Corporate reboot to placate Balmain and Wests factions

  • Thread starter Thread starter Guest
  • Start date Start date
G

Guest

Guest
Corporate reboot to placate Balmain and Wests factions
May 19, 2013
Adrian Proszenko
Chief Rugby League Reporter

Wests Tigers will work with ARLC boss Dave Smith in overhauling the corporate structure of the club to ensure a more harmonious relationship between the merged entities.

The Balmain and Western Suburbs factions have been in an uneasy alliance since they merged into Wests Tigers in 1999, with boardroom bickering a constant throughout their short history.

However, both parties have made a concerted effort to work more co-operatively and resolved at a board meeting last week to review the corporate structure of the club. The NRL has been asked to become heavily involved in the process to ensure the best possible outcome for all parties and align the club's strategic plan closely with that of the ARLC.

Chief executive Stephen Humphreys resigned on Friday night in the belief it would help the parties move forward together. Humphreys, Wests Tigers chairman Mike Bailey and deputy chairman Nick Di Girolamo sat down with Fairfax Media on Saturday in a show of unity.

Humphreys, who will remain at the club for the next two months, delivered the key goal: ''To be strongly branded and recognised as Wests Tigers. We all come from somewhere, but … over the next five years we need to be about Wests Tigers.''

The Tigers face numerous challenges on and off the field. They are in last position after being trounced 54-10 by South Sydney on Friday night, face a crippling injury toll and have reached a delicate point in negotiations to extend the contract of benched superstar Benji Marshall. But perhaps the biggest obstacle to long-term success is ensuring Balmain and Western Suburbs come together in more than name only.

''The reason we are sitting here and talking today is because we want this to work and work well,'' said Bailey, the Magpies representative. ''We can look back through history and point fingers sometimes at individuals, but we're not intending to do that. We're trying to move on together and we want to do it positively.''

To that end, Smith has been consulted about the organisational restructure and will provide counsel along with ARLC chairman John Grant. ''Mike and I have realised we face significant challenges in relation to our current structure and it's a significant step in our journey for the two of us to have a chat to John Grant and Dave Smith,'' said Balmain representative Di Girolamo. ''We need a structure which provides best corporate governance practices and long-term sustainability.''

While the situation is politically sensitive and the trio were reluctant to go into details, it's understood the system of rotating chairmen - a member of each faction chairs the joint-venture club for 12 months at a time - is likely to be scrapped. All parties agree that training facilities at Concord Oval are becoming outdated and that a strategy to establish a centre of excellence must be put in place. The officials will also work closely with the ARLC on stadia strategy as the game consolidates towards a handful of major venues.

There was also unanimous support for new coach Mick Potter, who has overseen a squad riddled with injuries in his first year in charge.

''He is doing a fine job and we have absolutely no criticism or questions of what he is doing,'' Bailey said. ''We're right behind him and that is myself, Nick and Stephen. We'll give him all the support we need for things to come together.''

Humphreys said he would work diligently on retention and recruitment before his departure. The former Balmain first-grader said he was confident of retaining Marshall and securing young playmakers Luke Brooks, Bayley Sironen and Mitchell Moses. ''Despite what some critics may say, our board is doing an excellent job in confronting what are some very difficult issues,'' he said.
 
Maybe this is the start of the WTs finally becoming to superclub we all know it should be…

What will the future bring?

:sign:
 
The board is just all blah blah ,anything to save their own bacon

Getting rid of the board is the only way forwards for the Tigers
 
Getting rid of the board will solve jack all. Whoever is elected to the board will always be responsible;

- in the first instance to serve the interest of their side of the faction
- to ensure there is 'equality' (meaning keeping up with the lowest common denominator)
- and lastly the interests of the 'weststigers'

The only way to improve the status quo would be to;

- merge everything under the weststigers banner (leagues club, foot clubs etc) more chance of hell freezing over

OR

- have a independent board selected in a similar vein to the commission with no affiliations to either club - again wont happen while the clubs put money towards the jv

Only potential option is for the wt to become a separate identity, funded by its own generated revenue (tv rights and sponsorship). Again this will never happen because neither balmain nor wests will give up their jv license.

More of this for the next 100 years I suspect.
 
Maybe if the NRL/ARLC put in specific guidelines relative the JV on the condition of licences being granted…we can finally move forward

Every NRL club has their own issues, each must be dealt with on their merit., for the betterment of the game first, and then the clubs.
 
Noticed they mentioned BAILEY sironen. I feel like he is gonna follow Curtis' shoes to become a fantastic back rower. Apparently he's already bigger than curtis, so it's likely he's just barraging his way through players in U18s as opposed to utilising kicking or stepping. Havent seen him play though, i think he's been injured.
 
This sounds like a positive move for the club to move forward but I highly doubt either side will just hand anything over. Going to be a long road to peace
 
@willow said:
The NRL has been asked to become heavily involved in the process to ensure the best possible outcome for all parties and align the club's strategic plan closely with that of the ARLC.

\

@willow said:
All parties agree that training facilities at Concord Oval are becoming outdated and that a strategy to establish a centre of excellence must be put in place. The officials will also work closely with the ARLC on stadia strategy as the game consolidates towards a handful of major venues.

Two key quotes. Wests Tigers want to know the strategic plan for the game before they make any strategic decisions.

Does the ARLC want less teams in Sydney?
Will Campbelltown Stadium be upgraded and form a part of stadia strategy?

In the end this is the position:
Western Suburbs want more presence in Campbelltown
Balmain wishes to remain in the city
Western Suburbs have financial strength
Balmain's financial strength is low

Can't agree, but importantly, both want to hold Wests Tigers together. Use the ARLC to get the best answer for both the club and the game. Good work, particularly wanting to know the stadia strategy.
 
Because they are only St George Illawarra in name and the Steelers really have no influence over it. The Steelers were a relatively new club anyway and the Dragons are ancient. We are two clubs with massive histories and both feel they are worth more than the other.
 
NRL deal with Tigers needs balance: Wests
AAP Ben Horne 19:24 AEST Sun May 19 2013

Financially powerful Western Suburbs are demanding to be on equal terms with Balmain in the struggling Wests Tigers merger.

However, the Magpies faction denied they would attempt to separate themselves from Balmain, saying it would be unrealistic for the foundation club to re-enter the NRL as a lone entity.

Wests Tigers Chairman Mike Bailey - who is from the Magpies side - along with deputy chairman Nick di Girolamo, met with the NRL a number of weeks ago to discuss the future direction and structure of the club.

The Wests Tigers board, which has long been a rocky marriage, will wait to hear back from the NRL before making a decision on the road ahead.

However, former TV weatherman Bailey said that while the board has often been at war with itself, the joint venture was in no danger of collapsing.

"We don't want it to collapse. Balmain don't want it to collapse, if I can talk for them as well. We want things to continue as they are from the point of view of this franchise," Bailey told AAP.

"I think we have to accept the way things are and we have to move forward with our only lifeline to the NRL.

"Yes, over the years there's been conflict on the Wests Tigers board. That's because when you put two clubs together, both of which would like to actually be independent, then inevitably there's a deal of tension one way or the other.

"Balmain might like to go it alone … And maybe some people in the Wests fraternity would too. But I think we've got to be realistic and say this joint venture, if we can call it that, has been there for 14 years.

"A lot of people have been born in that time. A lot of others have grown up in that time and they don't have the affinity that was there many years ago to either of the original sides that were foundation clubs in the rugby league."

Since the Wests Tigers were formed in 2000, the perception has been that the Balmain Tigers are the dominant force in the merger.

But the reality now is Balmain are strapped for cash and Western Suburbs are backed by two powerful Leagues clubs at Campbelltown and Ashfield.

Bailey said the Magpies faction are keen to turn around the one-sided perception, but under the banner of Wests Tigers.

"More than anything else, we're looking at being on an equal footing; for people to perceive we're on an equal footing and moving ahead together," Bailey said.

"I don't think it's a time for one side or the other to be putting up their hands and saying `we're in charge'."

Bailey said changing the name or the colours of the franchise was not something being considered.

"It's important we address things like (where the Magpie is on the jersey)," he said.

"That we make sure ... Wests are a part, a real part of this franchise. The same as Balmain are a real part. But most of all we have to remember this is Wests Tigers."

Bailey said the replacement of outgoing chief executive Stephen Humphreys would be "the best man for the job" and potential Magpies or Balmain ties won't be relevant.

The Chairman also said coach Mick Potter has the full support of the board despite his team's terrible on-field performances of late.
 
@Benjirific said:
NRL deal with Tigers needs balance: Wests
AAP Ben Horne 19:24 AEST Sun May 19 2013

Bailey said the Magpies faction are keen to turn around the one-sided perception, but under the banner of Wests Tigers.

"More than anything else, we're looking at being on an equal footing; for people to perceive we're on an equal footing and moving ahead together," Bailey said.

"I don't think it's a time for one side or the other to be putting up their hands and saying `we're in charge'."

Bailey said changing the name or the colours of the franchise was not something being considered.

**"It's important we address things like (where the Magpie is on the jersey)," he said.\
\
"That we make sure … Wests are a part, a real part of this franchise. The same as Balmain are a real part. But most of all we have to remember this is Wests Tigers."**

:unamused: One step forward, five steps back.

The fact that he thinks this is the important thing the club needs to address is exactly why this place is struggling at board level. We really do need some independence on the board, and in my honest opinion it is such a shame David Trodden stepped down last year because as much as some Magpies fans believe he was just a Balmain guy, all he genuinely cared about was the betterment of Wests Tigers.
 
With mention of the facilities at Concord Oval becoming dated and a Centre Of Excellence being mooted where would be the best location to establish a cutting edge training and educational centre.
Something closer to Campbelltown is what the Magpies faction would obviously want but realistically would Liverpool or something similar be the ideal compromise.
While it's interesting to note that the old Magpies fans are aggrieved at the lack of size of the Magpie on the sleeve and that some of the commentators fall back on old habits and refer to the side as Balmain the Maggies fans should look at the Balmain dilemma where there is now no longer a Senior Balmain side as they went with popular opinion and morphed into a Wests Tigers NSW Cup side.
Is there 'genuine' grievances between the board members or is this just a Media beat up because things aren't what we would normally expect in terms of results?.
 
At least the club is making the right noises here. I know talk can be cheap but rarely has anyone paid it the attention the past 48 hours have seen. Not saying we've turned a corner but perhaps now we begin to make choices that actually enhance wests tigers and not just support a certain identity or area.
 
Words are words and don't mean much but headed in the right direction based on the words. The stadia is a big issue how do you keep both sides happy as liechhardt is not upto standard and I can't see the government funding any upgrade. is an upgrade to concord the answer? In the end the board needs to be separate from wests and balmain. atleast they are coming out and speaking and not hiding like they have been. They know us fans are not happy and will be kicked out if things continue.
 
Back
Top