Byron_Bay_Fan
New member
@hammertime said:@goldcoast tiger said:@hammertime said:@goldcoast tiger said:No one can afford him
And that not his fault
I suppose some could pay less for him and then pay him more later…
Or has someone already thought of that. It'd work well
The Tigers would happily subsidise. He wouldn't be expensive at all
If that was the case , and we had to pay most of his contract, there's not much use in him leaving is there.
If we don't end up with a bag full of money, why get rid of the best hooker we have?
And you are forgetting that he signed to be here until the end of his contract, and has the right to do that if he wants to.
It's his decision where he lives and plays.
I'm talking half his contract and the benefits are pretty obvious to me and most on this forum.
Of course he has the rights to stay. Taylor also has a contract and has rights to bench him or play him in new cup if he wants . Particularly if he continues to create distabiling media articles.
Back on topic, would love for the dogs to take him.
We have been through this a thousand times. I can only think of one direct media article by Farah a few weeks ago as a backgrounder for SOO, just factual, honest and understandable. The team has worked well this year. Taylor has not demoted Farah once so that was obviously only a bluff to get Robbie to leave. So Robbie took any offer that was around, the Roosters maybe a 100K - but then Taylor backed off. So it was Taylor or his team or management that created the fuss that they could not deliver on.
And why do they want Robbie to leave - just to escape the back loading that helped the Club out in earlier years. Robbie, for his age, is still training diligently and always a top player so he has kept his side of the agreement.
