Game Charges v Souths

[member850]

Also Latrell got charged for sliding in with the knees after Garner scored. That means we should've got an 8 point try which would've massively changed the game

Garner should have stayed down

That’s the difference between us and the good team,
Munster, Laui, Gutherson, to name a few, they all know when to stay down to milk a penalty.
Not us, we are always straight back up.
‘The good guys of the league’.

 

[Tigerlily]

The fact someone can get suspended for 3 games yet the team they did it against gets absolutely 0 benefit makes no sense. He needs to be binned or sent off. Instead the next 3 teams Souths play will benefit

If a team doesn’t get any advantage during the game due to an indiscretion by an opposing player and there is no sin binning/send off during play and then that same players gets a couple of weeks on the side for those foul plays.

With absolutely no advantage whatsoever to the team that’s been disadvantaged by the oppositions ill discipline and by the poor referring for no sin binning/send off during play.

Maybe make it a rule that when those two teams (eg; WestsTigers and South’s) play each other again that that player (eg; Lattrell) is band from that follow on game of the two teams.

 

[Speed2burn]

Also Latrell got charged for sliding in with the knees after Garner scored. That means we should've got an 8 point try which would've massively changed the game

Garner should have stayed down

Talau should’ve smashed Latrell in the in-goal... prior

Let’s be real ... we probably would have been penalised

Unbelievable how much they nitpicked us

Why would be penalised..
If Talau tackles Latrell in the in-goal the Kick out at Garner never eventuates .

These are the 1% plays we suck at .

If any player should have stayed down it should’ve been Nofoaluma..

Then a Latrell would’ve seen 10 in the bin ..
We need to play smarter .

I’m taking the piss lol

Also Latrells foot was out , so it should never have got to the Garner stage anyway

I know ...(piss)
I’m being realistic
His foot never went out

Talau stuffed up

Idk how to post photos off my phone on here

But his boots def scrape the white line

Still doesn’t excuse Talau I agree

 

[hobbo1]

The fact someone can get suspended for 3 games yet the team they did it against gets absolutely 0 benefit makes no sense. He needs to be binned or sent off. Instead the next 3 teams Souths play will benefit

If a team doesn’t get any advantage during the game due to an indiscretion by an opposing player and there is no sin binning/send off during play and then that same players gets a couple of weeks on the side for those foul plays.

With absolutely no advantage whatsoever to the team that’s been disadvantaged by the oppositions ill discipline and by the poor referring for no sin binning/send off during play.

Maybe make it a rule that when those two teams (eg; WestsTigers and South’s) play each other again that that player (eg; Lattrell) is band from that follow on game of the two teams.

So he’s looking at 3 weeks with no advantage to us ..
My thinking is ..
1 week ban plus a fine for the Nofoaluma hit ..
Plus he misses a game next time he plays against us even if in the meantime he swaps clubs .
My 2 cents

More cans of worms ?

 

[hobbo1]

Also Latrell got charged for sliding in with the knees after Garner scored. That means we should've got an 8 point try which would've massively changed the game

Garner should have stayed down

Talau should’ve smashed Latrell in the in-goal... prior

Let’s be real ... we probably would have been penalised

Unbelievable how much they nitpicked us

Why would be penalised..
If Talau tackles Latrell in the in-goal the Kick out at Garner never eventuates .

These are the 1% plays we suck at .

If any player should have stayed down it should’ve been Nofoaluma..

Then a Latrell would’ve seen 10 in the bin ..
We need to play smarter .

I’m taking the piss lol

Also Latrells foot was out , so it should never have got to the Garner stage anyway

I know ...(piss)
I’m being realistic
His foot never went out

Talau stuffed up

Idk how to post photos off my phone on here

But his boots def scrape the white line

Still doesn’t excuse Talau I agree

Click on this


Select photo from your library

Simples

 

[hsvjones]

Also Latrell got charged for sliding in with the knees after Garner scored. That means we should've got an 8 point try which would've massively changed the game

Garner should have stayed down

Talau should’ve smashed Latrell in the in-goal... prior

Let’s be real ... we probably would have been penalised

Unbelievable how much they nitpicked us

Why would we be penalised..
If Talau tackles Latrell in the in-goal the Kick out at Garner never eventuates .

These are the 1% plays we suck at .

If any player should have stayed down it should’ve been Nofoaluma..

Then Latrell would’ve seen 10 in the bin ..
We need to play smarter .

Disagree.. Talau was going around him to push the ball back inwards and feel he made the correct decision otherwise it might of went dead itself and 7 tackle set.

 

[hobbo1]

Also Latrell got charged for sliding in with the knees after Garner scored. That means we should've got an 8 point try which would've massively changed the game

Garner should have stayed down

Talau should’ve smashed Latrell in the in-goal... prior

Let’s be real ... we probably would have been penalised

Unbelievable how much they nitpicked us

Why would we be penalised..
If Talau tackles Latrell in the in-goal the Kick out at Garner never eventuates .

These are the 1% plays we suck at .

If any player should have stayed down it should’ve been Nofoaluma..

Then Latrell would’ve seen 10 in the bin ..
We need to play smarter .

Disagree.. Talau was going around him to push the ball back inwards and feel he made the correct decision otherwise it might of went dead itself and 7 tackle set.

Nah
Looked like he was going for the strip
Didn’t stand a chance ..
Amateur hour .

 

[wonka]

Am I crazy but it feels like every week a Talau mistake turns the game & we go on to loose.

 

[hobbo1]

Am I crazy but it feels like every week a Talau mistake turns the game & we go on to loose.

He’s loose alright

 

[Geo]

Should have gone to the bin for his elbow on Nofoaluma..

 

[tigertye]

Also Latrell got charged for sliding in with the knees after Garner scored. That means we should've got an 8 point try which would've massively changed the game

I’ve had a idea on how this could be fixed for a while that I think is really simple. The suspension is served by the player only against the team the offence happened. Regardless to whether that player changes teams.

So if Latrell is suspended for 3 games for an incident, he is suspended the next 3 times he plays us. This way the advantage doesn’t go to the following week/s team.

 

[gato]

If it had BJ he would have binned for the elbow at the least and sent off for lashing out with the boot and then all the so called media experts would be saying he should be rubbed out of the game for good. There has always been double standards in the NRL but the biggest example is latrell he is one of the biggest grubs in the game and the NRL and their media make him out to be some kind of messiah

 

[Chicken_Faced_Killa]

Also Latrell got charged for sliding in with the knees after Garner scored. That means we should've got an 8 point try which would've massively changed the game

I’ve had a idea on how this could be fixed for a while that I think is really simple. The suspension is served by the player only against the team the offence happened. Regardless to whether that player changes teams.

So if Latrell is suspended for 3 games for an incident, he is suspended the next 3 times he plays us. This way the advantage doesn’t go to the following week/s team.

What if they are injured the next time they play that team? Does that count? What if they don’t play that time again? What if it’s a preliminary final and you can take out a star player and know you’ll still get to play a grand final?

It’s just the way it is. Should have been dealt with on the field

 

[kiwitiger]

What a surprise Latrell will be available for Magic Round. You know that big marketing event. Was never going to be suspended for that.

 

[Deleted member 3518]

Just in: @SSFCRABBITOHS Latrell Mitchell facing three or four-game ban for high hit on David Nofoaluma and two $1600 fines for two incidents involving WestsTigers Luke Garner. Zane Musgrove free to play with fine for his high tackle. Full details on @NRLcom

Great. Talau gets sin binned for not being square at marker, but a 4 week ban incident is not enough for a WT penalty.

He should have been sent off , seriously .

 

[tigertye]

Also Latrell got charged for sliding in with the knees after Garner scored. That means we should've got an 8 point try which would've massively changed the game

I’ve had a idea on how this could be fixed for a while that I think is really simple. The suspension is served by the player only against the team the offence happened. Regardless to whether that player changes teams.

So if Latrell is suspended for 3 games for an incident, he is suspended the next 3 times he plays us. This way the advantage doesn’t go to the following week/s team.

What if they are injured the next time they play that team? Does that count? What if they don’t play that time again? What if it’s a preliminary final and you can take out a star player and know you’ll still get to play a grand final?

It’s just the way it is. Should have been dealt with on the field

I’m talking general season rule. Injuries - they aren’t playing anyway so I guess you could count that. Finals, I wouldn’t count towards the suspension, unless you vs them twice in a finals series.

The rule would stop teams being without their best for rep and finals games the majority of the time, but disadvantage the team who committed the offence during the regular season.

Definitely should’ve been dealt with during the game. Don’t disagree. Send them to the bin as well if necessary on top of the suspension.

It’s ridiculous that the team who commits the offence isn’t disadvantaged generally until the following week which has absolutely no advantage to the team they infringed against. It just benefits the next mob. Not to mention that you could be without your player for the remainder of the game if that offence causes injury, etc.

 

[Cairnstigers]

Also Latrell got charged for sliding in with the knees after Garner scored. That means we should've got an 8 point try which would've massively changed the game

I’ve had a idea on how this could be fixed for a while that I think is really simple. The suspension is served by the player only against the team the offence happened. Regardless to whether that player changes teams.

So if Latrell is suspended for 3 games for an incident, he is suspended the next 3 times he plays us. This way the advantage doesn’t go to the following week/s team.

What about this

If a player / Mitchell is on $30,000 a game and he gets a 3 game suspension then he should have the option to pay the player he made the offence on, 3 x $30,000 a total of $90,000 compensation and play the next week
Or take the 3 game suspension

If he wants to take the 3 suspension and still get paid, the Club, souths should be able to deduct that $90,000 from his contract payments (optional), but Mitchell still misses the 3 games from suspension and the full original contract amount still goes against souths cap

That will force the players to change or force clubs to instruct their players to change because either Mitchell wears it or the club does

This could be added in all players contracts to stop malicious acts like that from Latrell and others

Players will learn quickly

 

[DGilly]

Just in: @SSFCRABBITOHS Latrell Mitchell facing three or four-game ban for high hit on David Nofoaluma and two $1600 fines for two incidents involving WestsTigers Luke Garner. Zane Musgrove free to play with fine for his high tackle. Full details on @NRLcom

This system is a joke. Commits two terrible acts and nothing happens, but the teams that play Souths next benefit from his suspension

 

[Goldust]

Latrell literally coward punched Reynolds last year but was miraculously available for magic round.

 

[TrueTiger]

Latrell literally coward punched Reynolds last year but was miraculously available for magic round.

Souths are the pride of the league....you guys all thought Unca Nick has the NRL in his pocket....Russ baby has it all over Nick....
Another point to understand is the Indigenious factor,we are trying to praise our Aboriginal bros and sis and involve them in as much as we can...if that had of been Brooks or AD for example,how would they be dealt with...

Unfortunately grubs come in all colours ...it was on display on Saturday...