jirskyr
Well-known member
I was shaking my head at Anasta in the first 30 last night, some shoddy options. He seemed to iron out his second half and didn't do much wrong.
I am wondering, however, how far we can get with players "not doing much wrong". We need attacking threats across the park, and I don't think Anasta is quite there, he still takes more poor options than good ones.
I know we need calm heads on the park, I wonder though how long Blake Austin sits in NSW Cup this year. Anasta defends ok but he is not going to make a line break. Austin's defence is a bit suss for me, but he is far more threatening with the ball.
So the question is, do you change what is currently a winning formula? I am guessing the coach will not.
Keith Lulia on the other hand - the quicker he is out, the better. He is adequate backup and I can tolerate him more if he doesn't try to pass, but Simona and Lawrence are first-choice, if we can ever have them both fit at the same time.
I am wondering, however, how far we can get with players "not doing much wrong". We need attacking threats across the park, and I don't think Anasta is quite there, he still takes more poor options than good ones.
I know we need calm heads on the park, I wonder though how long Blake Austin sits in NSW Cup this year. Anasta defends ok but he is not going to make a line break. Austin's defence is a bit suss for me, but he is far more threatening with the ball.
So the question is, do you change what is currently a winning formula? I am guessing the coach will not.
Keith Lulia on the other hand - the quicker he is out, the better. He is adequate backup and I can tolerate him more if he doesn't try to pass, but Simona and Lawrence are first-choice, if we can ever have them both fit at the same time.