Danny Wieldler SMH

barrytiger

New member
http://m.smh.com.au/sport/robbie-farah-the-fall-guy-in-wests-tigers-battle-over-coach-mick-potter-20140802-zzuqq.html
 
Not keen on Weidler but interesting reading nonetheless…
Maybe Payten also being made a fall guy?

http://www.smh.com.au/sport/robbie-farah-the-fall-guy-in-wests-tigers-battle-over-coach-mick-potter-20140802-zzuqq.html
 
Very interesting article. But it's Weidler - who knows whether it's true. If it is, Mayer should be shown the door - pronto. If it's true.
Who bloody knows with these clowns.
 
The only clowns are the hack journalists trying to fill space on their papers and making it sound like a scoop. These "reputable" journalists are shooting themselves in the foot with their all their different scapegoats. Didn't Rothfield report that it wasn't Mayer yet Weidler in another newspaper is indicating that it was Mayer. Quite simply the papers are beating up this issue with no proof on what they are asserting. There are laws of libel and if this keeps up maybe these jounos may soon receive a surprise.
 
@Newtown said:
The only clowns are the hack journalists trying to fill space on their papers and making it sound like a scoop.

Hear hear. All the journos want is drama, they don't care who gets thrown under the bus.
 
Danny Wiedler - the weak echo of a stale fart…. Seriously his column just pumps the tyres of his mates and bags those who aren't. He has the credibility of Peter Foster at an honesty session.
 
@Newtown said:
The only clowns are the hack journalists trying to fill space on their papers and making it sound like a scoop. These "reputable" journalists are shooting themselves in the foot with their all their different scapegoats. Didn't Rothfield report that it wasn't Mayer yet Weidler in another newspaper is indicating that it was Mayer. Quite simply the papers are beating up this issue with no proof on what they are asserting. There are laws of libel and if this keeps up maybe these jounos may soon receive a surprise.

They're the clowns I was referring to.
 
People, PO's should copy and paste these atricles so everyone doesnt have to click their links making them more money
 
@innsaneink said:
People, PO's should copy and paste these articles so everyone doesn't have to click their links making them more money

Why are you begrudging people making a living. Should we stand outside the door where you work asking people not to pay you?

Posting a link to an article is the correct protocol.

You can post a snippet of the article but not the whole thing because….

a) **Your not actually allowed to. Journalists and bloggers get paid to write on these sites so you'll go to their site to read them, that's the point. If you steal an article and post on another forum, the author or the paying site can / will make you remove it.**

b) No one wants to have to scroll through a giant article / wall of text within a thread. A summary paragraph and a link so peeps can go read the full article if they want is generally the done thing.
 

Members online

Back
Top