Coronavirus Outbreak

[TrueTiger]

I think the vaccine did work against Delta and it showed it in the fact the cases started to drop as NSW went on the Vaccine blitz.

Could be,but then the NSW Govt extended the lockdown from 1st Dec to 15th Dec to punish the unvaxed because the hesitency was high....
People started to wake up and the Govt had to show a heavy hand that we must stick to the narrative.....
funny thing is we all make decisions from our own way of thinking...not someone forcing a decision upon us...

 

[Harvey]

Robust actions hmmmm. This is delta all over again

It appears more contagious that Delta but potentially not as virulent. We also handled Delta like champions due predominantly to high vaccination rates.

This is not an anti-vaxxer narrative.

‘We also handled Delta like champions due predominantly to high vaccination rates..’

No doubt you have factual data that proves this?
The population was locked up and isolated from each other you clown. Vaccinated people are dying. There is no proof that vaccination is the ‘champion’ ingredient.
You are an absolute myth mate, you avoid every legitimate argument that you don’t have a favourable answer for and divert to your standard reset responses of ‘politics’, ‘accepted science’ and all the cliché negative stigma crap.
You cherry pick your battles blatantly.
Constantly yelling that no one gets to claim false facts, but here you go doing that exact thing.
Full.Of.Crap.Earl.Compliance.Gov.

It was the lockdowns that stopped the spread, not the vaccines.

And if I understand it correctly, it is the vaccines which will stop (or limit) the lockdowns.

Yep, that’s the carrot the government’s dangling to achieve their numbers.
Then we just accept the outbreaks among a vaccinated population, and deaths, and say lucky we’re all vaccinated or things would’ve been so much worse right ?
Earl.Gov will even present a peer reviewed ‘accepted study’ confirming the hypothetical disaster averted.

I like the Greek option. If you choose not to be vaccinated, there is a levy for those that choose not to be vaccinated due to the costs they will impose on the health system.

 

[TrueTiger]

Robust actions hmmmm. This is delta all over again

It appears more contagious that Delta but potentially not as virulent. We also handled Delta like champions due predominantly to high vaccination rates.

This is not an anti-vaxxer narrative.

‘We also handled Delta like champions due predominantly to high vaccination rates..’

No doubt you have factual data that proves this?
The population was locked up and isolated from each other you clown. Vaccinated people are dying. There is no proof that vaccination is the ‘champion’ ingredient.
You are an absolute myth mate, you avoid every legitimate argument that you don’t have a favourable answer for and divert to your standard reset responses of ‘politics’, ‘accepted science’ and all the cliché negative stigma crap.
You cherry pick your battles blatantly.
Constantly yelling that no one gets to claim false facts, but here you go doing that exact thing.
Full.Of.Crap.Earl.Compliance.Gov.

It was the lockdowns that stopped the spread, not the vaccines.

And if I understand it correctly, it is the vaccines which will stop (or limit) the lockdowns.

Yep, that’s the carrot the government’s dangling to achieve their numbers.
Then we just accept the outbreaks among a vaccinated population, and deaths, and say lucky we’re all vaccinated or things would’ve been so much worse right ?
Earl.Gov will even present a peer reviewed ‘accepted study’ confirming the hypothetical disaster averted.

I like the Greek option. If you choose not to be vaccinated, there is a levy for those that choose not to be vaccinated due to the costs they will impose on the health system.

What about the cost of the vaxxed within the health system...do they get a levy placed on them as well...I mean they have been hospitalised with heart,kidney,stroke and blood clotting illnesses due to the vax ?

 

[Harvey]

Robust actions hmmmm. This is delta all over again

It appears more contagious that Delta but potentially not as virulent. We also handled Delta like champions due predominantly to high vaccination rates.

This is not an anti-vaxxer narrative.

‘We also handled Delta like champions due predominantly to high vaccination rates..’

No doubt you have factual data that proves this?
The population was locked up and isolated from each other you clown. Vaccinated people are dying. There is no proof that vaccination is the ‘champion’ ingredient.
You are an absolute myth mate, you avoid every legitimate argument that you don’t have a favourable answer for and divert to your standard reset responses of ‘politics’, ‘accepted science’ and all the cliché negative stigma crap.
You cherry pick your battles blatantly.
Constantly yelling that no one gets to claim false facts, but here you go doing that exact thing.
Full.Of.Crap.Earl.Compliance.Gov.

It was the lockdowns that stopped the spread, not the vaccines.

And if I understand it correctly, it is the vaccines which will stop (or limit) the lockdowns.

Yep, that’s the carrot the government’s dangling to achieve their numbers.
Then we just accept the outbreaks among a vaccinated population, and deaths, and say lucky we’re all vaccinated or things would’ve been so much worse right ?
Earl.Gov will even present a peer reviewed ‘accepted study’ confirming the hypothetical disaster averted.

I like the Greek option. If you choose not to be vaccinated, there is a levy for those that choose not to be vaccinated due to the costs they will impose on the health system.

What about the cost of the vaxxed within the health system...do they get a levy placed on them as well...I mean they have been hospitalised with heart,kidney,stroke and blood clotting illnesses due to the vax ?

I am not sure that they are able to pass any of those on to others

 

[TrueTiger]

Robust actions hmmmm. This is delta all over again

It appears more contagious that Delta but potentially not as virulent. We also handled Delta like champions due predominantly to high vaccination rates.

This is not an anti-vaxxer narrative.

‘We also handled Delta like champions due predominantly to high vaccination rates..’

No doubt you have factual data that proves this?
The population was locked up and isolated from each other you clown. Vaccinated people are dying. There is no proof that vaccination is the ‘champion’ ingredient.
You are an absolute myth mate, you avoid every legitimate argument that you don’t have a favourable answer for and divert to your standard reset responses of ‘politics’, ‘accepted science’ and all the cliché negative stigma crap.
You cherry pick your battles blatantly.
Constantly yelling that no one gets to claim false facts, but here you go doing that exact thing.
Full.Of.Crap.Earl.Compliance.Gov.

It was the lockdowns that stopped the spread, not the vaccines.

And if I understand it correctly, it is the vaccines which will stop (or limit) the lockdowns.

Yep, that’s the carrot the government’s dangling to achieve their numbers.
Then we just accept the outbreaks among a vaccinated population, and deaths, and say lucky we’re all vaccinated or things would’ve been so much worse right ?
Earl.Gov will even present a peer reviewed ‘accepted study’ confirming the hypothetical disaster averted.

I like the Greek option. If you choose not to be vaccinated, there is a levy for those that choose not to be vaccinated due to the costs they will impose on the health system.

What about the cost of the vaxxed within the health system...do they get a levy placed on them as well...I mean they have been hospitalised with heart,kidney,stroke and blood clotting illnesses due to the vax ?

I am not sure that they are able to pass any of those on to others

Selected response Harv....?...
the vaxxed can shed YES,but do your research and find out how many adverse reactions the vaxxed get and end up in hospital....hint VAERS....

 

[Harvey]

Robust actions hmmmm. This is delta all over again

It appears more contagious that Delta but potentially not as virulent. We also handled Delta like champions due predominantly to high vaccination rates.

This is not an anti-vaxxer narrative.

‘We also handled Delta like champions due predominantly to high vaccination rates..’

No doubt you have factual data that proves this?
The population was locked up and isolated from each other you clown. Vaccinated people are dying. There is no proof that vaccination is the ‘champion’ ingredient.
You are an absolute myth mate, you avoid every legitimate argument that you don’t have a favourable answer for and divert to your standard reset responses of ‘politics’, ‘accepted science’ and all the cliché negative stigma crap.
You cherry pick your battles blatantly.
Constantly yelling that no one gets to claim false facts, but here you go doing that exact thing.
Full.Of.Crap.Earl.Compliance.Gov.

It was the lockdowns that stopped the spread, not the vaccines.

And if I understand it correctly, it is the vaccines which will stop (or limit) the lockdowns.

Yep, that’s the carrot the government’s dangling to achieve their numbers.
Then we just accept the outbreaks among a vaccinated population, and deaths, and say lucky we’re all vaccinated or things would’ve been so much worse right ?
Earl.Gov will even present a peer reviewed ‘accepted study’ confirming the hypothetical disaster averted.

I like the Greek option. If you choose not to be vaccinated, there is a levy for those that choose not to be vaccinated due to the costs they will impose on the health system.

What about the cost of the vaxxed within the health system...do they get a levy placed on them as well...I mean they have been hospitalised with heart,kidney,stroke and blood clotting illnesses due to the vax ?

I am not sure that they are able to pass any of those on to others

Selected response Harv....?...
the vaxxed can shed YES,but do your research and find out how many adverse reactions the vaxxed get and end up in hospital....hint VAERS....

Got as far as this:
VAERS accepts reports of adverse events and reactions that occur following vaccination. Healthcare providers, vaccine manufacturers, and the public can submit reports to the system. While very important in monitoring vaccine safety, VAERS reports alone cannot be used to determine if a vaccine caused or contributed to an adverse event or illness. The reports may contain information that is incomplete, inaccurate, coincidental, or unverifiable. In large part, reports to VAERS are voluntary, which means they are subject to biases. This creates specific limitations on how the data can be used scientifically. Data from VAERS reports should always be interpreted with these limitations in mind.

 

[TrueTiger]

Robust actions hmmmm. This is delta all over again

It appears more contagious that Delta but potentially not as virulent. We also handled Delta like champions due predominantly to high vaccination rates.

This is not an anti-vaxxer narrative.

‘We also handled Delta like champions due predominantly to high vaccination rates..’

No doubt you have factual data that proves this?
The population was locked up and isolated from each other you clown. Vaccinated people are dying. There is no proof that vaccination is the ‘champion’ ingredient.
You are an absolute myth mate, you avoid every legitimate argument that you don’t have a favourable answer for and divert to your standard reset responses of ‘politics’, ‘accepted science’ and all the cliché negative stigma crap.
You cherry pick your battles blatantly.
Constantly yelling that no one gets to claim false facts, but here you go doing that exact thing.
Full.Of.Crap.Earl.Compliance.Gov.

It was the lockdowns that stopped the spread, not the vaccines.

And if I understand it correctly, it is the vaccines which will stop (or limit) the lockdowns.

Yep, that’s the carrot the government’s dangling to achieve their numbers.
Then we just accept the outbreaks among a vaccinated population, and deaths, and say lucky we’re all vaccinated or things would’ve been so much worse right ?
Earl.Gov will even present a peer reviewed ‘accepted study’ confirming the hypothetical disaster averted.

I like the Greek option. If you choose not to be vaccinated, there is a levy for those that choose not to be vaccinated due to the costs they will impose on the health system.

What about the cost of the vaxxed within the health system...do they get a levy placed on them as well...I mean they have been hospitalised with heart,kidney,stroke and blood clotting illnesses due to the vax ?

I am not sure that they are able to pass any of those on to others

Selected response Harv....?...
the vaxxed can shed YES,but do your research and find out how many adverse reactions the vaxxed get and end up in hospital....hint VAERS....

Got as far as this:
VAERS accepts reports of adverse events and reactions that occur following vaccination. Healthcare providers, vaccine manufacturers, and the public can submit reports to the system. While very important in monitoring vaccine safety, VAERS reports alone cannot be used to determine if a vaccine caused or contributed to an adverse event or illness. The reports may contain information that is incomplete, inaccurate, coincidental, or unverifiable. In large part, reports to VAERS are voluntary, which means they are subject to biases. This creates specific limitations on how the data can be used scientifically. Data from VAERS reports should always be interpreted with these limitations in mind.

Data from WHO and WEF should also be interpretted with great care....they both have an agenda that doesnt help humanity....

 

[Eyeofthetiger 0]

The levy will be the least of our problems. People will lose there homes soon enough. The government or banks won’t be bailing out people if omicron takes hold and has a mortality rate higher than delta.

 

[earl]

What about unvaccinated people get COVID because of the vaccinated shedding it?
Can’t work out whether it is comedy gold, paranoid delusion or understand alternate views.

That is pretty good.

I got some beauties.

My SIL told my wife that it was terrible to get vaccinated because when you got it you weren't that sick and therefore you could pass it on to other people. She has a point but it's sort of missing the point.

The whole family did the ignore COVID restrictions as much as possible, take Ivermectin (a drug which the clinical evidence shows is not statistically effective) and get through it. They got it and they got through it. They've told me some beauties like 9/11 was a govt conspiracy to control us. I tell you what's funny - they aren't dumb. Their kids all get over 90 in the HSC.

 

[colinbh]

Turn it up you blokes. You don't have a clue about any of this.

 

[swag_tiger]

I think the vaccine did work against Delta and it showed it in the fact the cases started to drop as NSW went on the Vaccine blitz.

Could be,but then the NSW Govt extended the lockdown from 1st Dec to 15th Dec to punish the unvaxed because the hesitency was high....
People started to wake up and the Govt had to show a heavy hand that we must stick to the narrative.....
funny thing is we all make decisions from our own way of thinking...not someone forcing a decision upon us...

What would you do if the new Virus took a hold in NSW?

 

[swag_tiger]

Turn it up you blokes. You don't have a clue about any of this.

Enlighten us then will you.

 

[Harvey]

Robust actions hmmmm. This is delta all over again

It appears more contagious that Delta but potentially not as virulent. We also handled Delta like champions due predominantly to high vaccination rates.

This is not an anti-vaxxer narrative.

‘We also handled Delta like champions due predominantly to high vaccination rates..’

No doubt you have factual data that proves this?
The population was locked up and isolated from each other you clown. Vaccinated people are dying. There is no proof that vaccination is the ‘champion’ ingredient.
You are an absolute myth mate, you avoid every legitimate argument that you don’t have a favourable answer for and divert to your standard reset responses of ‘politics’, ‘accepted science’ and all the cliché negative stigma crap.
You cherry pick your battles blatantly.
Constantly yelling that no one gets to claim false facts, but here you go doing that exact thing.
Full.Of.Crap.Earl.Compliance.Gov.

It was the lockdowns that stopped the spread, not the vaccines.

And if I understand it correctly, it is the vaccines which will stop (or limit) the lockdowns.

Yep, that’s the carrot the government’s dangling to achieve their numbers.
Then we just accept the outbreaks among a vaccinated population, and deaths, and say lucky we’re all vaccinated or things would’ve been so much worse right ?
Earl.Gov will even present a peer reviewed ‘accepted study’ confirming the hypothetical disaster averted.

I like the Greek option. If you choose not to be vaccinated, there is a levy for those that choose not to be vaccinated due to the costs they will impose on the health system.

What about the cost of the vaxxed within the health system...do they get a levy placed on them as well...I mean they have been hospitalised with heart,kidney,stroke and blood clotting illnesses due to the vax ?

I am not sure that they are able to pass any of those on to others

Selected response Harv....?...
the vaxxed can shed YES,but do your research and find out how many adverse reactions the vaxxed get and end up in hospital....hint VAERS....

Got as far as this:
VAERS accepts reports of adverse events and reactions that occur following vaccination. Healthcare providers, vaccine manufacturers, and the public can submit reports to the system. While very important in monitoring vaccine safety, VAERS reports alone cannot be used to determine if a vaccine caused or contributed to an adverse event or illness. The reports may contain information that is incomplete, inaccurate, coincidental, or unverifiable. In large part, reports to VAERS are voluntary, which means they are subject to biases. This creates specific limitations on how the data can be used scientifically. Data from VAERS reports should always be interpreted with these limitations in mind.

Data from WHO and WEF should also be interpretted with great care....they both have an agenda that doesnt help humanity....

The only reliable sources are facebook, youtube (depending on who posted) and certain blog sites.

Can i recommend David Icke, he has all the coronavirus news. Has been proven right previously through his expose of the reptilians (aka lizard people).

I couldn't help myself and so had a look. Personally I like the new one that the vaccine has given everyone AIDs and the only way to stop the progression is to have a booster shot.

 

[earl]

I like the Greek option. If you choose not to be vaccinated, there is a levy for those that choose not to be vaccinated due to the costs they will impose on the health system.

I like this too. I mentioned this on here though and there was outrage. Is anything acceptable ? I honestly don't care know because we have a high vaccination rate. To me that has taken the pressure off the health system. It's worked. The proof is in the pudding. I should add that lockdowns enabled us to get vaccinated prior to moving back into normalcy.

People want the vaccine to cure everything and if it doesn't it doesn't work. It's not like that. It just improves your individual risk profile which improves societies and then at that broad level the health system can handle it.

There are two ways of viewing it individual risk and societal risk. If you choose to not get vaccinated and take on greater societal risk there should be a cost.

That to me also stops vaccine mandates.

 

[earl]

Robust actions hmmmm. This is delta all over again

It appears more contagious that Delta but potentially not as virulent. We also handled Delta like champions due predominantly to high vaccination rates.

This is not an anti-vaxxer narrative.

‘We also handled Delta like champions due predominantly to high vaccination rates..’

No doubt you have factual data that proves this?
The population was locked up and isolated from each other you clown. Vaccinated people are dying. There is no proof that vaccination is the ‘champion’ ingredient.
You are an absolute myth mate, you avoid every legitimate argument that you don’t have a favourable answer for and divert to your standard reset responses of ‘politics’, ‘accepted science’ and all the cliché negative stigma crap.
You cherry pick your battles blatantly.
Constantly yelling that no one gets to claim false facts, but here you go doing that exact thing.
Full.Of.Crap.Earl.Compliance.Gov.

It was the lockdowns that stopped the spread, not the vaccines.

And if I understand it correctly, it is the vaccines which will stop (or limit) the lockdowns.

Yep, that’s the carrot the government’s dangling to achieve their numbers.
Then we just accept the outbreaks among a vaccinated population, and deaths, and say lucky we’re all vaccinated or things would’ve been so much worse right ?
Earl.Gov will even present a peer reviewed ‘accepted study’ confirming the hypothetical disaster averted.

I like the Greek option. If you choose not to be vaccinated, there is a levy for those that choose not to be vaccinated due to the costs they will impose on the health system.

What about the cost of the vaxxed within the health system...do they get a levy placed on them as well...I mean they have been hospitalised with heart,kidney,stroke and blood clotting illnesses due to the vax ?

I am not sure that they are able to pass any of those on to others

Selected response Harv....?...
the vaxxed can shed YES,but do your research and find out how many adverse reactions the vaxxed get and end up in hospital....hint VAERS....

Got as far as this:
VAERS accepts reports of adverse events and reactions that occur following vaccination. Healthcare providers, vaccine manufacturers, and the public can submit reports to the system. While very important in monitoring vaccine safety, VAERS reports alone cannot be used to determine if a vaccine caused or contributed to an adverse event or illness. The reports may contain information that is incomplete, inaccurate, coincidental, or unverifiable. In large part, reports to VAERS are voluntary, which means they are subject to biases. This creates specific limitations on how the data can be used scientifically. Data from VAERS reports should always be interpreted with these limitations in mind.

Data from WHO and WEF should also be interpretted with great care....they both have an agenda that doesnt help humanity....

The only reliable sources are facebook, youtube (depending on who posted) and certain blog sites.

Can i recommend David Icke, he has all the coronavirus news. Has been proven right previously through his expose of the reptilians (aka lizard people).

I couldn't help myself and so had a look. Personally I like the new one that the vaccine has given everyone AIDs and the only way to stop the progression is to have a booster shot.

You must go and find random opinions from sites that state things like "Truth Warrior". This is where the good stuff lies.

 

[leichhardtjunior]

Robust actions hmmmm. This is delta all over again

It appears more contagious that Delta but potentially not as virulent. We also handled Delta like champions due predominantly to high vaccination rates.

This is not an anti-vaxxer narrative.

‘We also handled Delta like champions due predominantly to high vaccination rates..’

No doubt you have factual data that proves this?
The population was locked up and isolated from each other you clown. Vaccinated people are dying. There is no proof that vaccination is the ‘champion’ ingredient.
You are an absolute myth mate, you avoid every legitimate argument that you don’t have a favourable answer for and divert to your standard reset responses of ‘politics’, ‘accepted science’ and all the cliché negative stigma crap.
You cherry pick your battles blatantly.
Constantly yelling that no one gets to claim false facts, but here you go doing that exact thing.
Full.Of.Crap.Earl.Compliance.Gov.

It was the lockdowns that stopped the spread, not the vaccines.

And if I understand it correctly, it is the vaccines which will stop (or limit) the lockdowns.

Yep, that’s the carrot the government’s dangling to achieve their numbers.
Then we just accept the outbreaks among a vaccinated population, and deaths, and say lucky we’re all vaccinated or things would’ve been so much worse right ?
Earl.Gov will even present a peer reviewed ‘accepted study’ confirming the hypothetical disaster averted.

I like the Greek option. If you choose not to be vaccinated, there is a levy for those that choose not to be vaccinated due to the costs they will impose on the health system.

What about the cost of the vaxxed within the health system...do they get a levy placed on them as well...I mean they have been hospitalised with heart,kidney,stroke and blood clotting illnesses due to the vax ?

Solid logic TT
100% more hospitalisations due to adverse affects than covid patients.
Honest logic isn’t Harv’s aim tho.
I’ve heard this ‘impose a levy’ crap many times. From spiteful smug people.

 

[Eyeofthetiger 0]

I think the vaccine did work against Delta and it showed it in the fact the cases started to drop as NSW went on the Vaccine blitz.

Could be,but then the NSW Govt extended the lockdown from 1st Dec to 15th Dec to punish the unvaxed because the hesitency was high....
People started to wake up and the Govt had to show a heavy hand that we must stick to the narrative.....
funny thing is we all make decisions from our own way of thinking...not someone forcing a decision upon us...

What would you do if the new Virus took a hold in NSW?

I’d start figuring out a way to reduce debt

 

[Eyeofthetiger 0]

Robust actions hmmmm. This is delta all over again

It appears more contagious that Delta but potentially not as virulent. We also handled Delta like champions due predominantly to high vaccination rates.

This is not an anti-vaxxer narrative.

‘We also handled Delta like champions due predominantly to high vaccination rates..’

No doubt you have factual data that proves this?
The population was locked up and isolated from each other you clown. Vaccinated people are dying. There is no proof that vaccination is the ‘champion’ ingredient.
You are an absolute myth mate, you avoid every legitimate argument that you don’t have a favourable answer for and divert to your standard reset responses of ‘politics’, ‘accepted science’ and all the cliché negative stigma crap.
You cherry pick your battles blatantly.
Constantly yelling that no one gets to claim false facts, but here you go doing that exact thing.
Full.Of.Crap.Earl.Compliance.Gov.

It was the lockdowns that stopped the spread, not the vaccines.

And if I understand it correctly, it is the vaccines which will stop (or limit) the lockdowns.

Yep, that’s the carrot the government’s dangling to achieve their numbers.
Then we just accept the outbreaks among a vaccinated population, and deaths, and say lucky we’re all vaccinated or things would’ve been so much worse right ?
Earl.Gov will even present a peer reviewed ‘accepted study’ confirming the hypothetical disaster averted.

I like the Greek option. If you choose not to be vaccinated, there is a levy for those that choose not to be vaccinated due to the costs they will impose on the health system.

What about the cost of the vaxxed within the health system...do they get a levy placed on them as well...I mean they have been hospitalised with heart,kidney,stroke and blood clotting illnesses due to the vax ?

Solid logic TT
100% more hospitalisations due to adverse affects than covid patients.
Honest logic isn’t Harv’s aim tho.
I’ve heard this ‘impose a levy’ crap many times. From spiteful smug people.

Hypocritical people

 

[earl]

I think the vaccine did work against Delta and it showed it in the fact the cases started to drop as NSW went on the Vaccine blitz.

Could be,but then the NSW Govt extended the lockdown from 1st Dec to 15th Dec to punish the unvaxed because the hesitency was high....
People started to wake up and the Govt had to show a heavy hand that we must stick to the narrative.....
funny thing is we all make decisions from our own way of thinking...not someone forcing a decision upon us...

What would you do if the new Virus took a hold in NSW?

I’d start figuring out a way to reduce debt

The debt is clearly a problem. We should recognize how lucky we've been. We've managed the whole pandemic at like an A+ level. We've been lucky because we've been able to go into debt but it can't continue.

Maybe we could stretch some payments for another 3 years but they won't want to lock down anymore. I don't want that either. This are really freaken good atm.

 

[TrueTiger]

I think the vaccine did work against Delta and it showed it in the fact the cases started to drop as NSW went on the Vaccine blitz.

Could be,but then the NSW Govt extended the lockdown from 1st Dec to 15th Dec to punish the unvaxed because the hesitency was high....
People started to wake up and the Govt had to show a heavy hand that we must stick to the narrative.....
funny thing is we all make decisions from our own way of thinking...not someone forcing a decision upon us...

What would you do if the new Virus took a hold in NSW?

Do what I do now...look after myself and use theraputics to get me through...