@magpie_magic said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1459364) said:
@tiger5150 said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1459352) said:
@magpie_magic said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1459311) said:
@trusted_insider said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1459288) said:

These are the stats that I was pointing to. ***5 deaths fully vaxed*** and many serious cases are not the numbers I expected from fully vaccinated individuals, we were told vaccination virtually eliminates getting very sick and considering Australia's relatively low case numbers this wouldn't conform to most people view of a high degree of protection sadly imo. AZ has also been responsible for 7 deaths and 10s of people seriously ill maybe permanently so just in Australia this year.
5 deaths is totally misleading. All of them older than 70. Two over 90, one over 80. I dont think its unreasonable that if you are older than 90 that if you catch it you are in serious trouble regardless of vax. It also doesnt back up your claim that fully vaxxed people are in ICU (0%).
So can't see the issues some of you may have with my views.
I have no issues with anyones views if based on some reality. Your posts talk of fully vaxxed people in ICU, the data doesnt back it up. Personally when someone espouses an opinion and then doubles down in the face of contradicatory information, I then have a problem with it.
I mentioned ***hearing of*** people fully vaxed dying and read of people fully vaxed in icu. These stats are for before 14 August, things have moved on since. That was my claim and it has been backed up.
No your claim that people have died has been backed up, your claim of fully vaxxed in ICU has not been backed up by any data or information.
When you made these claims I didnt say you are full of it, I asked for information that confirms it. The deaths have been confirmed, the ICU has not (based on the information provided).
The fact that you keep saying that this claim has been backed up despite the fact that it hasnt, doesnt strengthen your integrity IMO.
What's over 70 got to do with it?
They are more at risk of dying? Pretty simple I would have thought.
And you reckon my views are not based on any reality.
I dont know if your views are based on reality, thats what Im trying to determine as we all should here. To date I still havent seen any evidence that fully vaxed people are in ICU so your view that you may have heard isnt based on any data that I have seen.
>And I am sure I read of fully vaxed people in icu since August 14.
Im not questioning whether you heard it or believe it, Im asking for information that indicates its real.
What contradictory information?
You are stating that fully vaxed people are in ICU, the information provided and that you say "backs you up", ***contradicts*** you.
As I said I was questioned for bringing up double vaxed deaths and now get told well their over 70 anyway. That's the vulnerable age,
And?
Yes we questioned you when you raised double vaxxed deaths and the information came up that this is true. When you originally posted this, it was in the context that this information (fully vaxxed deaths and ICU) was causing confusion regarding vaccine uptake. I'd put it to you that the fact that all of the 5 deaths are 70+, 3 are 80+ and 2 90+ is important contextual information in making that decision regarding vaccination. If anyone is going to die after contracting COVID double vaxxed a 90yo is obviously more likely.