 5 of the Public Health Act 1991 and there were broad powers under the Public Health Act 1902 as well.

So there's nothing illegal about what the government's doing atm.

No, nor is there any reasonable argument that it's illegal, otherwise some muppet would have tried to make their name challenging it.

 

[Tiger Beach]

This won’t be popular here but the sheer volume of adverse reactions and deaths evidenced here warrants it’s sharing

https://www.expandingawarenessrelations.com/vaccination-deaths-frontline-workers-testimonies-vaers-reports/

Argue it all you like but let it exist for all to see, review, research and discuss

Oh good, a whole pile of personalised, anecdotal evidence that will be overweighted and distort people's risk perception.

We see it the other way every day in the media and much of it is relayed here

What part of this is a breach of our rights? Because no one here has the right to pass on covid.

This was in response to a separate issue

I don’t know, maybe their right to live

 

[mike]

This won’t be popular here but the sheer volume of adverse reactions and deaths evidenced here warrants it’s sharing

https://www.expandingawarenessrelations.com/vaccination-deaths-frontline-workers-testimonies-vaers-reports/

Argue it all you like but let it exist for all to see, review, research and discuss

Oh good, a whole pile of personalised, anecdotal evidence that will be overweighted and distort people's risk perception.

We see it the other way every day in the media and much of it is relayed here

Rubbish, nobody is suggesting that the vaccines carry no risk. They are saying that people should perceive the risk based on probabilistic evidence. That website is fearmongering.

The fearmongering is in every newspaper and on every news report

Of course it is Sherlock, that’s what gets clicks and views. Don’t tell me you are only just realising this.

 

[swag_tiger]

This won’t be popular here but the sheer volume of adverse reactions and deaths evidenced here warrants it’s sharing

https://www.expandingawarenessrelations.com/vaccination-deaths-frontline-workers-testimonies-vaers-reports/

Argue it all you like but let it exist for all to see, review, research and discuss

Oh good, a whole pile of personalised, anecdotal evidence that will be overweighted and distort people's risk perception.

We see it the other way every day in the media and much of it is relayed here

What part of this is a breach of our rights? Because no one here has the right to pass on covid.

This was in response to a separate issue

I don’t know, maybe their right to live

So lockdowns are a breach of our right to live?

 

[Tiger Beach]

This won’t be popular here but the sheer volume of adverse reactions and deaths evidenced here warrants it’s sharing

https://www.expandingawarenessrelations.com/vaccination-deaths-frontline-workers-testimonies-vaers-reports/

Argue it all you like but let it exist for all to see, review, research and discuss

Oh good, a whole pile of personalised, anecdotal evidence that will be overweighted and distort people's risk perception.

We see it the other way every day in the media and much of it is relayed here

Rubbish, nobody is suggesting that the vaccines carry no risk. They are saying that people should perceive the risk based on probabilistic evidence. That website is fearmongering.

The fearmongering is in every newspaper and on every news report

Of course it is Sherlock, that’s what gets clicks and views. Don’t tell me you are only just realising this.

So what can I trust from the media?
That’s important to know at times like these

 

[Guest]

I love it how suddenly there are so many experts in human rights and the law as soon as these lockdowns started.

Maybe when your human rights are threatened you take more of an interest in educating yourself

Those that are unaware of their rights have none

Consider this a warning over posting links to crap information. You've been banned for it previously and if it happens again there won't be any prizes for guessing what my recourse will be.

 

[earl]

Consider this a warning over posting links to crap information

This guy keeps lying to people. I don't get it.

 

[Tim Sheens]

This won’t be popular here but the sheer volume of adverse reactions and deaths evidenced here warrants it’s sharing

https://www.expandingawarenessrelations.com/vaccination-deaths-frontline-workers-testimonies-vaers-reports/

Argue it all you like but let it exist for all to see, review, research and discuss

Oh good, a whole pile of personalised, anecdotal evidence that will be overweighted and distort people's risk perception.

We see it the other way every day in the media and much of it is relayed here

Rubbish, nobody is suggesting that the vaccines carry no risk. They are saying that people should perceive the risk based on probabilistic evidence. That website is fearmongering.

The fearmongering is in every newspaper and on every news report

Of course it is Sherlock, that’s what gets clicks and views. Don’t tell me you are only just realising this.

So what can I trust from the media?
That’s important to know at times like these

An organisation that has a charter to be impartial.

 

[cochise]

Consider this a warning over posting links to crap information

This guy keeps lying to people. I don't get it.

His post has been deleted along with a number that quoted his.