Finals Week 1 *spoliers*

@nrlsurvivor said in [Finals Week 1 \*spoliers\*](/post/1470307) said:
@tig_prmz said in [Finals Week 1 \*spoliers\*](/post/1470305) said:
@nrlsurvivor said in [Finals Week 1 \*spoliers\*](/post/1470303) said:
Peachey caused that try with a very poor read. There’s a reason certain players are off contract at this stage of the season.

Nope, Tupinua had the 4th in defender beat.. Peach had to go in.

No way. Fermor had Tuponiua covered. Peach just didn’t trust him.

Disagree, he was way too far. Where Peach and Tuponiua connected, Fermor was not even in picture.
 
A front rower intercept try would've made me extremely happy... too bad Wallace is as slow as my grandpa
 
I know people hate this rule but I agree with it regarding catching the ball on the outside shoulder.

If Fifita had caught the ball on the outside shoulder, he would've been moving sideways and possibly easier to handle. By catching the ball on the inside, he can run a lot straighter and make it a one on one.

It's not just technical IMO.
 
@mike said in [Finals Week 1 \*spoliers\*](/post/1470318) said:
@tig_prmz said in [Finals Week 1 \*spoliers\*](/post/1470314) said:
That's Victor's AC joint gone.

And then sets up Tedesco to score

Amazing isn't it. Although AC joint injuries are mainly pain limiting. He'll be getting an injection at half time I reckon.
 
@tig_prmz said in [Finals Week 1 \*spoliers\*](/post/1470319) said:
I know people hate this rule but I agree with it regarding catching the ball on the outside shoulder.

If Fifita had caught the ball on the outside shoulder, he would've been moving sideways and possibly easier to handle. By catching the ball on the inside, he can run a lot straighter and make it a one on one.

It's not just technical IMO.

Disagree , no one was impeded. Common sense should prevail.
 
@tigerpower said in [Finals Week 1 \*spoliers\*](/post/1470329) said:
@tig_prmz said in [Finals Week 1 \*spoliers\*](/post/1470319) said:
I know people hate this rule but I agree with it regarding catching the ball on the outside shoulder.

If Fifita had caught the ball on the outside shoulder, he would've been moving sideways and possibly easier to handle. By catching the ball on the inside, he can run a lot straighter and make it a one on one.

It's not just technical IMO.

Disagree , no one was impeded. Common sense should prevail.

I agree that it shouldn't be black and white... but the third in defender's line of sight was impeded and there wasn't enough depth in that play.

Keirghan messed up by not getting Fifita one on one but the way they got one on one was illegal.
 
Peter V and his high tackle rule is a absolute joke. That was a terrible call on Proctor, when are these ref going to use some common sense. There is a real chance that brain dead call could cost the Coast a finals win
 
@supercoach said in [Finals Week 1 \*spoliers\*](/post/1470335) said:
Peter V and his high tackle rule is a absolute joke. That was a terrible call on Proctor, when are these ref going to use some common sense. There is a real chance that brain dead call could cost the Coast a finals win

Agree its about time common sense was made by the bunker,everytime a player holds his head the bunker has to start giving feedback that contact was insignificant and 50/50 calls must go to the non head holder
 

Latest posts

Members online

Back
Top