jirskyr
Well-known member
@diedpretty said in [Good win but\.\.\.](/post/1011204) said:@innsaneink said in [Good win but\.\.\.](/post/1011191) said:@diedpretty said in [Good win but\.\.\.](/post/1011158) said:That first 20 minutes was as good if not better than any football i have seen this year. Penrith were blown off the park. Our play the balls were so fast and the passing so crisp and accurate that Penrith really couldn't get their defensive line set. It was obvious the game plan was to attack them on the short side and it was relentless. It was perfect - no errors, no penalties, excellent kicking. I didn't think this team could play like that. They have now set the benchmark of what they can actually do if everyone is on their game. Whether we will see it again this year is questionable but i certainly hope we do.
It was unbelievable footy... But did Penrith really turn up.to.play?
I don't wanna rain on our parade but I doubt we'll face a worse more inept opposition again this year
Penrith were poor but that doesn't detract from the fact that we completed everything at 100% for that 20 minute period. I think Penrith were going to play themselves in to the game but were never allowed and by the time they pulled themselves together the game was over.
Same old same old - were Penrith just poor, or were we so good for 20 minutes as to make them look poor? 5 tries in 20 minutes is not your regular arm wrestle or mistake-fest, it's complete domination. Penrith didn't need to drop ball like our last match with them - we simply didn't give them the ball at all. And it's not as if it was just one play on repeat, we sliced through right, then Farah left, then 40/20 and Brooks left again, then back to Thompson on the right, then left again? (I think that was the sequence)