earl
Well-known member
@swag_tiger said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1513396) said:@earl said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1513356) said:@eyeofthetiger-0 said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1513344) said:https://amp.theguardian.com/world/2021/dec/01/covid-19-variants-omicron-may-not-evolve-less-danger-time-nervtag-uk
Early testing results concerning that it’s not less dangerous……
Let's wait and see. I don't go for the dramatics. Calm, logical and rational.
What is interesting though is that your group seems to be all over the place:-
1. COVID isn't real.
2. PCR tests don't work.
3. The virus doesn't do any damage. 99.95% of people are okay.
4. Vaccines don't work.
5. The virus could mutate to be much more virulent.
The arguments aren't even internally consistent.
If I was an anti-vaxxer (and for instance I don't think the case for vaccinating kids is very strong) I'd argue that the risk-reward benefit for me is not in my favor and I am prepared to take the risk. That is a rational coherent argument. I've heard Kelly Slater and Joe Rogan state this argument. I don't agree with it but at least it's rational.
My concern with what you guys state is that it isn't factual. Most of the time it's nonsense.
In some countries with high adult vaxx rates it's the kids that are the holders of the virus.
I stated earlier that I think this is the big reason to vaccinate kids.