happy_tiger
Well-known member
@diedpretty said in [First two NRL rounds face axe if\.\.\.\.\.](/post/1140308) said:@happy_tiger said in [First two NRL rounds face axe if\.\.\.\.\.](/post/1140165) said:@Snake said in [First two NRL rounds face axe if\.\.\.\.\.](/post/1140155) said:No conflict of interest here ?! Not when the Pearse’s are involved.. This whole game is run by mugs..
How can a totally different Comp with two different conferences and one team not playing and shortened to half the season be classified the same as the postponed season .. am I missing something other than preferential treatment ! the NRL are an organisation that just keeps giving .. a book needs to be written about this mob the 101 how to destroy a sporting organisation ..
Again I ask Snake ...what choice do they have in regards to getting the comp up and running unless we base all teams at one place
You're missing his point happy. Teams like Canberra and Parra have played Titans, Warriors and Bulldogs in first 2 rounds. Hardly a tough start to pick up 4 points. Whereas the sharks have had to play the bunnies and the storm for 2 close losses. The only fair way for teams to keep their points from the first 2 rounds is to have a 13 week season whereby every team would have played each other once.
You missed my point (directly above yours ) if it was the WT's sitting on two wins how would we feel if we had the two wins stripped