AmericanHistoryX
Well-known member
minus the refs - we were the better team.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
@AmericanHistoryX said:so you agree Willow with Ink that you've seen this type of football before from us?
@TIGER said:I know what your all saying and to some extent I agree, but for me it just highlights how tough Melbourne are.
We probably played to our potential, Melbourne were out of sorts whether it was due to the way we were playing or a bit of fatigue catching up on them from their big off season who knows! but they stuck in there and when they found they're rhythm they put us away pretty easily.
We need to find a way to start scoring some points and really fast its a big problem at the moment.
@willow said:@AmericanHistoryX said:so you agree Willow with Ink that you've seen this type of football before from us?
Yep, not often though which is why I will reserve judgement until we can string those types of performances together on a consistent basis.
@simonthetiger said:@TIGER said:I know what your all saying and to some extent I agree, but for me it just highlights how tough Melbourne are.
We probably played to our potential, Melbourne were out of sorts whether it was due to the way we were playing or a bit of fatigue catching up on them from their big off season who knows! but they stuck in there and when they found they're rhythm they put us away pretty easily.
We need to find a way to start scoring some points and really fast its a big problem at the moment.
2 points…attack wise we were far from our best.Passes werent hitting the mark and we cruelled out field position.
Why did they find their rythym??14-7 ping count and numerous 50/50's......they would have put that score on anyone,most probably more with that late glut of possesion.
@AmericanHistoryX said:@willow said:@AmericanHistoryX said:so you agree Willow with Ink that you've seen this type of football before from us?
Yep, not often though which is why I will reserve judgement until we can string those types of performances together on a consistent basis.
Fair enough.
I dont know, I cant put it into words Willow
But i think we all saw something Monday night that we havent seen for a long time.
I thought we reached new heights.
And yes i agree the consistency is not there.
Thats what Potter is there for.
@TIGER said:I know what your all saying and to some extent I agree, but for me it just highlights how tough Melbourne are.
We probably played to our potential, Melbourne were out of sorts whether it was due to the way we were playing or a bit of fatigue catching up on them from their big off season who knows! but they stuck in there and when they found they're rhythm they put us away pretty easily.
We need to find a way to start scoring some points and really fast its a big problem at the moment.
@AmericanHistoryX said:@innsaneink said:I'd like to see it fairly consistently before I get too excited….if we can put in performances like that on a regular basis and then build from there....then we can get excited
Seen it before, stirring inspired performances on the back of a pathetic effort the week before.
nah nah nah Ink - this time it was different.